Latest Expert Exchange Queries

GST Demo Service software link: https://ims.go2customer.com
Username: demouser Password: demopass
Get your inventory and invoicing software GST Ready from Binarysoft info@binarysoft.com
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
 
 
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing | GST - Goods and Services Tax
 
 
 
 
Popular Search: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: cpt :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: TDS :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: due date for vat payment :: empanelment :: form 3cd :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: VAT Audit :: VAT RATES :: list of goods taxed at 4%
 
 
« Indirect Tax »
 Indirect taxes collection could fall short of target due to GST
 Indirect Tax Collection Under Gst Goes Down By 30 Percent
 What is a belated income tax return and what are its consequences
 Why rejig of financial year could upset your tax planning
 The threat of harsh penalty should not impede tax compliance
 What are the tax exemption limits for allowances, reimbursements paid to employees? Find out
 High-income taxpayers to get priority treatment and extra facilities
 GST input tax credit rules: How taxpayers will benefit from ITC
 More complications in filing income tax returns
 Guidelines for selection of cases for scrutiny during the financial-year 2017-2018
 CBDT asks Income Tax officials to pull their socks up as revenue collection not satisfactory

Tax tribunal assault on judiciarys freedom: SC
September, 26th 2014

The Supreme Court on Thursday struck down National Tax Tribunal (NTT) Act, enacted by the UPA-1 regime to set up a tribunal that would function like the National Green Tribunal in the taxation field, saying the legislation was not only unconstitutional but also the worst form of assault on judiciary's independence.

A five-judge constitution bench comprising Chief Justice R M Lodha and Justices J S Khehar, J Chelameswar, A K Sikri and R F Nariman unanimously found NTT Act, 2005 to be a naked attempt to hit at judiciary's independence as the central government would on one hand litigate in every case before the NTT and on the other hand, decide appointment, transfer and extension of service of NTT chairman and members.

Two judgments — a 227-page decision authored by Justice Khehar for himself and three others and a supplementary, concurring 43-page view penned by Justice Nariman for himself — had a common thread that it was a gross attempt to denude the authority of high courts and put up an alternative adjudicatory forum in NTT, which could be easily manoeuvered by the central government.

Nariman put it rather bluntly, "The National Tax Tribunal Act is unconstitutional, being the ultimate encroachment on the exclusive domain of the superior courts of record in India."

The UPA government had introduced the bill in Parliament with a four-point objective — to reduce pendency of cases and huge arrears in high courts all over the country, huge tax recovery held up in litigation before various high courts, to have uniformity of interpretation of tax law, as there were different opinions between high courts. Finally, judges who came from civil courts were not well-versed to decide complicated tax issues.

The bench said legislature had the power to create alternative forums and vest it with adjudicatory powers but at the same time, it had to maintain identical conditions of service and independence of members of the new forum as applicable to high court judges in deciding the disputes.

The apex court was aghast to find that while the government would be a stakeholder in every case before the NTT, the appointment, transfer and extension of service of its chairperson and members would be decided by secretaries to the government, thus creating a huge conflict of interest and an inescapable conclusion that the litigant would be in a position to influence the justice delivery mechanism.

It also objected to the provision making chartered accountants and company secretaries as well as customs collectors with some years of experience eligible to become technical members of NTT.

 
 
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2017 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Binarysoft Technologies - Our Experience

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions