Latest Expert Exchange Queries
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
 
 
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Service Tax | Sales Tax | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Indirect Tax | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing
 
 
 
 
Popular Search: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: form 3cd :: due date for vat payment :: cpt :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: VAT RATES :: empanelment :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: VAT Audit :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: TDS
 
 
« General »
 Tax Department To Launch 2nd Phase Of Bank Accounts' Scrutiny Next Month
 How to claim tax benefit on tuition fees under Section 80C
 Online Income Tax grievance redressal facility launched at 60 offices
 Demonetisation impact on government tax revenue marginal; direct tax personal income grew at above budget estimates
 ICAI seeks more accountability, transparency in defence sector
 Will Budget help double farmers’ income?
 Verify online deposits made post demonetisation, income tax department asks taxpayers
 Union Budget 2017: Best budget is do not change anything, do no harm, implement well
 Why salaried class deserves standard deduction
 3 new taxes that Modi government could introduce, but won't
 Tax gains may showcase demonetisation windfall

International Business Machines Corp v Comm of Taxation (Federal Court of Australia)
September, 26th 2011

Software License income is assessable as Royalty

International Business Machines Corporation & IBM World Trade Corporation (IBM), both US companies, entered into a Software License Agreement with IBM Australia, an Australian company, under which they granted the latter the non-exclusive rights (i) to license and distribute copies of IBM Programs for their ultimate use by customers, (ii) to use such IBM Programs in revenue producing activities, (iii) to use such IBM Programs internally, (iv) to make or have made copies for the purposes described above, for distribution to affiliated companies etc. In consideration, IBM Australia agreed to pay IBM a fee of 40% of the revenue billed for each copy of an IBM programme distributed to a third party. IBM Australia initially withheld tax on the payments on the basis that it constituted royalty under Article 12(4) of the Australia-USA DTAA though it later sought a refund on the basis that the whole payment was not royalty which was rejected by the Department. IBM filed an application for a declaration that the whole of the amounts received was not assessable as royalty. HELD dismissing the application:

(i) Under Article 12(4) of the Treaty, royalty is defined to mean consideration forthe right to use any copyright, patent, design or model, plan, secret formula or process, trademark or other like property or right (Article 12(4)(a)(i)) or . the supply of technical or commercial knowledge or information or for the supply of any assistance of an ancillary and subsidiary nature to enable the application of the rights referred to in Article 12(4)(a)(i) or the knowledge/information referred to in Article 12(4)(b)(i) (Article 12(4)(b)(ii));

(ii) On facts, the argument that the SLA is in essence a distributorship agreement for the marketing of IBM computer programs and that the IP licenses granted to IBMA is only to enable it to carry on the function of a distributor is not acceptable. The SLA is not a distribution agreement which confers distribution rights independently of the grant of IP rights. There is no reference in the SLA to the payments being for the exercise of general distributorship rights. Rather, the payments are described as being for the acquisition of the stated IP rights. The detail of the SLA concerns the definition of IP and IP rights. There is no such detail with respect to distribution rights. The rights/content granted by the SLA are, in each case, rights/content of a kind contemplated by Article 12(4) and so the whole of the consideration is assessable as royalty.

 
 
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2017 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
SEO Company Search Engine Optimization Company US SEO Local SEO Company Website SEO Company Alabama SEO Company Alaska SEO Company Arizona SEO Company Arkansas SEO Company California SEO Company Colorado SEO Company Connecticut SEO Company Delawa

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions