Need Tally
for Clients?

Contact Us! Here

  Tally Auditor

License (Renewal)
  Tally Gold

License Renewal

  Tally Silver

License Renewal
  Tally Silver

New Licence
  Tally Gold

New Licence
 
Open DEMAT Account with in 24 Hrs and start investing now!
« Service Tax »
Open DEMAT Account in 24 hrs
 New Income Tax Bill 2025: 3 key changes that could make ITR filing easier
 Tax e-filing: New banks enabled for online tax payments via e-pay tax service Check the entire list of banks
 Income Tax Bill 2025: Changes under the new bill that taxpayers must know. Check FAQs
 ITR filing: Know the new Budget 2025 rules for filing updated income tax returns
 New Income Tax Bill 2025: What are expected changes and how will they affect you?
 From tax changes to capex growth 5 key expectations from Emkay Global for Indias economy
 Income Tax Returns: What are the consequences of not verifying your ITR within 30 days
 Income Tax: Want to update your ITR? You can file an updated tax return; Here s all you need to know
 ITR Filing 2024: How to check income tax refund status online using PAN card? A step-by-step guide
 ITR Filing 2024: Which Income Tax Regime Is Better For NRIs? Check Expert Inputs Here
 ITR filing 2024: How to check income tax refund status online? A step-by-step guide

Commissioner of GST and CX (Appeals) grants Service Tax Refund for Flat cancellation
September, 09th 2020

The Commissioner of GST and CX (Appeals), Mumbai, granted the service tax refund in case of flat cancellation.

The appellant had booked a residential flat in a project of M/s. Bharat Infrastructure & Engineering Pvt. Ltd. for the total agreement value of Rs. 52,58,245.

M/s. Bharat Infrastructure & Engineering Pvt. Ltd., issued invoice to Mr. Haresh V Kagrana (HUF) on receipt of Rs. 25,00,000 and 27,50,000 from the appellant for service tax amounting to Rs. 90,625 and Rs. 99,688 respectively.

The appellant cancelled the flat however, M/s. Bharat Infrastructure & Engineering Pvt. Ltd. did not refund the service tax amount to the appellant.

 

The Commissioner (A), Nazim Arshi held that no service has been provided by the builder to the appellant as the consideration for service was returned and the service contract was terminated.

It was further noted that the provision of the relevant date of one year and date of payment as per Section 11B of CEA can not be made applicable in the present case. The service tax paid by the appellant is in the nature of the deposit and not service tax.

“The date of cancellation of the flat will be considered as the relevant date for calculating the time limit of one year, as the event that led to the refund of taxes is the cancellation by the buyer,” the order said.

Therefore the claim is not hit by the doctrine of unjust enrichment.


Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2025 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Ritz Consulting