Latest Expert Exchange Queries

GST Demo Service software link: https://ims.go2customer.com
Username: demouser Password: demopass
Get your inventory and invoicing software GST Ready from Binarysoft info@binarysoft.com
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
 
 
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing | GST - Goods and Services Tax
 
 
 
 
Popular Search: list of goods taxed at 4% :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: form 3cd :: empanelment :: VAT Audit :: TDS :: due date for vat payment :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: VAT RATES :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: cpt :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD
 
 
From the Courts »
 CIT vs. ITD CEM India JV (Bombay High Court)
 Rajasthan Tax Consultants Association vs. UOI (Rajasthan High Court)
  H.T. MEDIA LIMITED Vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-IV, NEW DELHI
 Commissioner Of Income Tax (Ltu), New Delhi Vs. Oriental Insurance Company Ltd.
 Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central)-2 Vs. Index Securities Private Limited
 Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Ahmedabad Benches, Ahmedabad Constitution For The Period From 18/09/2017 To 22/09/2017
  M/s Brothers & Sisters Enterprise vs. JCIT (ITAT Kolkata)
  Commissioner Of Income Tax, Delhi-Iv Vs. DLF Universal Ltd.
 Commissioner Of Income Tax, Delhi-Iv Vs. DLF Universal Ltd.
 Jcb India Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax &
 Saheb Ram Om Prakash Marketing Pvt Ltd Vs. Commissioner Of Income Tax & ORS

M/s. Gratings (India) Private Ltd., C 2/20, Safdarjung Dev. Area, New Delhi 110 016. Vs. ITO, Ward 12 (2), New Delhi.
September, 22nd 2014
           IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
                (DELHI BENCH `C' : NEW DELHI)

        BEFORE SHRI I.C. SUDHIR, JUDICIAL MEMBER
                            and
         SHRI B.C. MEENA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

                        ITA No.5184/Del./2012
                      (Assessment Year : 2006-07)

M/s. Gratings (India) Private Ltd.,         vs.    ITO, Ward 12 (2),
C ­ 2/20, Safdarjung Dev. Area,                    New Delhi.
New Delhi ­ 110 016.

      (PAN : AAACG3520A)

       (Appellant)                                 (Respondent)

               Assessee by : Shri Satish Khosla, Advocate
               Revenue by : Shri Satpal Singh, Senior DR

                                      ORDER

PER B.C. MEENA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER :

      This appeal filed by the assessee emanates from the order of CIT

(Appeals)-VIII, New Delhi dated 09.07.2012 for the Assessment Year

2006-07.

2.    The grounds of appeal taken by the assessee read as under :-

      "1. That the Ld. CIT (A) erred in not admitting the
      additional evidences filed before him.

      1(a) That the Ld. CIT (A) ought to have appreciated that
      in the books of account credit was inadvertently shown in
      the name of the sister of the Director (Mrs. Inshiya Sheikh)
      whereas it represented credit from her husband, Shri Asad
      Ul Islam Sayed.
                                    2                ITA No.5184/Del/2012





      2.    The Ld. CIT (A) erred in confirming the addition of
      Rs.12 lacs u/s. 68 of the I.T. Act, 1961.


3.    The assessee has submitted an application under Rule 29 of the

Income-tax Rules, 1962.

4.    We have heard both the sides on the issue. In our considered view,

we hold that in the interest of justice and equity, the admission of

additional evidences is necessary. Therefore, we admit these additional

evidences which were not admitted by the CIT (A). After admitting these

additional evidences, we remit the issues to the file of the CIT (A) to be

decided afresh after considering these additional evidences which have

been admitted after providing an opportunity of being heard to the

assessee.

5.    In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical

purposes.




Order pronounced in open court on this 16th day of September, 2014.



              Sd/-                                   sd/-
        (I.C. SUDHIR)                          (B.C. MEENA)
      JUDICIAL MEMBER                     ACCOUNTANT MEMBER


Dated the 16th day of September, 2014
TS
                                 3   ITA No.5184/Del/2012



Copy forwarded to:
     1.Appellant
     2.Respondent
     3.CIT
     4.CIT(A)-VIII, New Delhi.
     5.CIT(ITAT), New Delhi.                   AR/ITAT

 
 
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2017 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Desktop Application Development Outsourcing Desktop Application Development Offshore Desk

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions