Latest Expert Exchange Queries

GST Demo Service software link:
Username: demouser Password: demopass
Get your inventory and invoicing software GST Ready from Binarysoft
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing | GST - Goods and Services Tax
Popular Search: due date for vat payment :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: VAT RATES :: TDS :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: empanelment :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: VAT Audit :: cpt :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: form 3cd
 ICAI has clarified that there is no error in the results of CA Final examination held in November 2017 declared on Jan. 17,
 Exposure Draft of Appendix C, Uncertainty over Income Tax Treatments to Ind AS 12, Income Taxes
 Group to study how Government Departments deal with non-performing employees and to identify non-performers in ICAI
 Result of the Chartered Accountants Final Examination held in November 2017 and Common Proficiency Test (CPT) held in December 2017 declared.
 Result of the Information Systems Audit [ISA] Assessment Test held on 23rd December 2017 declared.
 Result of the Chartered Accountants Final Examination held in November 2017 and Common Proficiency Test (CPT) held in December 2017 and the ISA-AT held in December 2017 are likely to be declared on Wednesday, the 17th January 2018
 Ind AS Transition Facilitation Group (ITFG) Clarification Bulletin 13
 CPE Events 15 January - 20 January 2018
 Result of the Information Systems Audit [ISA] Assessment Test held on 23rd December 2017 is likely to be declared on 17th January, 2018.
 Result of the Chartered Accountants Final Examination held in November 2017 and Common Proficiency Test (CPT) held in December 2017 are likely to be declared on Wednesday, the 17th January 2018.
 Clarifications on the requirement for completion of Advanced ICITSS course and the Advanced IT Test thereunder, with reference to eligibility to appear in CA Final examination, under Final( Old) and Final (New) Syllabus.

Comments on Exposure Draft on Investment Entities: Applying the Consolidated Exception (Proposed Amendments to IFRS 10 and IAS 28)
September, 15th 2014
           UTE OF CHART
 THE INSTITU                A    NTANTS
                      TERED ACCOUN           DIA
                                      S OF IND

                  ments of the Institute of
               Comm                                 d Accountan
                                          f Chartered         nts of India on

                  o Investme
   Exposure Draft on                               he Consolida
                           ent Entities: Applying th                     ion (Propose
                                                              ated Excepti          ed
                                mendments to
                               am                    a IAS 28)
                                           o IFRS 10 and

       n 1--Exemp
Question                   p
                ption from preparing            d financial statements

The IASB              t amend IFR
          B proposes to           RS 10 to con            he exemption
                                              nfirm that th                     aring consolidated
                                                                     n from prepa
financial statements set out in paragraph    (a) of IFRS 10 continue
                                            4(                                  ailable to a parent
                                                                     es to be ava             p
         at is a subsidiary of an investment entity, even when the in
entity tha                                                           nvestment entity measur  res its
subsidiar             v
         ries at fair value in accordance witth paragraph            S 10. Do yo
                                                          h 31 of IFRS          ou agree wi  ith the
proposed d amendment? Why or why w not?


We agree with the proposed   ammendment in n IFRS 10 as the objec ct of paragr           ill be
                                                                              raph 4(a) wi
       d from the pe
enhanced                       f intermedia
                   erspective of                                  ent entity.
                                          ate parent of an investme

 Questio          bsidiary that provides
        on 2--A sub                                hat relate to
                                       s services th                     nt's investm
                                                               o the paren          ment

 The IASSB proposes             I
                     s to amend IFRS    10 to clarify
                                               c            imited situat
                                                       the li                        ch paragraph
                                                                         tions in whic             h 32
 applies. The IASB proposes th   hat the requ  uirement for r an investm             t consolida
                                                                        ment entity to            ate a
        ary, instead of
 subsidia            o measuring g it at fair va
                                               alue, applies             se subsidiari
                                                            s only to thos                        a an

                                                                                  ies that act as
        on of the op
 extensio                         t investme
                    perations of the                        arent, and do
                                                ent entity pa             o not themselves qualif fy as
       ment entities. The main purpose
 investm                        p          of suuch a subsiddiary is to prrovide support services that
        t the inve
 relate to           estment ent tity's invest  tment activvities (which  h may inc clude provid   ding
       ment-related services to third parties). Do you agree with the propose
 investm                                                                              ed amendment?
 Why or why not?


    We agree to the proposed am              H
                                mendment. However,       he use of the word `and' in paragrap
                                                        th                                     ph 32
    as given below could create e more than one interpre                          s
                                                         etation such that if the subsidiary is non-
       estment entit
    inve            ty and is nott an extensio           perations of the investm
                                              on of the op                                    p
                                                                                 ment entity parent
       n it will have
    then                        ured at fair value.
                    e to be measu            v
           UTE OF CHART
 THE INSTITU                A    NTANTS
                      TERED ACCOUN           DIA
                                      S OF IND

        "32 Notwithstanding the requirement                  aph 31, if an
                                                    in paragra            a investme               h a
                                                                                       ent entity has
        subssidiary that provides is not itself ann investmennt entity andd whose ma   ain purpose is to
        prov            s that relate to the inves
            vide services                        stment entityy's investme             s (see paragr
                                                                          ent activities           raphs
        B85C­B85E), it               olidate that subsidiary in
                         t shall conso                       i accordanc  ce with para agraphs 19­226 of
        this IFRS and appply the requuirements of             he acquisitio
                                                 f IFRS 3 to th           on of any suc            y."
                                                                                       ch subsidiary

It is sugg            t IASB may
          gested that the       m amend th    he above pa              r
                                                          aragraph to require                  idiary
                                                                               that if the subsi
          n an investm
itself is not                                ment entity pa
                      ment entity, the investm                         onsolidate th
                                                          arent shall co                       ry.
                                                                                   hat subsidiar

       on 3--Appli              he equity method
                    ication of th         m                               y investor to
                                                 by a non-investment entity           o an
       ment entity investee
 investm           i

       SB proposes
 The IAS                     AS 28 to:
                 s to amend IA

            require a no
        (a) r                     nt entity inv
                       on-investmen                                   a
                                              vestor to retain, when applying  the equity meth  hod,
            t fair valu          ment applied by an inves
                       ue measurem                                    y associate to
                                                          stment entity                         ts in
                                                                                   o its interest
            s           ; and

            clarify that a non-invest
        (b) c                                  y investor th
                                    tment entity                        t venturer in
                                                           hat is a joint           n a joint vennture
            t           nvestment en
                 is an in           ntity cannot, when appllying the equity method  d, retain the fair
            v      measuurement appplied by the investment t entity joint           o its interest
                                                                         t venture to            ts in

                   t proposed
 Do you agree with the               nts? Why or why
                            d amendmen           w not?


       e with the pr
We agree                     endment. We
                   roposed ame                    ver to menti
                                       e wish howev                       wing:
                                                             ion the follow

   I.      The principle of consiste
           T                          ent measureement for co ontrol and jo
                                                                          oint control does
                                                                                        d           em to
                                                                                              not see
           have  been ap pplied in caase of acqui             dditional inte
                                                  isition of ad            erests in joint operationn that
           c                         w
                        a business which     requi
                                                 ires goodwil  ll to be reccognised on n each addit tional
           acquition wh              he case when
                        hich is not th           n an entity has
                                                              h control ov ver a subsiddiary and acqquires
           a            nterests. Hen
                       in             nce, if the objective ofo the above  e amendme   ent of requ  uiring
           unwinding     he fair valu
                        th           ue measurem ment used by b a joint venture is to  o have consi  istent
           m             t principles between co ontrol and jooint control, such an obj            uld be
                                                                                        jective shou
           f         uni             a the IFRSs
                        iversally in all         s.
          UTE OF CHART
THE INSTITU                A    NTANTS
                     TERED ACCOUN           DIA
                                     S OF IND

II.   The proposed
      T            d amendmen                                         f an entity in unwindin
                                nt considers the practical difficulty for                     ng the
      f value measurement used by an investment entity assoc                      y be noted th
                                                                      ciate. It may           hat as
      p IAS 28, a joint vent
      per                                    a
                                ture is also accounted   n equity me
                                                        on            ethod. Thus, similar pracctical
      difficulties w be faced
                   will        d by a ventur rer in unwinding the fairr value meas surement useed by
      t joint vent  ture. Therefo
                               fore, IASB may
                                            m consider  r to have a un            ciple of prov
                                                                       niform princ           viding
      relief       u
             from unwinding    of
                               o fair value  e measureme ent to invest tments that are accounted as
      p equity method,
      per         m                                     v
                           such as associates and joint ventures.
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2018 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Integrated Software Solutions Integrated Software Development Integrated Software Services Integrated Software Solutions India Integrated Softw

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions