Latest Expert Exchange Queries
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Service Tax | Sales Tax | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Indirect Tax | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing
Popular Search: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: VAT RATES :: form 3cd :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: due date for vat payment :: cpt :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: empanelment :: VAT Audit :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: TDS :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4%
« From the Courts »
  Dr. Gautam Sen vs. CCIT (Bombay High Court)
 Dr. Gautam Sen vs. CCIT (Bombay High Court)
 DCIT vs. Shivshankar R. Sharma (ITAT Mumbai)
 ACIT vs. Jawaharlal Agicha (ITAT Mumbai)
 CIT vs. M/s. D. Chetan & Co (Bombay High Court)
 Makes further amendments to Notification no. 157/90-Customs dated 28th March, 1990 regarding temporary admission under the ATA Carnet
 Appointment of Common Adjudicating Authority by DGRI - 2/2016-Customs
 ransfers Of Hon’ble Members Of The ITAT (September 2016)
 M. G. Contractors Pvt. Ltd vs. DCIT (ITAT Delhi)
 Haryana State Road & Bridges Development Corporation Ltd vs. CIT (P&H High Court)
 Dharamshibhai Sonani vs. DCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad)

M/s. Innobyte Systems (P) Ltd., 1 F / 93, NIT FARIDABAD. Vs. ITO, Ward 11 (4), New Delhi.
September, 19th 2014
               (DELHI BENCH `C' : NEW DELHI)


                        ITA No.3904/Del./2013
                      (Assessment Year : 2001-02)

M/s. Innobyte Systems (P) Ltd.,               vs.    ITO, Ward 11 (4),
1 F / 93, NIT                                        New Delhi.

       (PAN : AAACI2229Q)

       (Appellant)                                   (Respondent)

                Assessee by : Shri K.V.S. Gupta, Advocate
                Revenue by : Shri Satpal Singh, Senior DR



       This appeal filed by the assessee emanates from the order of CIT
(Appeals)-XV, New Delhi dated 22.12.2011.

2.     In this case, the Assessing Officer received an information from the
Investigation Wing that assessee has taken bogus accommodation entries. The
case was reopened by issuing notice u/s 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 after
recording the reasons. The Assessing Officer has also called information u/s
133(6) of the Act during the assessment proceedings wherein the bank has
confirmed the instrument number through which the accommodation entry was
provided by M/s. H.B. Relan and Coy. and credited to the assessee's account.
The assessee filed an appeal and the CIT (A) has confirmed the addition by
holding as under :-
                                         2                  ITA No.3904/Del/2013

       "7.5 Accordingly, since the appellant has not discharged the
     initial onus of proving the genuineness of the transaction with
     HB Relan and Co. and also in view of the fact that appellant is
     not engaged in the business of investment and financing and no
     details of share/securities sold through HB Relan and Co. were
     made available, hence in these circumstances I hold that the
     money received in appellant's bank account to the tune of
     Rs.10,11,210 is to be treated as unexplained credit and it calls for
     the addition under section 68 of the Act."

3.     We have heard both the sides on the issue. It was pleaded before us that
this company was taken over by present management in the year 2004. They
could not collect the copies of balance sheet, books of account and other
documents from the earlier management. It was also claimed before us that
material or evidences collected by Assessing Officer were not confronted to the
assessee with regard to the genuineness of transactions. After hearing both the
sides on the issue and considering the relevant material on record, we are of the
view that in the interest of justice and equity, this issue requires a relook at the
level of Assessing Officer wherein the assessee shall submit necessary
documents asked for. Accordingly, we restore this issue back to the file of the
Assessing Officer for deciding afresh after providing an opportunity of being
heard to the assessee.

4.     In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical
Order pronounced in open court on this 15th day of September, 2014.

               Sd/-                                        sd/-
         (I.C. SUDHIR)                               (B.C. MEENA)
       JUDICIAL MEMBER                          ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

Dated the 15th day of September, 2014
                               3   ITA No.3904/Del/2013

Copy forwarded to:
     4.CIT(A)-XV, New Delhi.
     5.CIT(ITAT), New Delhi.                 AR/ITAT
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2016 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Binarysoft Technologies - We Bring IT. Offshore software outsourcing company. We use Global Delivery Model (GDM) and believe in Follow The Sun principle

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions