Latest Expert Exchange Queries

GST Demo Service software link: https://ims.go2customer.com
Username: demouser Password: demopass
Get your inventory and invoicing software GST Ready from Binarysoft info@binarysoft.com
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
 
 
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing | GST - Goods and Services Tax
 
 
 
 
Popular Search: empanelment :: form 3cd :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: VAT RATES :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: due date for vat payment :: VAT Audit :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: TDS :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: cpt
 
 
From the Courts »
 Bhushan Steel vs. CIT (Supreme Court)
 CIT vs. Chaphalkar Brothers Pune (Supreme Court)
 Income Tax Appellate Tribunal : Kolkata Benches : Kolkata. Sub : Cause List For The Cases Fixed On Friday The 15/12/2017
 Commissioner Of Income Tax, Delhi Vs. Maruti Suzuki India Ltd.
 Sunbeam Auto Private Limited Vs. Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax
 Sc Johnson Products Private Limited Vs. Additional Commissioner Of Income Tax, Special Range-8, New Delhi
  Amira Pure Foods Pvt. Ltd vs. Pr CIT (ITAT Delhi)
 Stovekraft India vs. CIT (Himachal Pradesh High Court)
 CIT vs. Goodwill Theatres Pvt Ltd (Supreme Court)
 DCIT vs. Ace Multi Axes Systems Ltd (Supreme Court)
 Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax Vs. B. C. Management Services Pvt. Ltd.

Mrs. Regina Jayprakash 78/2312, Kinara CHS Ltd. Pant Nagar, Ghatkopar (E) Mumbai 400075 Vs. Income Tax Officer - 22(2)-4 Mumbai
September, 24th 2012
               IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
                          "D" Bench, Mumbai

                Before Shri D. Manmohan, Vice President
              and Shri Rajendra Singh, Accountant Member

                          MA No. 248/Mum/2012
                  (Arising out of ITA No. 3121/Mum/2011)
                         (Assessment Year: 2007-08)

      Mrs. Regina Jayprakash             Income Tax Officer - 22(2)-4
      78/2312, Kinara CHS Ltd.       Vs. Mumbai
      Pant Nagar, Ghatkopar (E)
      Mumbai 400075
      PAN - ADLPR 4425 Q
              Applicant                            Respondent

                   Applicant by:      Shri Ajay R. Singh
                   Respondent by:     Shri Amardeep

                   Date of Hearing:       21.09.2012
                   Date of Pronouncement: 21.09.2012




                                  ORDER

Per D. Manmohan, V.P.

     By this application the assessee seeks recall of the order dated
15.02.2012 for the reasons stated in the petition as well as in the affidavit of
the assessee. Admittedly the appeal was disposed of exparte, qua assessee,
since the assessee did not appear on the date of hearing.

2.    The learned counsel submitted that the case was originally fixed for
hearing on 15.02.2012 by mentioning the date of hearing in the
acknowledgement-cum-notice issued on 20.04.2011. Due to long lapse of
time the factum of posting of the appeal missed the attention of the assessee
and hence, despite the fact that assessee was interested in pursuing the
matter, none appeared on the date of hearing due to a genuine lapse on the
part of the assessee. It was therefore contended that in exercise of the
powers vested in us under Rule 24 of the Appellate Tribunal Rules, 1963 the
Tribunal may recall the order in the interests of substantial justice and give
the assessee a proper opportunity of being heard.

3.    We have also heard the learned D.R. and perused the record.
                                          2                   MA No. 248/Mum/2012
                                                              Mrs. Regina Jayprakash

4.        Having regard to the circumstances of the case we hereby recall our
order dated 15.02.2012 under Rule 24 of the Appellate Tribunal Rules and
direct the Registry to post the appeal for final hearing on 06.12.2012. Since
the date is announced in the open court, issuance of notice to the parties is
dispensed with.




5.        In the result, the miscellaneous application is allowed.

Order pronounced in the open court on 21st September 2012.

                   Sd/-                                     Sd/-
             (Rajendra Singh)                          (D. Manmohan)
            Accountant Member                          Vice President

Mumbai, Dated: 21st September 2012

Copy to:

     1.   The   Appellant
     2.   The   Respondent
     3.   The   CIT(A) ­ 33, Mumbai
     4.   The   CIT­ 22, Mumbai City
     5.   The   DR, "D" Bench, ITAT, Mumbai
                                                         By Order

//True Copy//
                                                      Assistant Registrar
                                              ITAT, Mumbai Benches, Mumbai
n.p.
 
 
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2017 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Customer relationship management software CRM software Operational CRM Collaborative CRM

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions