Need Tally
for Clients?

Contact Us! Here

  Tally Auditor

License (Renewal)
  Tally Gold

License Renewal

  Tally Silver

License Renewal
  Tally Silver

New Licence
  Tally Gold

New Licence
 
Open DEMAT Account with in 24 Hrs and start investing now!
« From the Courts »
Open DEMAT Account in 24 hrs
 Karnataka High Court restrains Bengaluru-based Institute of Chartered Tax Practitioners India from enrolling candidates for its courses
 Attachment on Cash Credit of Assessee under GST Act: Delhi HC directs Bank to Comply Instructions to Vacate
 Income Tax Addition Made Towards Unsubstantiated Share Capital Is Eligible For Section 80-IC Deduction: Delhi High Court
 Inordinate delay in income tax appeal hearings
 Income Tax leviable on Tuition Fee in the Year of Rendering of Services: ITAT
 Supreme Court invoked its power under Article 142 of Constitution to validate notices issued under section 148 as notices issued under section 148A. However the same shall be subject to amended provisions of section 149.
 ITAT refuses to stay tax demand on former owner of Raw Pressery brand
 Bombay HC sets aside rejection of refund claims by GST authorities
 [Income Tax Act] Faceless Assessment Scheme does not take away right to personal hearing: Delhi High Court
 Rajasthan High Court directs GST Authority to Unblock Input Tax Credit availed in Electronic Credit Ledger
 Sebi-taxman fight over service tax dues reaches Supreme Court

Sh. Ankit Kapoor, B-102, R.G. City Centre, Plot No. 4, Motia Khan, Paharganj, New Delhi Vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-63(4), New Delhi
October, 27th 2021

This Miscel laneous Appl ication is arising out in ITA No. 7692/Del/2018 vide order dated 06.02.2019.


2. The assessee is engaged in the business of Trading and Export of processed and non-processed edible products during the year. The sale off the assessee was increased from Rs.8.23 Crores to Rs.58.81 Crores. The Assessing Off icer held that there was more than 700% growth whereas the GP went down by 2.3%. Before the AO, the assessee explained that the reason was due to computation in the market.

3. On going through the facts, the Assessing Of f icer held as under:

“I am not satisf ied with the submission of the assessee that due to competition in the market when the sales increase more than 700%. In the absence of proper submission and details, I disal low a sum of Rs.2,00,000/- to cover the leakage in the trading results and is added to the income of the assessee.”

 

The Assessing Off icer further made addition of Rs.5.14 Crores on account of “sundry creditors” which is the total outstanding amount under the head “sundry creditors” owing to non-furnishing of confirmations in response to the notices issued u/s 133(6) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. While the notices have been issued to the “sundry creditors” of value of Rs.2.58 Crores out of which repl ies have been received from the creditors to the tune of Rs.1.30 Crores, the addition should be rightly of Rs.1.28 Crores only which stands corrected by the ld. CIT(A). This is an apparent error in the Assessment Order. From the record, we find that the fact of non-receipt of the response from the “sundry creditors” has not been intimated to the assessee neither any show cause notice has been issued before making the addition which is a clear infraction of the principles of natural justice.

For more information

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2025 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Ritz Consulting