IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI `C' BENCH
          BEFORE SHRI A.N. PAHUJA, AM & SHRI C.M.GARG, JM
                       ITA nos.1468 to 1471/Del/2012
                   AYs:2002-03 & 2006-07 to 2008-09

Shri Harish Bhasin,             V/s .  ACIT,Central Circle-13,
T-1, Rajouri Garden,New                New Delhi
Delhi
                       [PAN : AALPB2977Q]


(Appellant)                                        (Respondent)

              Assessee by           None
              Revenue by            Shri Satpal Singh,DR


                Date of hearing                   10-09-2012
                Date of pronouncement             10-09-2012







                                   ORDER



 Per Bench:- These four appeals filed on 29.3.2012 by the assessee against
four separate orders dated 27-12-2011 for the AY 2002-03; dated 14.12.2011for
the AYs 2006-07 & 2007-08 & dated 15.12.2001 for the AY 2008-09 of the ld.
CIT(A)-I, New Delhi, raise a number of grounds relating to upholding of additions
on account of gifts, deposits in bank, remuneration to directors, commission etc.
.Assessments for the AYs 2006-07 to 2008-09 were completed u/s 144 of the
Income-tax Act,1961[hereinafter referred to as the `Act'] while appeals for these
assessment years were disposed of exparte, none having appeared before the
ld. CIT(A). Even before us, none appeared on behalf of the assessee when these
appeals were called for hearing nor any request for adjournment was filed .
Earlier, the ld. AR on behalf of the assessee was informed on 31.5.2012 itself
that the hearing of the appeal is fixed for today. It, therefore, appears that the
assessee is not interested in pursuing these appeals. In these circumstances,
following the decision of the Delhi Bench of the Tribunal in the case of Multiplan
                                      2            I.T.A. nos1468to 1471/Del./2012







(India) Pvt. Ltd. Vs CIT [38 ITD 320] (Del) and the decision of the Hon'ble
Madhya Pradesh High Court in the case of Estate of Late Tukojirao Holkar Vs
CWT [(1996) 223 ITR 480 (MP)], these appeals filed by the assessee are
dismissed in limine.

                  Order pronounced in open Court

          Sd/-                                                   Sd/-
    (C.M.GARG)                                            (A.N. PAHUJA)
 (Judicial Member)                                     (Accountant Member)
Copy of the Order forwarded to:-
      1. Assessee.
      2. ACIT, Central Circle-13, New Delhi
      3. CIT concerned.
      4. CIT(A)-I, New Delhi
      5. DR, ITAT,'C' Bench, New Delhi
      6. Guard File.
                                                                    BY ORDER,
                                                           Deputy/Asstt.Registrar
                                                                     ITAT, Delhi