Latest Expert Exchange Queries
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Service Tax | Sales Tax | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Indirect Tax | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing
Popular Search: cpt :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: due date for vat payment :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: VAT Audit :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: TDS :: VAT RATES :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: empanelment :: form 3cd
From the Courts »
 Group M. Media India Pvt. Ltd vs. UOI (Bombay High Court)
 Shreemati Devi vs. CIT (Allahabad High Court)
 Vatsala Shenoy vs. JCIT (Supreme Court)
  Dr. Gautam Sen vs. CCIT (Bombay High Court)
 Dr. Gautam Sen vs. CCIT (Bombay High Court)
 DCIT vs. Shivshankar R. Sharma (ITAT Mumbai)
 ACIT vs. Jawaharlal Agicha (ITAT Mumbai)
 CIT vs. M/s. D. Chetan & Co (Bombay High Court)
 Makes further amendments to Notification no. 157/90-Customs dated 28th March, 1990 regarding temporary admission under the ATA Carnet
 Appointment of Common Adjudicating Authority by DGRI - 2/2016-Customs

Sushila Agarwal, 08, Natraj Apartment, Patpar Ganj, New Delhi. Vs. ITO, Ward-36(3), New Delhi.
September, 30th 2015
             DELHI BENCH : SMC : NEW DELHI

                         ITA No.3531/Del/2014
                        Assessment Year : 2003-04

Sushila Agarwal,                   Vs.     ITO,
08, Natraj Apartment,                      Ward-36(3),
Patpar Ganj,                               New Delhi.
New Delhi.


     (Appellant)                             (Respondent)

           Appellant by : None
           Respondent by: Shri S.L. Anuragi, Sr.DR

           Date of Hearing      : 28.09.2015
           Date of Pronouncement: 28.09.2015


     This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order passed by the

CIT(A) on 20.2.2014 in relation to the Assessment Year 2003-04.

2.   When the matter was called up for hearing today, no one has appeared

on behalf of the assessee. The assessee has not filed any adjournment

application also. The notice of hearing sent to the assessee to the addressee
                                                              ITA No.3531/Del/2014   2

given at column No.10 of Form 36 has not been returned unserved. In

these circumstances, it appears that the assessee is not interested in

prosecuting her appeal. The appeal filed by the assessee is, therefore, liable

to be dismissed, for non-prosecution. Our above view finds support from

the following decisions:-

    1. CIT vs. B.N. Bhattachargee & anr., 118 ITR 461, wherein their
       Lordships have held:
           "The appeal does not mean merely filing of the appeal but
           effectively pursuing it."

    2. Estate of late Tukojirao Holkar vs. CWT, 223 ITR 480 (M.P.),
       wherein, while dismissing the reference made at the instance of the
       assessee   in   default,   their   Lordships   made    the   following
           "If the party, at whose instance the reference is made, fails to
           appear at the hearing, or fails in taking steps for preparation of
           the reference, the court is not bound to answer the reference."

    3. Commissioner of Income-tax vs. Multiplan India (P.) Ltd, 38 ITD
       320 (Del.),wherein the appeal filed by the revenue before the
       Tribunal, was fixed for hearing. But on the date of hearing nobody
       represented the revenue/appellant nor any communication for
       adjournment was received.          There was no communication or
       information as to why the revenue chose to remain absent on that
       date. The Tribunal on the basis of inherent powers, treated the
                                                             ITA No.3531/Del/2014   3

       appeal filed by the revenue as unadmitted in view of the provision
       of Rule 19 of the Income-tax (Appellate Tribunal) Rules, 1963.

3.     In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed for non-


      The decision was pronounced in the open court on 28th September,


                                                 (R.S. SYAL)
                                             ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

Dated: 28th September, 2015.


Copy forwarded to

1.   Appellant
2.   Respondent
3.   CIT
4.   CIT(A)
5.   DR
                                           Dy. Registrar, ITAT, New Delhi
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2016 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Integrated Software Solutions Integrated Software Development Integrated Software Services Integrated Software Solutions India Integrated Softw

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions