Latest Expert Exchange Queries
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
 
 
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Service Tax | Sales Tax | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Indirect Tax | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing
 
 
 
 
Popular Search: due date for vat payment :: VAT RATES :: empanelment :: TDS :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: cpt :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: VAT Audit :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: form 3cd
 
 
General »
  Withdrawal of Legal Tender Character of the existing Bank Notes in the denominations of ₹ 500/- and ₹ 1000/- (Updated as on November 30, 2016)
 Cases for tax scrutiny will be selected by machines
 Time to revisit 1997 direct tax rates, says P Chidambaram
 Lok Sabha passes Bill to tax black money deposits post demonetisation
 Last day to pay property tax with old notes
 Income tax department asks IDS declarants to pay tax by 30 November
 Why PM Narendra Modi must beware of the breathtaking Arthakranti tax
 Japanese firms seek easing of restrictions on funding in India
 Tax on black money: How the cookie will crumble
 Income tax officials say raids on jewellers based on 'credible intelligence' proving fruitful
 Exchange window being misused, government forced to reduce limit to Rs 2000, says Arun Jaitley

Interest on tax refunds haunts government
September, 03rd 2013

Delayed direct tax refunds and the high interest outgo are proving to be a headache for the government.

Even as thousands await refunds for the 2011-12 fiscal, the Public Accounts Committee (PAC) of Parliament has called revenue secretary Sumit Bose and attorney general G E Vahanvati for what it believes are "mutually contradictory opinions" by the chief law officer on the expenditure that the government incurred in paying interest on tax refunds. Although the issue dates back to 2011-12 , the amount involved in payment of refunds adds up to over Rs 34,000 crore in the last five financial years.

What the PAC is concerned with is the Comptroller & Auditor General's (CAG) observation that the payments were in breach of Article 114(3) of the Constitution as the government did not provide for them in the Budget and were therefore, not cleared by Parliament as other spending proposals.

The CAG has maintained that just like interest payments , which are budgeted for by the finance ministry, even interest paid on delayed refunds should be provided for. In fact, CAG has pointed out that the finance ministry had provided Rs 92 crore as "interest for refund of excess tax" in the 2001-02 but the practice was discontinued and is now treated as an outgo from the gross tax receipts.

The finance ministry has told the PAC that separate accounting of interest on refunds will lead to "very serious difficulties as correct estimation will not be possible". When the committee sought the law ministry's view, in September 2012, Vahanvati responded by saying, "The objection taken by CAG with regard to the practice followed in relation to payment of interest on refunds of excess tax is completely justified. The proper procedure would be clearly to indicate the tax collection as a receipt and estimate the interest payable on refund of taxes as an expenditure. I agree with the view of CAG that the reason given with regard to administrative difficulties is not tenable."

In May this year, however, he decided to "reconsider" his earlier opinion and said interest on refund of excess tax "is not an expenditure and such outgo cannot be considered with other operational expenses", resulting in summons from the PAC for what it believes are "mutually contradictory opinions".

Sources in the government , however, said the "reconsidered" opinion was the result of a fresh reference by the law ministry and the emergence of more facts, legal provisions and notes. In the May 2013 opinion, the attorney general has cited various provisions of the Constitution and also referred to the Income Tax Act that creates a legal entitlement in favour of a taxpayer. He then referred to the General Financial Rules where it mentioned that "refund of revenues are not regarded as expenditure for purposes of grants or appropriation".

 
 
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2016 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Binarysoft Technologies - Our Portfolio

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions