Latest Expert Exchange Queries
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
 
 
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Service Tax | Sales Tax | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Indirect Tax | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing
 
 
 
 
Popular Search: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: TDS :: form 3cd :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: VAT Audit :: due date for vat payment :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: empanelment :: cpt :: VAT RATES
 
 
From the Courts »
  Micro Spacematrix Solution P Ltd vs. ITO (ITAT Delhi)
 Micro Spacematrix Solution P Ltd vs. ITO (ITAT Delhi)
 CIT vs. Greenfield Hotels & Estates Pvt. Ltd (Bombay High Court)
 IndiaBulls Financial Services Ltd vs. DCIT (Delhi High Court)
 Maharao Bhim Singh of Kota vs. CIT (Supreme Court)
 Ravneet Takhar Vs. Commissioner Of Income Tax Ix And Ors.
 Jaiprakash Associates Ltd. Vs. Commissioner Of Income Tax
 Formula One World Championship Limited Vs. Commissioner Of Income Tax, International Taxation-3 And Anr.
 Commissioner Of Income Tax International Taxation-3 Delhi Vs. Formula One World Championship Ltd. And Anr.
 Reliance Communications Ltd vs. DDIT (ITAT Mumbai)
  Sushila Devi vs. CIT (Delhi High Court)

M/s. Jalaram Petrochem B-161,Chinar,R.A. Kidwai Road, Wadala,Mumbai-400 031 VS. Income Tax Officer-17(2)(1),Piramal Chamber, Parel,Mumbai-400 012
September, 26th 2012
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH "........", MUMBAI

   BEFORE SHRI RAJENDRA SINGH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND
           SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO, JUDICIAL MEMBER

                     ITA No. 8170/Mum/2010
                         Assessment Year :

M/s. Jalaram Petrochem                Income Tax Officer-17(2)(1),
B-161, Chinar,                        Piramal Chamber, Parel,
R.A. Kidwai Road, Wadala,             Mumbai-400 012
Mumbai-400 031                  Vs.

PAN NO: AAAFJ 2863 L
        (Appellant)                           (Respondent)


                Appellant by     :    None
               Respondent by     :    Shri K.G. Kutty

        Date of hearing       :        24.9.2012
        Date of Pronouncement :        24.9.2012





                             ORDER


PER RAJENDRA SINGH, AM:

     This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order dated

8.9.2010 of CIT(A) for the assessment year 1997-98. The only dispute

in this appeal is regarding levy of penalty under section 271(1)(c) of

the Income tax Act. However, no one appeared to represent the case

on behalf of the assessee when the appeal came up for hearing today

(24.9.2012) though notice of hearing had been given well in advance.

Neither someone appeared on behalf of the assessee nor any

adjournment application has been received. It can, therefore, be
                                      2                            ITA No.8170/M/12
                                                                   A.Y.97-98


reasonably   concluded   that   the       assessee   is   not   interested       in

prosecuting the appeal. The appeal does not mean only filing of

memorandum of appeal but also pursuing it effectively as held by

Hon'ble Supreme Court in case of B.N. Bhatacharjee and Anr. (118 ITR

461) (at pages 477/478).     In such cases where an appellant is not

interested in prosecution of appeal Court/Tribunal              have inherent

power to dismiss the proceedings for non-prosecution as held by

Hon'ble High Court of Mumbai in case of M/s. Chemipol vs. Union of

India in Excise Appeal No.62/2009. On the facts of this case we are

convinced that the assessee is not interested in pursuing the appeal.

We, therefore, dismiss the appeal of the assessee as unadmitted.





2.   In the result, appeal of the assessee stands dismissed.



Order pronounced in the open court on 24.9.2012.


      Sd/-                                      Sd/-
(VIJAY PAL RAO )                          (RAJENDRA SINGH)
JUDICIAL MEMBER                           ACCOUNTANT MEMBER



Mumbai, Dated: 24.9. 2012.
Jv.
                                3                          ITA No.8170/M/12
                                                           A.Y.97-98




Copy to: The Appellant
         The Respondent
         The CIT, Concerned, Mumbai
         The CIT(A) Concerned, Mumbai
         The DR " " Bench

True Copy
                                         By Order

                      Dy/Asstt. Registrar, ITAT, Mumbai.
 
 
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2016 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
SEO Company Search Engine Optimization Company US SEO Local SEO Company Website SEO Company Alabama SEO Company Alaska SEO Company Arizona SEO Company Arkansas SEO Company California SEO Company Colorado SEO Company Connecticut SEO Company Delawa

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions