Need Tally
for Clients?

Contact Us! Here

  Tally Auditor

License (Renewal)
  Tally Gold

License Renewal

  Tally Silver

License Renewal
  Tally Silver

New Licence
  Tally Gold

New Licence
 
Open DEMAT Account with in 24 Hrs and start investing now!
« Top Headlines »
Open DEMAT Account in 24 hrs
 Delhi HC Rules GST Registration Cannot Be Cancelled Retrospectively Without a Clear Show Cause Notice (SCN)
 Belated income tax return AY 2026-27: How to file, late filing charges and what you may lose
 Major Financial Changes from August 1, 2026: ITR Deadline, RBI MPC Meeting, Tatkal Ticket Rules & More
 Government proposes to ease tax relief conditions for offshore funds
 TallyPrime Connected Banking: Automating Banking and Accounting
 ITR Filing Deadline 2026: Is July 31 the Last Date to File Your Income Tax Return? Latest Official Update
 ITR filing deadline nears: How to file income tax return online on e-filing portal - quick 15-step guide
 Will the ITR Filing Deadline Be Extended Beyond July 31 for FY 2025-26? Here's the Latest Update for Taxpayers
 Income Tax Refund Delayed for AY 2026-27? 5 Common Reasons Your Refund May Be Stuck and How to Fix It
 ITR Filing 2026: FM Nirmala Sitharaman Asks Tax Officials to Let Honest Taxpayers Correct Genuine Mistakes
 Will Your FCNR Deposit Stay Tax-Free After Returning to India? Tax Rules Explained for NRIs

Pooja Bhatt gets a breather in tax case
November, 18th 2008

Actress Pooja Bhatt has got a reprieve from the tax demand on the $6,000 she received for performing in Canada. A tax tribunal has ruled that she is liable to pay tax only in Canada, the place where the income was generated.

The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Mumbai, said the India-Canada double taxation avoidance agreement (DTAA) provides for taxing the income earned by artists at the source country. The income under question belongs to assessment year 1994-95.

Ms Bhatt had already paid $900 in Canada as tax deducted at source. The IT department, however, raised a demand on the artist, on the presumption that under the Income-tax Act of India, the entire global income of Ms Bhatt can be taxed in India the country of her residence. The departments order was upheld by the commissioner (appeal) the first appellate authority on tax matters. Ms Bhatt then approached the ITAT, Mumbai.

The ITAT, in its order last month, held that Ms Bhatts income could not be taxed in India in the context of India-Canada DTAA, which clearly states that income may be taxed in the source country. The ITAT took into account a similar issue that came up before the Madhya Pradesh High Court in the case of Torqouise Investment & Finance.

In this case, the court, following the decision of the Madras High Court in the case of SRM Firm and others, held that income arising on the sale of immovable property in Malaysia cannot be taxed in India. In this case, the Supreme Court had affirmed the view of the Madhya Pradesh High Court.

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2026 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Ritz Consulting