Latest Expert Exchange Queries
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
 
 
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Service Tax | Sales Tax | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Indirect Tax | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing
 
 
 
 
Popular Search: VAT Audit :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: empanelment :: form 3cd :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: TDS :: VAT RATES :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: cpt :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: due date for vat payment :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes
 
 
ICAI »
  Syllabus for the Limited Insolvency Examination on 31st December, 2016 to become Insolvency Professional
 Extension of last date for submission of application forms for Information Systems Audit-Assessment Test (ISA-AT), upto 10th December 2016.
 Four Weeks Residential Programme to be held from 28th January, 2017 to 24th February, 2017 at Centre of Excellence, Hyderabad for Women Participants only.
 CPE Events 5th December - 10th December 2016
 Here's how your employer can help you save tax
 Introduction of facility for online submission of requests for issue of duplicate mark sheets/pass certificates.
 ICAI invites suggestions on revised Model GST Law
 Guidance Note on Reports in Company Prospectuses (Revised 2016) issued by the Auditing and Assurance Standards Board
 President's Message - December 2016
 Ind AS Transition Facilitation Group (ITFG) Clarification Bulletin 6
 Announcement regarding registration as an Insolvency Professional with the Indian Institute of Insolvency Professionals of ICAI

Comments on Exposure Draft on Investment Entities: Applying the Consolidated Exception (Proposed Amendments to IFRS 10 and IAS 28)
September, 15th 2014
           UTE OF CHART
 THE INSTITU                A    NTANTS
                      TERED ACCOUN           DIA
                                      S OF IND


                  ments of the Institute of
               Comm                                 d Accountan
                                          f Chartered         nts of India on

                  o Investme
   Exposure Draft on                               he Consolida
                           ent Entities: Applying th                     ion (Propose
                                                              ated Excepti          ed
                                mendments to
                               am                    a IAS 28)
                                           o IFRS 10 and



       n 1--Exemp
Question                   p
                ption from preparing            d financial statements
                                     consolidated

The IASB              t amend IFR
          B proposes to           RS 10 to con            he exemption
                                              nfirm that th                     aring consolidated
                                                                     n from prepa
                                 p
financial statements set out in paragraph    (a) of IFRS 10 continue
                                            4(                                  ailable to a parent
                                                                     es to be ava             p
         at is a subsidiary of an investment entity, even when the in
entity tha                                                           nvestment entity measur  res its
subsidiar             v
         ries at fair value in accordance witth paragraph            S 10. Do yo
                                                          h 31 of IFRS          ou agree wi  ith the
proposed d amendment? Why or why w not?


       e:
Response

                   p
We agree with the proposed   ammendment in n IFRS 10 as the objec ct of paragr           ill be
                                                                              raph 4(a) wi
       d from the pe
enhanced                       f intermedia
                   erspective of                                  ent entity.
                                          ate parent of an investme


 Questio          bsidiary that provides
        on 2--A sub                                hat relate to
                                       s services th                     nt's investm
                                                               o the paren          ment
         es
 activitie

 The IASSB proposes             I
                     s to amend IFRS    10 to clarify
                                               c            imited situat
                                                       the li                        ch paragraph
                                                                         tions in whic             h 32
 applies. The IASB proposes th   hat the requ  uirement for r an investm             t consolida
                                                                        ment entity to            ate a
        ary, instead of
 subsidia            o measuring g it at fair va
                                               alue, applies             se subsidiari
                                                            s only to thos                        a an



                                                                                  ies that act as
        on of the op
 extensio                         t investme
                    perations of the                        arent, and do
                                                ent entity pa             o not themselves qualif fy as
       ment entities. The main purpose
 investm                        p          of suuch a subsiddiary is to prrovide support services that
        t the inve
 relate to           estment ent tity's invest  tment activvities (which  h may inc clude provid   ding
       ment-related services to third parties). Do you agree with the propose
 investm                                                                              ed amendment?
 Why or why not?



       e:
Response

    We agree to the proposed am              H
                                mendment. However,       he use of the word `and' in paragrap
                                                        th                                     ph 32
    as given below could create e more than one interpre                          s
                                                         etation such that if the subsidiary is non-
       estment entit
    inve            ty and is nott an extensio           perations of the investm
                                              on of the op                                    p
                                                                                 ment entity parent
       n it will have
    then                        ured at fair value.
                    e to be measu            v
           UTE OF CHART
 THE INSTITU                A    NTANTS
                      TERED ACCOUN           DIA
                                      S OF IND


                                     r
        "32 Notwithstanding the requirement                  aph 31, if an
                                                    in paragra            a investme               h a
                                                                                       ent entity has
        subssidiary that provides is not itself ann investmennt entity andd whose ma   ain purpose is to
        prov            s that relate to the inves
            vide services                        stment entityy's investme             s (see paragr
                                                                          ent activities           raphs
        B85C­B85E), it               olidate that subsidiary in
                         t shall conso                       i accordanc  ce with para agraphs 19­226 of
        this IFRS and appply the requuirements of             he acquisitio
                                                 f IFRS 3 to th           on of any suc            y."
                                                                                       ch subsidiary


It is sugg            t IASB may
          gested that the       m amend th    he above pa              r
                                                          aragraph to require                  idiary
                                                                               that if the subsi
          n an investm
itself is not                                ment entity pa
                      ment entity, the investm                         onsolidate th
                                                          arent shall co                       ry.
                                                                                   hat subsidiar



 Questio
       on 3--Appli              he equity method
                    ication of th         m                               y investor to
                                                 by a non-investment entity           o an
       ment entity investee
 investm           i

       SB proposes
 The IAS                     AS 28 to:
                 s to amend IA

            require a no
        (a) r                     nt entity inv
                       on-investmen                                   a
                                              vestor to retain, when applying  the equity meth  hod,
            the
            t fair valu          ment applied by an inves
                       ue measurem                                    y associate to
                                                          stment entity                         ts in
                                                                                   o its interest
            s           ; and
            subsidiaries;

            clarify that a non-invest
        (b) c                                  y investor th
                                    tment entity                        t venturer in
                                                           hat is a joint           n a joint vennture
            that
            t           nvestment en
                 is an in           ntity cannot, when appllying the equity method  d, retain the fair
            value
            v      measuurement appplied by the investment t entity joint           o its interest
                                                                         t venture to            ts in
            s
            subsidiaries..

                   t proposed
 Do you agree with the               nts? Why or why
                            d amendmen           w not?






       e:
Response

       e with the pr
We agree                     endment. We
                   roposed ame                    ver to menti
                                       e wish howev                       wing:
                                                             ion the follow

   I.      The principle of consiste
           T                          ent measureement for co ontrol and jo
                                                                          oint control does
                                                                                        d           em to
                                                                                              not see
           h
           have  been ap pplied in caase of acqui             dditional inte
                                                  isition of ad            erests in joint operationn that
           constitutes
           c                         w
                        a business which     requi
                                                 ires goodwil  ll to be reccognised on n each addit tional
           a
           acquition wh              he case when
                        hich is not th           n an entity has
                                                              h control ov ver a subsiddiary and acqquires
           additional
           a            nterests. Hen
                       in             nce, if the objective ofo the above  e amendme   ent of requ  uiring
           u
           unwinding     he fair valu
                        th           ue measurem ment used by b a joint venture is to  o have consi  istent
           measuremen
           m             t principles between co ontrol and jooint control, such an obj            uld be
                                                                                        jective shou
           followed
           f         uni             a the IFRSs
                        iversally in all         s.
          UTE OF CHART
THE INSTITU                A    NTANTS
                     TERED ACCOUN           DIA
                                     S OF IND

II.   The proposed
      T            d amendmen                                         f an entity in unwindin
                                nt considers the practical difficulty for                     ng the
      fair
      f value measurement used by an investment entity assoc                      y be noted th
                                                                      ciate. It may           hat as
      p IAS 28, a joint vent
      per                                    a
                                ture is also accounted   n equity me
                                                        on            ethod. Thus, similar pracctical
      d
      difficulties w be faced
                   will        d by a ventur rer in unwinding the fairr value meas surement useed by
      the
      t joint vent  ture. Therefo
                               fore, IASB may
                                            m consider  r to have a un            ciple of prov
                                                                       niform princ           viding
      r
      relief       u
             from unwinding    of
                               o fair value  e measureme ent to invest tments that are accounted as
      p equity method,
      per         m                                     v
                           such as associates and joint ventures.

 
 
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2016 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Integrated Software Solutions Integrated Software Development Integrated Software Services Integrated Software Solutions India Integrated Softw

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions