Latest Expert Exchange Queries

GST Demo Service software link:
Username: demouser Password: demopass
Get your inventory and invoicing software GST Ready from Binarysoft
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing | GST - Goods and Services Tax
Popular Search: due date for vat payment :: cpt :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: VAT Audit :: form 3cd :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: VAT RATES :: TDS :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: empanelment :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT
From the Courts »
 M/S Abhipra Capital Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax (Investigation)
 Rashtriya Chemicals & Fertilizers Limited vs. CIT (ITAT Mumbai)
  Abicor and Binzel Technoweld Pvt. Ltd vs. UOI (Bombay High Court)
 Abicor and Binzel Technoweld Pvt. Ltd vs. UOI (Bombay High Court)
 CST vs. Shri Krishna Chaitanya Enterprises (Bombay High Court)
 Industrial Infrastructure Development Corporation (Gwalior) M.P. Ltd vs. CIT (Supreme Court)
 Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-7 Vs. Pavitra Commercial Ltd.
 Commissioner Of Income Tax Delhi Iv Vs. Gee Kay Finance & Leasing Co. Ltd.
 Pr.Commissioner Of Income Tax-6 Vs. Nokia Solutions & Network India Pvt Ltd (Formerly Known As, Nokia Siemens Network Pvt Ltd)
 SKY Light Hospitality Llp Vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle -28(1), New Delhi
 Tax outgo may rise for investors in companies undergoing M&A cases

Aloke Anand Vs. Income-tax Officer, C/0 Bhatia & Bhatia, CAs Ward 27(2), New Delhi. 12, Central Land, Bengali Market,New Delhi-110001.
September, 24th 2013
                  DELHI BENCH "C" NEW DELHI

                         ITA Nos. 1547 & 1548/Del/2013
                         Asstt. Yr: 2006-07
Aloke Anand                           Vs.      Income-tax Officer,
C/0 Bhatia & Bhatia, CAs                       Ward 27(2), New Delhi.
12, Central Land, Bengali Market,
New Delhi-110001.


( Appellant )                                      ( Respondent )

                Appellant by :    Shri Rajan Bhatia CA
                Respondent by :   Shri Sameer Sharma Sr. DR



      These are two assessee's appeals ­ one against quantum and the
other against the penalty imposed u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961
relating to A.Y. 2006-07.

2.    In quantum appeal, the assessee has challenged the confirmation of
addition made on account of investment of Rs. 2,00,000/- in HDFC Mutual
fund as income from undisclosed sources.

3.    Brief facts are: The assessee is claimed to be regularly assessed to tax
and return of income was filed. The assessment resulted in ex parte as the
assessee did not receive proper notices. The assessing officer found that the
assessee had made investment of Rs. 2 lacs in HDFC Mutual Funds. As the
                                            2                     ITA 1547 & 1548/Del/2013
                                                                         2006-07 & 2007-08

assessment was ex parte, the above amount was added u/s 68. Aggrieved,
assessee preferred first appeal, where additional evidence was filed
explaining that the investment in HDFC Mutual Fund was made out of
withdrawal from Indian Overseas Bank (IOB). According to assessee, it had
explained the source of deposit in IOB being the sale of other mutual funds.
CIT(A) erroneously held that assessee could not explain the source of
deposit in IOB as the CIT(A) wanted to explain the source of the source and
accordingly the addition was confirmed. Aggrieved, assessee is before us.

4.          Ld. Counsel for the assessee drew our attention to written
submissions. In the written submissions filed before CIT(A) all these facts
were disclosed. However, CIT(A) has not appreciated the same. Ld. Counsel
makes categorical statement as under:
     (i)       The assessee invested Rs. 2,00,000/- in HDFC Mutual Funds by
               way of a cheque issued on Indian Overseas Bank, Jaipur.
     (ii)      The balance in Indian Overseas Bank Jaipur account comprised of
               sale of other mutual funds held by the assessee. These facts can be
               proved by the assessee by documentary evidence.
     (iii)     The statement is correct and if the same is found to be otherwise
               the assessing officer while framing the set aside assessment can
               take a suitable note of it and can take appropriate action in penalty
               proceedings which may arise in case assessee's statement is found
               to be incorrect.
     (iv)      It is pleaded that the matter may be set aside, restored back to the
               file of assessing officer where assessee undertakes to produce the
               relevant evidence.
5.          Ld. DR is heard.
                                        3                     ITA 1547 & 1548/Del/2013
                                                                     2006-07 & 2007-08

6.     We have heard rival contentions and gone through the entire material
available on record. The assessee emphatically claims that he has not earned
any income which has escaped assessment but the amount has been
reinvested by realization of existing mutual funds. In the interest of
substantial interest, we are inclined to set aside the matter back to the file of
assessing officer to decide the issue afresh, keeping in view the undertaken
given by the assessee's counsel as mentioned above.

6.1.   Since we have set aside the quantum to the file of assessing officer,
consequently the corresponding penalty u/s 271(1)(c) imposed at Rs.
48,160/- is also set aside, which may be considered while reframing the

7.     In the result, both the appeals are allowed for statistical purposes only.

Order pronounced in open court on 16-09-2013.

             Sd/-                                     Sd/-
( T.S. KAPOOR )                                ( R.P. TOLANI )
ACCOUNTANT MEMBER                              JUDICIAL MEMBER
Dated: 16th Sept. 2013.
Copy to :
   1. Assessee
   2. AO
   3. CIT
   4. CIT(A)
   5. DR
4   ITA 1547 & 1548/Del/2013
           2006-07 & 2007-08
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2018 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Binarysoft Technologies - We Bring IT. Offshore software outsourcing company. We use Global Delivery Model (GDM) and believe in Follow The Sun principle

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions