Need Tally
for Clients?

Contact Us! Here

  Tally Auditor

License (Renewal)
  Tally Gold

License Renewal

  Tally Silver

License Renewal
  Tally Silver

New Licence
  Tally Gold

New Licence
 
Open DEMAT Account with in 24 Hrs and start investing now!
From the Courts »
Open DEMAT Account in 24 hrs
 Inordinate delay in income tax appeal hearings
 Income Tax leviable on Tuition Fee in the Year of Rendering of Services: ITAT
 Supreme Court invoked its power under Article 142 of Constitution to validate notices issued under section 148 as notices issued under section 148A. However the same shall be subject to amended provisions of section 149.
 ITAT refuses to stay tax demand on former owner of Raw Pressery brand
 Bombay HC sets aside rejection of refund claims by GST authorities
 [Income Tax Act] Faceless Assessment Scheme does not take away right to personal hearing: Delhi High Court
 Rajasthan High Court directs GST Authority to Unblock Input Tax Credit availed in Electronic Credit Ledger
 Sebi-taxman fight over service tax dues reaches Supreme Court
 Delhi High Court Seeks Status Report from Centre for Appointments of Chairperson & Members in Adjudicating Authority Under PMLA
 Delhi High Court allows Income Tax Exemption to Charitable Society running Printing Press and uses Profit so generated for Charitable Purposes
 ITAT accepts Lease Income as Business Income as Business Investments were mostly in nature of Properties

DCIT, Circle 22(1), New Delhi Vs. Shri Sidharth Sahni, F-89/5, Okhla Indl. Area, Phase I, New Delhi.
November, 11th 2014
           IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
                (DELHI BENCH `G ', NEW DELHI)

       BEFORE SHRI I. C. SUDHIR, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND
            SHRI T.S. KAPOOR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
                       I.T.A. No. 5422/Del/2010
                       Assessment year : 2005-06
DCIT, Circle 22(1),                 Vs.        Shri Sidharth Sahni,
New Delhi                                      F-89/5, Okhla Indl. Area,
                                               Phase ­ I, New Delhi.
GIR / PAN:AAPRS6372G
         (Appellant)                      (Respondent)

                   Appellant by :      Shri BRR Kumar, Sr. DR
                   Respondent by :     Shri Kapil Goel, Adv.

                                       ORDER

PER T.S. KAPOOR, AM:

      This is an appeal filed by the Revenue against the order of Ld. CIT(A)
dated 21.09.2010. The revenue is aggrieved with the action of Ld. CIT(A)
by which he had deleted the addition of Rs.9,13,562/- made by the A.O. u/s
40(a)(ia) for non deduction of TDS.
2.    At the outset, the Ld. D.R. submitted that Ld. CIT(A) has wrongly
allowed the relief and he heavily relied upon the order of the A.O.
3.    On the other hand, Ld. A.R. heavily relied upon the order of Ld.
CIT(A) and submitted that Ld. CIT(A) after having noted that provisions for
tax deduction at source were not applicable to the individual in the year
under consideration, has rightly deleted the addition.
4.    We have hard rival parties and have gone through the material placed
on record. We find that the assessee in this appeal is an individual. During
                                        2               ITA No.5422/Del/2010







ht year under consideration, he made certain contractual payments. The
A.O. disallowed the payments holding that the assessee had not deducted tax
at source. Ld. CIT(A) on the other hand has given relief holding that
provisions of Section 40(a)(ia) were not applicable to individual in the year
under consideration. Ld. CIT(A) has deleted the addition by holding as
under:
         "{6} During the course of appellate proceedings the Authorized
         Representative of the appellant submitted that the provisions of
         section 194C governing the deduction of tax at source are not
         applicable to individual assesses for Assessment Year 2005-06 and
         the amendment to section 194C has been brought about w.e.f.
         01.06.2007. I have gone through the provisions of section 194C and it
         is apparent that the claim of the assessee in this regard is absolutely
         correct. The onus to deduct tax at source has been put on the
         individuals only from Assessment Year 2008-09 in respect of any
         payment to contractors. Therefore, the Assessing Officer has
         erroneously applied the provisions of section 194C in the case of the
         assessee for ay 2004-05 and a such addition made u/s 40(a) to the
         tune of Rs.9,13,652/- is deleted."






5.       From the perusal of the above, we find that Ld. CIT(A) has passed a
reasoned and speaking order and has rightly deleted the addition, which
requires no interference.
6.       In view of the above, appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed.
7.       Order pronounced in the open court on 31st Oct., 2014.


         Sd./-                                                     Sd./-
 ( I. C. SUDHIR)                                     (T.S. KAPOOR)
JUDICIAL MEMBER                                 ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
Date: 31st Oct., 2014
Sp
                                 3            ITA No.5422/Del/2010


Copy forwarded to:-
   1. The appellant
   2. The respondent
   3. The CIT
   4. The CIT (A)-, New Delhi.
   5. The DR, ITAT, Loknayak Bhawan, Khan Market, New Delhi.
True copy.
                                                    By Order


                                                 (ITAT, New Delhi).


S.No.             Details            Date     Initials Designation
  1   Draft dictated on              29.10.14           Sr. PS/PS
  2   Draft placed before author     29.10.14           Sr. PS/PS
      Draft proposed & placed
  3                                                      JM/AM
      before the Second Member
      Draft discussed/approved
  4                                                      AM/AM
      by Second Member
      Approved Draft comes to the
  5                                                     Sr. PS/PS
      Sr. PS/PS
  6   Kept for pronouncement                            Sr. PS/PS
  7   File sent to Bench Clerk    31/10/2014            Sr. PS/PS
      Date on which the file goes
  8
      to Head Clerk
      Date on which file goes to
  9
      A.R.
 10   Date of Dispatch of order

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2023 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Ritz Consulting