Latest Expert Exchange Queries

GST Demo Service software link: https://ims.go2customer.com
Username: demouser Password: demopass
Get your inventory and invoicing software GST Ready from Binarysoft info@binarysoft.com
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
 
 
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing | GST - Goods and Services Tax
 
 
 
 
Popular Search: due date for vat payment :: TDS :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: VAT Audit :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: VAT RATES :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: form 3cd :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: cpt :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: empanelment :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD
 
 
From the Courts »
 CIT vs. ITD CEM India JV (Bombay High Court)
 Rajasthan Tax Consultants Association vs. UOI (Rajasthan High Court)
  H.T. MEDIA LIMITED Vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-IV, NEW DELHI
 Commissioner Of Income Tax (Ltu), New Delhi Vs. Oriental Insurance Company Ltd.
 Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central)-2 Vs. Index Securities Private Limited
 Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Ahmedabad Benches, Ahmedabad Constitution For The Period From 18/09/2017 To 22/09/2017
  M/s Brothers & Sisters Enterprise vs. JCIT (ITAT Kolkata)
  Commissioner Of Income Tax, Delhi-Iv Vs. DLF Universal Ltd.
 Commissioner Of Income Tax, Delhi-Iv Vs. DLF Universal Ltd.
 Jcb India Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax &
 Saheb Ram Om Prakash Marketing Pvt Ltd Vs. Commissioner Of Income Tax & ORS

M/s. Supreme Synthetics Mills Pvt. Ltd.,76/78, 1st Floor, Dadyseth Agiary Lane, Kalbadevi Road, Mumbai-400 002 Vs. The ITO, Ward-4(3)(4),
September, 13th 2012
                 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
                        MUMBAI BENCH `E' MUMBAI

        BEFORE SHRI D.K. AGARWAL, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND
            SHRI N.K. BILLAIYA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

                           ITA No.3476/Mum/2011
                           Assessment Year-2001-02

 M/s. Supreme Synthetics Mills Pvt.              The ITO, Ward-4(3)(4),
Ltd.,                                            Mumbai
76/78, 1st Floor,
Dadyseth Agiary Lane,                      Vs.
Kalbadevi Road,
Mumbai-400 002

PAN-AAACS 6401L

             (Appellant)                                 (Respondent)

                             Appellant by: None
                            Respondent by: Shri Krishnmoorthy

Date of Hearing :11.09.2012
Date of pronouncement:11.9.2012




                                 ORDER

PER N.K. BILLAIYA, AM:


      The assessee has filed this appeal for assessment year 2001-02 against
the order of Ld. CIT(A)-8 dt. 22.2.2011.


2.    The notice was given to assessee fixing the date of hearing on
11.09.2012 through notice board.      But no one appeared on behalf of the
assessee. Nor there is any application for adjournment. In view of above, it
appears that assessee is not interested in prosecuting this appeal.       Hence
this appeal of the assessee is liable to be dismissed for non-prosecution. In
this regard, we are supported by the decision in the case of CIT Vs B.N.
Bhattachargee and another, reported in 118 ITR 460 (relevant pages 477 &
478) wherein their Lordships have held that:
                                       2                          ITA No.3476/M/2011




      "The appeal does not mean merely filing of the appeal but effectively
      pursuing it."

4.    In this regard we are also supported by the decision in the case of CIT
Vs. Multiplan India (P) Ltd. 38 ITD 320 (Del).


5.    In view of the above and also considering the provisions of Rule 19 of
the Appellate Tribunal Rules, 1963, appeal of the assessee is dismissed.





6.    In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed for non-prosecution.


      Order pronounced in the Open Court at the time of hearing i.e. on 11th
September, 2012.



           Sd/-                                         Sd/-
     (D.K. AGARWAL)                               (N.K. BILLAIYA )
      Judicial Member                            Accountant Member

Mumbai, Dated 11th September, 2012
Rj

Copy to :
1. The Appellant
2. The Respondent
3. The CIT-concerned
4. The CIT(A)-concerned
5. The DR `E' Bench
True Copy

                                                       By Order

                                           Asstt. Registrar, I.T.A.T, Mumbai
 
 
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2017 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Binarysoft Technologies - We Bring IT. Offshore software outsourcing company. We use Global Delivery Model (GDM) and believe in Follow The Sun principle

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions