Representation of CIT(DRs) and Sr. DRs. before ITAT Representation of CIT(DRs) and Sr. DRs. before ITAT Chartered Accountant CA ICAI Chartered Accountants CA ICAI CAinINDIA ICAI Announcements Accounting Standards CA News ICAI Students ICAI Members Case Laws CPT IPCC Final ICAI Course CA Course ICAI Forum CA Question Papers ICAI Study Material

« From the Courts »

Open DEMAT Account in 24 hrs
Karnataka High Court restrains Bengaluru-based Institute of Chartered Tax Practitioners India from enrolling candidates for its courses
Attachment on Cash Credit of Assessee under GST Act: Delhi HC directs Bank to Comply Instructions to Vacate
Income Tax Addition Made Towards Unsubstantiated Share Capital Is Eligible For Section 80-IC Deduction: Delhi High Court
Inordinate delay in income tax appeal hearings
Income Tax leviable on Tuition Fee in the Year of Rendering of Services: ITAT
Supreme Court invoked its power under Article 142 of Constitution to validate notices issued under section 148 as notices issued under section 148A. However the same shall be subject to amended provisions of section 149.
ITAT refuses to stay tax demand on former owner of Raw Pressery brand
Bombay HC sets aside rejection of refund claims by GST authorities
[Income Tax Act] Faceless Assessment Scheme does not take away right to personal hearing: Delhi High Court
Rajasthan High Court directs GST Authority to Unblock Input Tax Credit availed in Electronic Credit Ledger
Sebi-taxman fight over service tax dues reaches Supreme Court


« Appeal to the High Court - Valuation of stock, Tag price...	Periodical payments to non-resident subject to TDS: Advance... »
Representation of CIT(DRs) and Sr. DRs. before ITAT

November, 27th 2006
Allocation of work - Representation of CIT(DRs) and Sr. DRs. before ITAT The CBDT laid down the parameters for allocation of work between the CIT(DRs) and the Sr. DRs. for their representation before the ITAT. Also, the CIT(DRs) and Sr. DRs were required to submit a monthly performance report on the cases or category of cases represented by them before the Bench. Work allocation of CIT(DRs)/Sr. DRs regarding- Reference is invited to Boards earlier Instruction No. 9 dated 15.9.2003 on the subject of work allocation of CIT(DRs)/Sr. DRs In supercession of earlier instruction on this subject, the Board has decided to lay down the following parameters for allocation of work between the CIT(DRs) and the Sr. DRs. for representation before ITAT. 2. The allocation of work between the CIT(DRs) and Sr. DRs would be as under: (A) Cases to be argued by the CIT(DRs): (i) All appeals relating to core cases of Search/Block assessment and such other cases of search, as are assigned by the CCIT. (ii) All appeals referred to a Special Bench or Third Member Bench of ITAT. (iii) All appeals filed against order passed under sec 263. (iv) All appeals in which the aggregate of the additions made by the A.O. in case is more than; a) Rs.2 crore in the cities of Mumbai and Delhi. b) Rs. 1 crore in the cities of Chennai, Kolkata, Ahmedabad, Hyderabad, Bangalore and Pune and, c) Rs. 50 lakhs in other cities." (v) All Scam related cases. (B) Cases to be argued by Sr. DRs: All cases other than those mentioned above. 3. The CCIT may, in relaxation of the above parameters, assign cases to CIT(DRs)/Sr.DR, in exceptional circumstances. 4. The CIT(DRs) and Sr. DRs would also submit a Monthly performance report on the cases/category of cases represented by them before the Bench. The proforma for such report will be intimated separately. This should be brought to the notice of all CIT(DRs) and Sr. DRs for immediate compliance. Sd/- Madhukar Kumar Bhagat Deputy Secretary to the Govt. of India F.No.279/Misc-117/2006 ITJ Government of India Ministry of Finance Central Board of Direct Taxes New Delhi