Need Tally
for Clients?

Contact Us! Here

  Tally Auditor

License (Renewal)
  Tally Gold

License Renewal

  Tally Silver

License Renewal
  Tally Silver

New Licence
  Tally Gold

New Licence
 
Open DEMAT Account with in 24 Hrs and start investing now!
« Service Tax »
Open DEMAT Account in 24 hrs
 Central Govt Extended Time Limit to File Refund Claim of Service Tax on Exported Goods: CESTAT allows Refund
 Filing Income Tax Return Early? Make Sure To File Correct Details
 ITR 3 What is ITR 3 Form & How to File ITR-3?
 ITR Filing 2024: How To Claim Tax Refund Online, Check Step-by-step Guide To Know Status
 Income tax return filing for FY23-24: Check details of Form 16 issue date, ITR forms
 How to maximize tax benefits for senior citizens in India
 Income tax return filing: ITR filing 2024 date is upon us, but should you rush to file?
 Income Tax Return AY 2024-25: ITR-1, ITR-2, ITR-4 Enabled for Online Filing; Check Details
 New Tax Regime: What Is It? How Can You Opt For It? Comparison With Old One
 6 Ways to Save Income Tax On New & Old Tax Regime for FY 2023-24
 Income Tax SFT return filing due date extension: Facility to remain open for a couple of days Latest news

Commissioner of GST and CX (Appeals) grants Service Tax Refund for Flat cancellation
September, 09th 2020

The Commissioner of GST and CX (Appeals), Mumbai, granted the service tax refund in case of flat cancellation.

The appellant had booked a residential flat in a project of M/s. Bharat Infrastructure & Engineering Pvt. Ltd. for the total agreement value of Rs. 52,58,245.

M/s. Bharat Infrastructure & Engineering Pvt. Ltd., issued invoice to Mr. Haresh V Kagrana (HUF) on receipt of Rs. 25,00,000 and 27,50,000 from the appellant for service tax amounting to Rs. 90,625 and Rs. 99,688 respectively.

The appellant cancelled the flat however, M/s. Bharat Infrastructure & Engineering Pvt. Ltd. did not refund the service tax amount to the appellant.

 

The Commissioner (A), Nazim Arshi held that no service has been provided by the builder to the appellant as the consideration for service was returned and the service contract was terminated.

It was further noted that the provision of the relevant date of one year and date of payment as per Section 11B of CEA can not be made applicable in the present case. The service tax paid by the appellant is in the nature of the deposit and not service tax.

“The date of cancellation of the flat will be considered as the relevant date for calculating the time limit of one year, as the event that led to the refund of taxes is the cancellation by the buyer,” the order said.

Therefore the claim is not hit by the doctrine of unjust enrichment.


Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2024 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Ritz Consulting