Need Tally
for Clients?

Contact Us! Here

  Tally Auditor

License (Renewal)
  Tally Gold

License Renewal

  Tally Silver

License Renewal
  Tally Silver

New Licence
  Tally Gold

New Licence
 
Open DEMAT Account with in 24 Hrs and start investing now!
« Top Headlines »
Open DEMAT Account in 24 hrs
 ITR Filing 2025: These individuals are exempt from paying tax. Do they need to file returns?
 Full List Of Trump's Reciprocal Tariffs Announced Wednesday
 Top 5 tax-saving investment options for salaried individuals to consider before March 31, 2025
 5 lesser lesser-known avenues of tax saving you can use to save income tax before March 31, 2025
 March 15 is deadline for last advance tax installment: Know if you must pay

ISRO gets tax relief on Inmarsat payment
October, 24th 2008

In a major relief to Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO), the Authority for Advance Rulings (AAR) on Wednesday held that payments ma
de by the Indian space agency to the UK-based Inmarsat Global for hiring latters transponder services could not be taxed here. The ruling which favours ISROs Satellite Centre (ISAC) comes on a day when its parent body successfully launched countrys maiden lunar mission.

ISRO had entered into a contract with Inmarsat to lease a navigation transponder capacity for its GPS-aided Geo-augmented navigation (Gagan)-TDS project. The services of the transponder which was based on an Inmarsat satellite was accessed through data commands sent by ISRO from its ground station.

A fixed annual charge was paid by ISRO for hiring the satellites transponder services, which it said was used for better navigational accuracies of its Gagan project. The income tax department contended that ISRO had used the transponder equipment making it liable to deduct tax on its payment to Inmarsat for use of the facility. AAR, however, has ruled that the Indian space body did not operate the transponder as it received satellites access through its own network.

ISRO in submission to AAR said that it could not operate the transponder itself. It also raised questions over the territorial nexus of the equipment as it was placed in the space. Brushing aside the income tax departments contention that ISRO operated the satellite facilities, the AAR said that contractual terms did not provide for ISRO possessing or taking control of the satellite equipment.

It also turned down the revenues contention of drawing an analogy between the transponders operation to that of a television remote control. Remote control device is an accessory of the TV and the possessor of the TV himself operates the TV with that gadget, whereas ISROs ground station is an independent unit and not an accessory of the satellite, the ruling said.

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2025 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Ritz Consulting