Latest Expert Exchange Queries
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
 
 
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Service Tax | Sales Tax | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Indirect Tax | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing
 
 
 
 
Popular Search: articles on VAT and GST in India :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: TDS :: form 3cd :: VAT Audit :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: cpt :: VAT RATES :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: empanelment :: due date for vat payment
 
 
From the Courts »
  Vatsala Shenoy vs. JCIT (Supreme Court)
  Vatsala Shenoy vs. JCIT (Supreme Court)
 M.K.Overseas Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Pr.Commissioner Of Income Tax-06
 Arshia Ahmed Qureshi Vs. Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-21
 CHAUDHARY SKIN TRADING COMPANY Vs. PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-21
  Sushila Devi vs. CIT (Delhi High Court)
  Vatsala Shenoy vs. JCIT (Supreme Court)
 Deputy Director Of Income Tax Vs. Virage Logic International
 Commissioner Of Income Tax-3 International Taxation Vs. Virage Logic International India
 Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-06 Vs. Moderate Leasing And Capital Services Pvt. Ltd.
 ITO vs. Vikram A. Pradhan (ITAT Mumbai)

M/s Krishna Engineers, C/o Vinod Kumar Goel, 282, Boundary Road,Civil Lines, Meerut Vs. ITO, WARD-1(3), New Delhi
September, 29th 2015
                     IN THE INCOME TAX APPELATE TRIBUNAL

                       DELHI BENCH "SMC-2": NEW DELHI

                   BEFORE SHRI H.S. SIDHU, JUDICIAL MEMBER

                                ITA No. 4453/Del/2014
                                    A.Y. : 2009-10

M/s Krishna Engineers,                           vs.   ITO, WARD-1(3),
C/o Vinod Kumar Goel,                                  New Delhi
282, Boundary Road,
Civil Lines, Meerut
(PAN : AAHFK8845Q)

(Appellant)                                                   (Respondent)

                     Assessee by        :        Sh. V.K. Goel, Advocate
                     Department by      :        Sh. Sudhiranjan Senapati, Sr. DR


                           Date of Hearing : 03-8-2015
                           Date of Order        : 28-9-2015
PER H.S. SIDHU: JM
                                       ORDER


     This appeal by the Assessee is directed against the Order of the
Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Meerut dated 03.3.2014
pertaining to assessment year 2009-10.




2.   The grounds of appeal read as under:-

              1.       That the Ld. CIT(A) has passed the order without
                     providing an opportunity being heard after written
                     submission filed by the assessee. Hence,                 order
                     passed by      CIT(A) is against the principle of natural
                     justice.


                                            1
           2.   That without prejudice to ground no. 1, Ld. AO as well
                as CIT(A) is in error that Section 44AD is applicable
                when gross turnover is Rs. 99,75,420/- i.e., over and
                above Rs. 40,00,000/- provision           of Section 44AD is
                applicable.     Hence, addition made by the AO and
                confirm by the CIT(A) @8% by invoking provision of
                section 44AD is bad and not according to law.

           3.   That the assessee has right to add, delete or modify
                any grounds during the appeal proceeding.

3.   The facts narrated by the revenue authorities are not disputed
by both the parties, therefore, the same are not repeated here for the
sake of convenience.

4.   I have heard both the parties and perused the orders passed by
the Revenue Authorities alongwith the relevant records available with
the Appeal filed. I find that that in the Grounds of Appeal vide ground
No. 1 assessee has submitted that           Ld. CIT(A) has passed the order
without providing any opportunity being heard after written submission
filed by the assessee, hence, order passed by CIT(A) is against the
principle of natural justice. After perusing the impugned order passed
by the Ld. CIT(A), I find that the Ld. CIT(A has first reproduced the
assessment order; secondly reproduced the grounds of appeal raised
by   the   assessee    before   him;       thirdly   reproduced   the   written
submissions filed by the assessee in DAK and then passed the
impugned order and decided the issue in dispute against the assessee,
without giving any opportunity of hearing to the assessee. Therefore,
the impugned order is not sustainable in the eyes of law.           Therefore,
in the interest of justice and in my considered opinion, Ld. CIT(A) has

                                       2
erred in this regard. Ld. CIT(A) should have adjudicated the issue after
providing adequate         opportunity        of being heard personally             to the
assessee or his authorized representative. It is a settled law that even
the administrative orders have to be consistent with the rules of
natural justice. Hence, I am of the view that in this case the issues in
dispute needs to be remitted back to the file of the Ld. CIT(A) to decide
the same afresh, as per law, after giving adequate opportunity of being
heard to the assessee.           Accordingly, Ld. CIT(A) is directed to consider
the issues in dispute       afresh and pass a proper and speaking order
considering    the      merits    of   the        case,   after   providing    adequate
opportunity of being heard to the assessee.




5.     In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands allowed for

statistical purposes.

        Order pronounced in the open court on 28/9/2015.
                                                                                    Sd/-

                                                                            [H.S. SIDHU]
                                                                      JUDICIAL MEMBER
Date: 28/9/2015
SRBhatnagar
Copy forwarded to: -
1.     Appellant   2.     Respondent         3.    CIT    4.CIT (A)     5.    DR, ITAT
                                  TRUE COPY                             By Order,




                                          Assistant Registrar, ITAT, Delhi Benches




                                             3
4

 
 
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2016 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Enterprise Resource Planning Solutions ERP Solutions Enterprise Resource Planning Software Solutions ERP Software Solutions Supply Chain Management Solutions SCM Solutions Supply Chain Management Software Solutions SCM Software Solutions Enterprise Resource Planning Solutions India ERP Solutions India Enterprise Resource Planning Software Solutions India ERP Software Solutions India Supply Chain Management Solutions India SCM Solutions India Supply Chain Management Software Solutions India SCM Software Solutions India

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions