Need Tally
for Clients?

Contact Us! Here

  Tally Auditor

License (Renewal)
  Tally Gold

License Renewal

  Tally Silver

License Renewal
  Tally Silver

New Licence
  Tally Gold

New Licence
 
Open DEMAT Account with in 24 Hrs and start investing now!
« VAT (Value Added Tax) »
Open DEMAT Account in 24 hrs
 Gujarat slashes tax on ATF by 5 per cent
 CENVAT Credit can’t be denied If ISD invoices issued for distribution of ITC prior to Registration
 1 step forward, 2 steps back. Is GST going the VAT way?
 1 step forward, 2 steps back. Is GST going the VAT way?
 Pending VAT comes to haunt companies claiming input tax credit
 One-time settlement of VAT, excise disputes in the works
 Haryana government uploads photos of VAT defaulters
 Filing of online return for 4th quarter of 2017-18 extension of period thereof.
 No Cenvat credit admissible on outward transportation services from factory to buyer’s premises
  Filing of reconciliation return in form 9 for the year 2016-17
 Govt may send notice to 162 companies; ask for VAT returns

Column: States back to pre-VAT chaos
November, 28th 2013

While continuing to block the introduction of GST, the states are making changes to the Value Added Tax (VAT) laws which are a blow to the economy. The most recent change is an amendment by Tamil Nadu, which severely restricts the tax credits in respect of inputs used in inter-state sales. It denies credit for the first 3% of the tax on any inputs for use in inter-state sales—which attract the 2% Central Sales Tax (CST)—and the first 5% on tax on inputs for inter-state branch transfers.

Effectively, inter-state shipments become subject to a tax of up to 5% in the exporting state. Similar restrictions apply in Gujarat. It blocks 2% of input taxes on inter-state sales and 4% on inter-state branch transfers.

These changes are retrograde and amount to the states shooting themselves in the foot. They increase the cost of production and investment and discourage location of production in the state. The economy suffers, so do the states as, without production, they would have no revenue to collect. It is strange for Tamil Nadu and Gujarat to implement such policies while they have been aggressively wooing manufacturers to locate production facilities in their jurisdictions.

When VAT was introduced in 2005, it was levied in a harmonised manner across the states with a uniform base, tax rates and rules and regulations. Full credits were allowed for input taxes, including those for inputs used in inter-state sales. The only blockage was for inputs going into inter-state branch transfers which were not subject to the CST. This model simplified compliance, provided boost to investment and economic growth, reduced tax-cascading and significantly improved voluntary tax compliance through proper tracking of inputs and outputs. Thanks to the massive deviations over the last few years, the current system bears little resemblance to the original model.

The system has now degenerated into a tax jungle of 30-plus different VATs. The changes negate the very objective of having VAT, viz. harmonisation of tax rates and base, full input tax credits to minimise tax-cascading, and simplification of rules and procedures to facilitate voluntary compliance.

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2024 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Ritz Consulting