Latest Expert Exchange Queries
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
 
 
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Service Tax | Sales Tax | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Indirect Tax | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing
 
 
 
 
Popular Search: TDS :: VAT Audit :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: empanelment :: due date for vat payment :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: VAT RATES :: cpt :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: form 3cd :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: list of goods taxed at 4%
 
 
News Headlines »
 GST Council fails to break deadlock over indirect tax regime, next meet on Dec 11 and 12 to hammer out differences
 Invoking Writ Jurisdiction For Income Tax Matters
 How to file income-tax returns online
 How Income Tax Returns Are Scrutinised
 All About New Income Disclosure Scheme to make Demonetisation successful
 Your deposit may draw income tax notice
 Accepting payment under IDS 2016
 New disclosure scheme could see 50% tax and 4-year limit on cash use for unaccounted deposits
 Pay 50% tax on unaccounted deposits, or 85% if caught, says Modi government
 Deadline to pay property tax in old currency extended
 Cabinet clears amendments to Income Tax Act

Sony tax litigation outcome: The case & its effects
September, 26th 2008

The landmark Sony judgment from the Bombay High Court offers clarity on permanent establishment taxation - but will the battle now shift to the transfer pricing arena. We examine the case and its consequences.

Recently foreign companies in India had cause for much cheer. A judgment by the Mumbai High Court in favour on Sony Entertainment Television said that as long as appropriate arms length remuneration has been paid to the Indian permanent establishment, no further profits can be attributed to this Indian entity and nothing else is liable to tax.

This judgement reinforces an earlier Supreme Court judgment in the case of Morgan Stanley BPO and brings some much needed clarity on the permanent establishment front But does this open up other avenues for tax litigation?

Here are some tax experts thinking aloud on this case and its consequences.

Uday Ved, Head -Tax & Regulatory Services, KPMG says, It has clearly relied on Morgan Stanley but saying that once there is an arms length remuneration given to the Indian entity there is no further tax and interesting there was a very old circular of CBDT, circular 23 of 1969 where CBDT has examined the issue if there was an agent in India, compensated on arms length basis, was there any further liability? CBDT held through the circular that it extinguishes further tax liability. That was always law of the land.

Mukesh Butani, Managing Partner, BMR & Company says, I think the most important question that will arise for the SC, should the revenue decide to appeal, would be, are you supposed to take into consideration the new OECD model convention, and Indias affirmation of those aspects, or are you supposed to deliver the judgment based on the current interpretation of the law based on the board circular. My view is that the latter is more likely that the former. But its too soon to say anything at this point in time.

Pranav Sayta, Partner, E&Y says, Its a circular which has been in force since 1969 at a time when there were not so many international transactions especially in the service space. The OECD interpretation on taxation was probably not available. So I am not too sure given all the background, whether there will be some amount of thinking as to whether that circular will hold true today.

Ajay Gupta, Head- Tax Practice, FoxMandal Consulting says, Arms length price principle has not been established and tax department can go to on say that arms length pricing is not according to justifications given by foreign entity. So that grey area still remains after the judgment.

M Lakshminarayanan, National Director- Tax, Deloitte says, Wherever there is arms length price determined by the entities under the transfer price regulations, they will review that arms length price and try to see whether they can get additional mileage by saying this is not arms length, and the extra would be brought to tax.

Sayta says, The revenue authorities below as of now would be far more considerate in their orders given the interpretation thats been taken. If the judgment is overturned by the Supreme Court then it would be different. But until that happens this means far more relief for foreign companies.

 
 
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2016 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Custom Software Development Outsourcing Custom Software Development Offshore Cus

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions