News shortcuts: From the Courts | Top Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | Professional Updates | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing | GST - Goods and Services Tax
« General »
 Who is to blame for virus going viral from Nizamuddin?
 Income Tax Refund 2019-20: Get up to Rs 5k without adjusting outstanding demand
 Income Tax refund: Paid tax under dispute? Here’s how you can get it back in Vivad se Vishwas
 Finance Ministry extends due date for Renewal of Health, Motor Insurance Policies due to COVID-19 outbreak April 2, 2020
 AIIMS doctor tests positive for COVID-19 Coronavirus News India LIVE Updates
 Tax deadlines, penalties you needn’t worry about
 Tax saving deadline extended for FY2019-20
 Tax relief for PM CARE, PM National Relief funds must be at par
 RBI to announce steps to boost economy at 10 am today
 Covid-driven tax reliefs to cost government 2-3% of GDP
 Will govt extend these five financial deadlines amid coronavirus outbreak?

Entry tax on online orders illegal, rules Patna high court
September, 30th 2016

In a major reprieve for e-trailers, the Patna High Court has held that levy of entry tax on online purchases is illegal and unconstitutional. It has quashed the notification issued by Bihar government in a first of its kind order on the issue.

The high court said no tax can be levied on entry of goods into local areas if they are purchased on e-commerce portals for personal use or consumption of individuals “The impugned provisions for the Bihar Finance Act, 2015 amending the Bihar tax on entry of goods into local areas for consumption, use or sale therein…..are declared as ultravires to the constitution and accordingly quashed,” the court order said. The state had defended the levy saying it was compensatory in nature and it had powers to impose such discriminatory tax, an argument rejected by the court.

The decision has wider implication for the e-commerce sector battling state levies. A Flipkart spokesperson said: “The additional entry tax was an anti-consumer move, leading to price inflation and depriving users of full benefits of online shopping. The HC order will not only benefit existing Flipkart users, but also bring lakhs of additional customers to take benefit of the goodness of ecommerce.”

A number of states including Bihar, Assam, Gujarat, Rajasthan, Uttrakhand and most recently, Uttar Pradesh imposed entry tax on purchase of any products by residents in their states from any online retailer. The state had imposed the levy to protect local traders from goods coming in from other states via e-commerce route.

The Patna High Court has held that such a tax made a discrimination against the dealer of one state and another and in violation of the constitutional provisions.

Imposition of the entry tax was a double whammy for sellers as it had to pay central sales tax in the state of origin and then also bear entry tax in the consuming state. Products sold by local traders on the other hand would only attract value added tax. Some e-tailers had even stopped delivering goods in some of these states. Instakart (a Flipkart Group company) has challenged the move in various HCs.

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2020 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Ritz Consulting