Subject: extension for stay for a further period of six months from today or till the disposal of the appeal
Referred Sections: Section 254(2A)
Referred Cases / Judgments Delhi High Court in Pepsi Foods Pvt. Ltd vs. ACIT (2015) 376 ITR 87 (Del)
Stay No. 619/D/2018
(In ITA 671/AHD/2015)
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
DELHI BENCH `I-2' NEW DELHI
BEFORE SHRI N.K.BILLAIYA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
AND
SHRI SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA, JUDICIAL MEMBER
STAY NO. 619/Del/2018
(IN ITA No.671/AHD/2015)
Assessment Year: 2010-11
Vodafone Mobile Services Ltd., DCIT,
(Formerly known as Vodafone West Ltd.) Circle 4(1)(2),
C-48, Okhla Industrial Area, vs Ahmedabad.
Phase-II, New Delhi-110020
(PAN: AAACS4457Q)
Appellant Respondent
Assessee by :Shri Deepak Chopra, Adv.
Ms Manasvini Bajpai, Adv.
Department by: Ms Anchal Khandelwal, Sr. DR
Date of hearing : 14.09.2018
Date of pronouncement : 14.09.2018
ORDER
PER SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA, JUDICIAL MEMBER :
By means of this Stay Application, the assessee seeks
extension of the stay originally granted by the Tribunal on
17.04.2015 as extended from time to time and lastly on
25.01.2018 in relation to the assessment year 2010-11.
2. The Id, AR submitted that the conditions stipulated, while
granting original stay, were duly complied with and the delay in
disposing of the appeal has not occurred due to the assessee. It
1
Stay No. 619/D/2018
(In ITA 671/AHD/2015)
was, therefore, prayed that the stay hitherto granted may be
further extended. The Id. DR opposed the extension of stay.
3. We have heard the parties and perused the relevant material
on record. The Hon'ble Delhi High Court in Pepsi Foods Pvt. Ltd
vs. ACIT (2015) 376 ITR 87 (Del) has held that the third proviso
to section 254(2A) is constitutionally invalid. The net effect of this
judgment is that if the appeal could not be disposed of by the
Tribunal for no fault of the assessee, then the power vests with
the Tribunal to extend the stay beyond the aggregate period of
365 days.
4. On merits, it is indisputably found that the terms of stay
originally granted have been duly complied with. The appeal
could not be finally heard for one reason or the other, but for no
fault of the assessee. Considering the entirety of the facts and
circumstances of the instant case, we are inclined to grant
extension for stay for a further period of six months from today or
till the disposal of the appeal, whichever is earlier. The appeal is
directed to be fixed for hearing on 29.10.2018.
5. In the result, stay application of the assessee is
allowed.
2
Stay No. 619/D/2018
(In ITA 671/AHD/2015)
Order pronounced in the open court on 14th September, 2018.
Sd/- Sd/-
(N.K.BILLAIYA) (SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA)
ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER
Dated: 14th SEPTEMBER, 2018
`GS'
Copy forwarded to: -
1) Appellant
2) Respondent
3) CIT(A)
4) CIT
5) DR
True Copy
By Order
ASSTT. REGISTRAR
3
Stay No. 619/D/2018
(In ITA 671/AHD/2015)
Date of dictation
Date on which the typed draft is placed before the
dictating Member
Date on which the typed draft is placed before the Other
Member
Date on which the approved draft comes to the Sr.PS/PS
Date on which the fair order is placed before the
Dictating Member for pronouncement
Date on which the fair order comes back to the Sr.PS/PS
Date on which the final order is uploaded on the website
of ITAT
Date on which the file goes to the Bench Clerk
Date on which the file goes to the Head Clerk
The date on which the file goes to the Assistant
Registrar for signature on the order
Date of dispatch of the Order
4
|