Need Tally
for Clients?

Contact Us! Here

  Tally Auditor

License (Renewal)
  Tally Gold

License Renewal

  Tally Silver

License Renewal
  Tally Silver

New Licence
  Tally Gold

New Licence
 
Open DEMAT Account with in 24 Hrs and start investing now!
« From the Courts »
Open DEMAT Account in 24 hrs
 Karnataka High Court restrains Bengaluru-based Institute of Chartered Tax Practitioners India from enrolling candidates for its courses
 Attachment on Cash Credit of Assessee under GST Act: Delhi HC directs Bank to Comply Instructions to Vacate
 Income Tax Addition Made Towards Unsubstantiated Share Capital Is Eligible For Section 80-IC Deduction: Delhi High Court
 Inordinate delay in income tax appeal hearings
 Income Tax leviable on Tuition Fee in the Year of Rendering of Services: ITAT
 Supreme Court invoked its power under Article 142 of Constitution to validate notices issued under section 148 as notices issued under section 148A. However the same shall be subject to amended provisions of section 149.
 ITAT refuses to stay tax demand on former owner of Raw Pressery brand
 Bombay HC sets aside rejection of refund claims by GST authorities
 [Income Tax Act] Faceless Assessment Scheme does not take away right to personal hearing: Delhi High Court
 Rajasthan High Court directs GST Authority to Unblock Input Tax Credit availed in Electronic Credit Ledger
 Sebi-taxman fight over service tax dues reaches Supreme Court

The Income Tax Officer, Ward-58(2), New Delhi. Vs. Smt. Mahi Preet Kaur, B-24, Ganesh Nagar, Pandav Nagar, Delhi – 110 092.
September, 17th 2019
       IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
              DELHI BENCHES "E": DELHI

  BEFORE SHRI BHAVNESH SAINI, JUDICIAL MEMBER
                       AND
      SHRI O.P. KANT, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

             ITA.Nos.3435 & 3436/Del./2017
        Assessment Years 2011-2012 & 2012-2013

                                  Smt. Mahi Preet Kaur,
The Income Tax Officer,           B-24, Ganesh Nagar,
Ward-58(2),                  vs., Pandav Nagar,
New Delhi.                        Delhi ­ 110 092.
                                  PAN ASKPK3020G
        (Appellant)                      (Respondent)

               For Revenue : Shri Atiq Ahmad, Sr. D.R.
               For Assessee :           -None-

            Date of Hearing : 16.09.2019
     Date of Pronouncement : 16.09.2019

                           ORDER

PER BHAVNESH SAINI, J.M.

          Both the appeals by the Revenue are directed

against the order of Ld. CIT(A)-19, New Delhi, Dated 17th

March, 2017 for the A.Ys. 2011-2012 and 2012-2013,

challenging the deletion of addition of Rs.99,23,454/- and

deleting addition of Rs.62,11,221/- and Rs.56,86,669/-

respectively in both the years.
                               2
                                       ITA.Nos.3435 & 3436/Del./2017
                                            Smt. Mahi Preet Kaur, Delhi.







2.          Admittedly, the tax effect in the Departmental

Appeals are less than Rs.50 lakhs. Vide Circular No.3/2018

Dated 11thJuly, 2018 issued by CBDT under section 268A of

the I.T. Act, it has been directed that the Department shall

not file appeal before the Tribunal in case where the tax

effect does not exceed the monetary limit of Rs.20 lakhs. It

is   also   directed   that   this   instruction       will     apply

retrospectively to pending appeals and appeals to be filed

henceforth in the Tribunal. Pending appeals below the

specified tax limit may be withdrawn/not pressed by the

Department. The CBDT Vide Circular No.17/2019 Dated

08.08.2019 amended the earlier Circular No.3/2018 (supra)

whereby it has been directed that monetary limit for filing

the Departmental appeal in Income Tax Cases may be

enhanced further through this amendment in para-3 of the

Circular mentioned above and accordingly, the monetary

limit for filing the appeal before the Appellate Tribunal have

been enhanced to Rs.50 lakhs. Since Circular No.17/2019

Dated 08.08.2019 have been issued to amend its earlier
                              3
                                     ITA.Nos.3435 & 3436/Del./2017
                                          Smt. Mahi Preet Kaur, Delhi.


Circular No.3/2018 (supra), therefore, all the conditions of

earlier Circular No.3/2018 shall apply accordingly.







3.        The Ld. D.R. in view of the above Board's

Circulars did not press the Departmental Appeals. The

cases of the Department would not fall in the exceptions

provided in the above Board Circulars. In the result, the

Departmental appeals are not maintainable as the appeals

are filed against the Board instructions referred to above

and therefore, the appeals of the Department are liable to be

dismissed.


5.        In the result, appeals of the Department are

dismissed.


          Order pronounced in the open Court.



     Sd/-                             Sd/-
    (O.P. KANT)                      (BHAVNESH SAINI)
ACCOUNTANT MEMBER                   JUDICIAL MEMBER

Delhi, Dated 16th September, 2019

VBP/-
                              4
                                      ITA.Nos.3435 & 3436/Del./2017
                                           Smt. Mahi Preet Kaur, Delhi.



Copy to

1.   The appellant
2.   The respondent
3.   CIT(A) concerned
4.   CIT concerned
5.   D.R. ITAT "E" Bench
6.   Guard File

                       // BY Order //




            Asst. Registrar : ITAT Delhi Benches :
                             Delhi.

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2025 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Ritz Consulting