Latest Expert Exchange Queries
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
 
 
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Service Tax | Sales Tax | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Indirect Tax | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing
 
 
 
 
Popular Search: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: form 3cd :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: empanelment :: due date for vat payment :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: cpt :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: VAT RATES :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: VAT Audit :: TDS
 
 
From the Courts »
 Ravneet Takhar Vs. Commissioner Of Income Tax Ix And Ors.
 Jaiprakash Associates Ltd. Vs. Commissioner Of Income Tax
 Formula One World Championship Limited Vs. Commissioner Of Income Tax, International Taxation-3 And Anr.
 Commissioner Of Income Tax International Taxation-3 Delhi Vs. Formula One World Championship Ltd. And Anr.
 Reliance Communications Ltd vs. DDIT (ITAT Mumbai)
  Sushila Devi vs. CIT (Delhi High Court)
 Ashok Prapann Sharma vs. CIT (Supreme Court)a
  Vatsala Shenoy vs. JCIT (Supreme Court)
  Vatsala Shenoy vs. JCIT (Supreme Court)
 M.K.Overseas Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Pr.Commissioner Of Income Tax-06
 Arshia Ahmed Qureshi Vs. Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-21

Sh. Ajeet Singh S/o Sh. Jawahar Singh, Village Ikladi Post Office Keshopur Sathla, Distt. Bulandshahr (Up) Vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, Bulandshahr
September, 03rd 2015
                                                              ITA NO.4150/Del/2014


               IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
                      DELHI BENCH "A", NEW DELHI
               BEFORE SHRI H.S. SIDHU, JUDICIAL MEMBER
                                  AND
               SHRI T.S. KAPOOR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER


                    I.T.A. No. 4150/DEL/2014
                           A.Y. 2009-10
SH. AJEET SINGH                         INCOME TAX OFFICER,
S/O SH. JAWAHAR SINGH,             VS. WARD-1,
VILLAGE ­ IKLADI                        BULANDSHAHR
POST    OFFICE  ­   KESHOPUR
SATHLA,
DISTT. BULANDSHAHR (UP)
(PAN: AZMPS1720Q)
(APPELLANT)                                       (RESPONDENT)

         Assessee by                  :        SH. TARUN KUMAR, ADVOCATE
        Department by                 :        Sh. SUJIT KUMAR, SR. DR


                      Date of Hearing : 02-09-2015
                      Date of Order       : 02-09-2015
                                  ORDER
PER H.S. SIDHU : JM
     This appeal by the Assessee is directed against the order of the
Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Meerut dated 28.3.2014
pertaining to assessment year 2009-10 on the following grounds:-




          1.     That having regard to facts & circumstances of the
          case, Ld. CIT(A) has erred in law and on facts in passing
          the impugned order uls 250, without affording the proper
          opportunity and deserves to be set aside.

          2.     That having regard to facts & circumstances of the
          case, Ld. CIT(A) was not justified in passing an order of
          dismissal     of   appeal       by    rejecting   the   adjournment


                                      1
                                                      ITA NO.4150/Del/2014


           application of attorney, who was busy in pleading the
           time barring matters.

           3.    That having regard to facts & circumstances of the
           case, Ld. CIT (A) has erred in sustaining an addition of Rs
           12,00,000/-, deposited by appellant in his saving bank
           ale, of which source has been properly explained in
           assessment proceedings and evidences are available on
           record of A.O.

           4.    That the appellant craves the leave to add, amend,
           modify, delete any of the grounds of appeal before or at
           the time of hearing and all the above grounds are without
           prejudice to each other.

2.   The facts narrated by the revenue authorities are not disputed

by both the parties, hence, the same are not repeated here for the

sake of convenience.


3.   During the hearing, Ld. Counsel of the assessee, Shri Tarun

Kumar has stated that the Ld. CIT(A) has         not given sufficient

opportunity to the assessee for substantiating his claim before him.

Therefore, he requested that the order of the Ld CIT(A) may be set

aside.


4.   On the other hand, Ld. DR, Sh. Sujeet Kumar has relied upon

the order of the Ld. CIT(A).




                                   2
                                                         ITA NO.4150/Del/2014


5.   We have heard both the parties and perused the records,

especially the order of the Ld. CIT(A). For the sake of convenience,

we are reproducing the hereunder the findings of the Ld. CIT(A):-


          "2.   Following dates of hearing were allowed to the
                appellant:-

            Date      of Date fixed Remarks
            issue     of for hearing/
            notice       adjourned
                         date
            24.12.2013 16.1.2014      No compliance
            07.2.2014    21.2.2014    No compliance
            28.2.2014    19.3.2014     Adjournment   application
                                      was filed.
            19.3.2014    28.3.2014    Adjournment    application
                                      was received. The request
                                      for adjournment cannot be
                                      granted.
          3.   From the above it is evident that more than
          sufficient opportunities of being heard have been allowed
          to the appellant. However, the appellant either has not
          made       any   compliance     or   has   filed   adjournment
          application.     This implies   that the appellant is         not
          interested in pursuing the appeal for the reasons            best
          known to him. Therefore, the appeal is disposed off on
          the basis of material evidence on the record.




          4.    Since the appellant has not furnished any details
          and evidences against the additions made by the AO in
          the assessment order. Therefore, in the absence of the
          same, it is held that the AO was justified in making
          additions. The same          hereby confirmed. Grounds of
          appeal are dismissed."



                                   3
                                                              ITA NO.4150/Del/2014


5.1   After     hearing both the parties and perusing the aforesaid
finding of the Ld. CIT(A), we are of the view that no doubt that
assessee remained non-cooperative before the Ld. CIT(A), but on the
last date of hearing i.e. 28.3.2014, assessee filed the adjournment
application, which was not accepted by the Ld. CIT(A).                   In the
interest of justice, one more opportunity is required to be granted to
the   assessee     for   substantiating   his   claim    of    being     heard.
Accordingly, we remit back the issues in dispute to the file of the Ld.
CIT(A) with the directions to that one more opportunity may be
granted to the assessee of being heard, to substantiate his claim.
The Assessee is also directed to fully cooperate with the Ld. CIT(A)
and not to take unnecessary adjournment.

6.    In the result, the Appeal filed by the Assessee stands allowed
for statistical purposes.

      Order pronounced in the Open Court on 02/09/2015.

      Sd/-                                                      Sd/-


[T.S. KAPOOR]                                         [H.S. SIDHU]
ACCOUNTANT MEMBER                                  JUDICIAL MEMBER

Date 02/09/2015
"SRBHATNAGAR"
Copy forwarded to: -
1.    Appellant -
2.    Respondent -
3.    CIT
4.    CIT (A)
5.    DR, ITAT
                              TRUE COPY                         By Order,




                                                        Assistant Registrar,
                                                        ITAT, Delhi Benches

                                     4

 
 
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2016 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Software Reengineering Software Re-engineering Software Reverse Engineering Software Reverse Development Software Change Modulation Software Conversion Software Re-creation Software Re-development

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions