Latest Expert Exchange Queries

GST Demo Service software link:
Username: demouser Password: demopass
Get your inventory and invoicing software GST Ready from Binarysoft
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing | GST - Goods and Services Tax
Popular Search: list of goods taxed at 4% :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: TDS :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: empanelment :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: form 3cd :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: VAT RATES :: cpt :: due date for vat payment :: VAT Audit
From the Courts »
 Shri Rakesh Kumar Gupta Vs. The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Xiii & Anr.
 Central Board Of Direct Taxes Vs. Satya Narain Shukla
 Meena Rastogi Vs. Central Board Of Direct Taxes, & Anr.
 Siddharth Rastogi Vs. Central Board Of Direct Taxes, Union Of India, Ministry Of Finance, Department Of Revenue & Anr.
 ITO vs. NVS Builders Pvt. Ltd (ITAT Delhi)
 Approva Systems Pvt. Ltd vs. DCIT (ITAT Pune)
 Procter & Gamble Home Products Pvt. Ltd vs. ITAT (Bombay High Court)
 Virag Tiwari Vs. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-21 & Others
  Anand Agarwal vs. Vilas Chandrakant Gaokar (Bombay High Court)
 Maxopp Investment Ltd vs. CIT (Supreme Court)
 Order of a Four-Member Appellate Authority constituted under Chartered Accountants Act is Valid: Delhi HC

DCIT, Circle - 9(3) Room No. 229, 2nd Floor Aayakar Bhavan, M.K. Road Mumbai 400020 Vs. Ghisulal D. Rathod C/o. Cello Plastic Industires Works 5, Vakil Industrial Estate, Walbhat Road, Goregoan (E), Mumbai 400063
September, 23rd 2014
                         "G" Bench, Mumbai

                Before Shri D. Manmohan, Vice President
            and Shri D. Karunakara Rao, Accountant Member

                         ITA No. 5092/Mum/2011
                         (Assessment Year: 2004-05)

 DCIT, Circle - 9(3)             Ghisulal D. Rathod
 Room No. 229, 2nd Floor         C/o. Cello Plastic Industires Works
 Aayakar Bhavan, M.K. Road       5, Vakil Industrial Estate, Walbhat
 Mumbai 400020                   Road, Goregoan (E), Mumbai 400063
                         PAN - AAAPR5527K
          Appellant                           Respondent

                   Appellant by:    Shri Vivek Batra
                   Respondent by:   Shri Dhiren K. Rathore
                                    & Shri Nitesh Joshi

                   Date of Hearing:       22.09.2014
                   Date of Pronouncement: 22.09.2014


Per D. Manmohan, V.P.

     This appeal by the Revenue is directed against the order passed by the
CIT(A)-20, Mumbai and it pertains to AY 2004-05.

2.    The only ground urged by the Revenue reads as under: -

     "On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld.
     CIT(A) erred in deleting the addition of `18,01,728 disallowed by the
     Assessing Officer, overlooking the fact that the assessee had paid the
     taxes @10% on LTCG computed without indexation of its cost (book
     gain) at `15,30,144 instead of `33,31,872."

3.    Facts necessary for disposal of the appeal are stated in brief. During
the previous year relevant to the assessment year under consideration
assessee sold certain shares and earned long term capital gains. There are
in all 32 transactions. Assessee declared book gain of `11,84,425/- and paid
tax @ 10% under section 112 of the Act. The AO noticed that the book gain
works out to `33,31,872/- and after set off of carry forward of LTC loss of
`4,92,769/- assessee was to pay tax of a sum of `2,80,910/-. In the opinion
                                       2                 ITA No. 5092/Mum/2011
                                                               Ghisulal D. Rathod

of the AO, while computing the book gain, assessee is not entitled to adjust
the indexed loss. Therefore, in the proceedings under section 148 of the Act
he recomputed the capital gains.

4.    On an appeal filed by the assessee the learned CIT(A) relied upon the
decision of the Hon'ble Bombay High Court in the case of Anuj A. Sheth
(HUF) 324 ITR 191 to hold that the 32 transactions are independent, and
entered at different points of time, and hence the assessee is entitled to
claim set off of the loss from other shares.

5.    Aggrieved, Revenue is in appeal before us. At the time of hearing the
learned counsel for the assessee relied upon the decision of the Hon'ble
Bombay High Court (supra), wherein identical issue was considered and the
Hon'ble Court observed that the benefit of set off cannot be denied to
assessee merely because he has opted to be taxed under section 112 of the
Act in respect of certain shares.

6.    The learned D.R. could not point out that the decision of the Hon'ble
Bombay High Court is not applicable to the facts of the case or could
highlight that a contrary view was taken on this matter either by Supreme
Court or any High Court.

7.    Under these circumstances we are of the view that the order passed
by the learned CIT(A), being in consonance with the view taken by the
Hon'ble Bombay High Court, does not call for any interference.

8.    In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed.

Order pronounced in the open court on 22nd September, 2014.

                Sd/-                                     Sd/-
        (D. Karunakara Rao)                        (D. Manmohan)
        Accountant Member                           Vice President

Mumbai, Dated: 22nd September, 2014
                                       3                 ITA No. 5092/Mum/2011
                                                               Ghisulal D. Rathod

Copy to:

   1.   The   Appellant
   2.   The   Respondent
   3.   The   CIT(A) ­ 20, Mumbai
   4.   The   CIT­ 9, Mumbai City
   5.   The   DR, "G" Bench, ITAT, Mumbai

                                                      By Order

//True Copy//
                                                   Assistant Registrar
                                           ITAT, Mumbai Benches, Mumbai
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2018 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
SEO Services SEO LLC e-boost Search Engine Optimization Services Internet Marketing Services Website Placement Services On-site Webs

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions