Need Tally
for Clients?

Contact Us! Here

  Tally Auditor

License (Renewal)
  Tally Gold

License Renewal

  Tally Silver

License Renewal
  Tally Silver

New Licence
  Tally Gold

New Licence
 
Open DEMAT Account with in 24 Hrs and start investing now!
« ITAT-Constitution of Benches »
Open DEMAT Account in 24 hrs
 Faulty Income Tax Assessment: ITAT Quashes Addition and Penalty against 82 Years Old Senior Citizen
 Amrit Bottlers Pvt. Ltd. Kolkata vs Department Of Income Tax
 ITAT ruling: Cryptocurrencies now recognized as capital assets for taxation
 ITAT upholds Possession Date for Capital Gains Tax Exemption
 ITAT deletes addition of Cash Deposit against Opening Balance during demonetization
 Mere Securing a House on Rent in USA is not conclusive fact that Assessee is US Resident to Allow DTAA Benefit: ITAT
 20 LPA Opening Hiring Qualified CA For Assurance Manager Profile
 Non-Filing of Income Tax Return amounts to Escapement of Income: ITAT upholds Reassessment u/s 147
 Non Appreciation of facts in true perspective: ITAT sets aside Revision Order
 No Evidence of Tax Evasion by showing Fictitious or False Transactions: ITAT deletes Addition of Expenditure u/s 40A(3)
 Earning Interest Income from Inter-Corporate Deposit is Business Income: ITAT

ITAT gives partial reprieve to Uber in tax demand case
October, 11th 2018

In a partial reprieve for Uber India, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has granted a stay against a tax demand levied on the cab-hailing company and restrained the authorities from imposing any penalty.

Uber had approached the tribunal after income-tax authorities carried out a survey and alleged that the company had not deducted tax at source on payments made to driver-partners.

The tribunal partially stayed the demand, subject to Uber India depositing Rs 20 crore in three instalments pending disposal of the appeal. The main issue of applicability of tax deduction at source on payments will now be heard on December 11.

The company submitted that the contract is between Uber BV, Netherlands, and the partner-drivers. Uber India is therefore not “responsible for paying” and not liable to deduct tax on payments to drivers, it said.

The tribunal restrained the department from passing any order imposing penalty as long as the matter is pending with it. The stay is valid for six months from the date of the order disposing of the appeal. Penalty proceedings, however, will continue.

The income tax department raised a tax demand of Rs 24.92 crore for assessment year 2016-17 and Rs 84.13 crore for AY2017-18 and issued a notice initiating penalty proceedings. The penalty amount levied will be equal to the quantum of tax deducted at source.

Uber India Systems Pvt Ltd. provides marketing and support services to cab aggregator Uber BV. These include acting as the collection and remittance agent for disbursing amounts to partner-drivers on behalf of Uber BV.

The company sought a stay on the tax demand, pending adjudication of the matter. It also requested that penalty being consequential in nature, the authorities be restrained from passing any order imposing penalty until the outcome of the appeal.

“With new and evolving business models, tax issues are bound to get more complex. It is imperative that the overall business dynamics, along with its impact on the economy and associated administrative burden, is taken into account while taking decisions on revenue collections,” said Vikas Vasal, national tax leader at Grant Thornton India.

Vasal said it is time that dispute resolution mechanisms are strengthened so that businesses have clarity and certainty on the likely tax impact of their business decisions.

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2025 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Ritz Consulting