Latest Expert Exchange Queries

GST Demo Service software link: https://ims.go2customer.com
Username: demouser Password: demopass
Get your inventory and invoicing software GST Ready from Binarysoft info@binarysoft.com
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
 
 
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing | GST - Goods and Services Tax
 
 
 
 
Popular Search: form 3cd :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: TDS :: due date for vat payment :: VAT Audit :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: cpt :: VAT RATES :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: empanelment
 
 
ę News Headlines »
 I-T Department may go into overdrive this quarter
 Ways to reduce the TDS deduction from your salary
 4 Tips for choosing who prepares your 2017 Tax Returns
 Processing of income-tax returns under section 143(1) of the Income-tax Act which were filed in Forms ITR-1 to 6 & applicability of section 143(1)(a)(vi)
 Price Waterhouse gets 2-year ban in Satyam case
 How to save income tax under section 80C
 These four expenditures can help you save tax under section 80C
 How to avoid excess deduction of TDS from salary income
 Income-tax deduction from salaries during the financial year 2017-18 under section 192 of the Income-tax Act, 1961
 Comparison of 10 tax-saving investments under Section 80C
 10 Income Tax-Saving Options Beyond Section 80C Limit

SC rejects Foster's special leave plea against AAR order
September, 12th 2008

The Supreme Court has declined to entertain a Special Leave Petition by beer major Fosters Australia. The company was seeking to challenge an Authority for Advance Rulings (AAR) order that made it liable to pay tax in India after sale of Fosters Indias intellectual property rights, brand and trademark to UKs SABMiller.

The apex court asked Fosters Australia why it did not move the high court before filing the SLP.

Fosters India was the Indian unit of the Australian beer major. The latter had independently valued these intangible assets such as brand, trademark, goodwill and its licence to Fosters India to brew the brand, at about $90,000. Fosters Australia sold the Indian unit to global beer major SABMiller in 2006 for $120 million.

Following the apex courts directive declining the companys SLP, Fosters Australia sought permission to withdraw the petition which was then granted by SC. While allowing the withdrawal of SLP, the apex court asked the I-T department to suspend the assessment proceedings for two weeks to allow the party to move the HC.

Fosters Australia had raised the following issues before the AAR: whether sale of brand, trademark and brewing licence of Fosters India to SABMiller is liable to be taxed in India or not.

AAR said tax had to be paid in India on the income from the transfer of its right, title and Fosters brand under the Indian Income Tax Act. However, licence given by the Australian company to its Indian arm for brewing Fosters beer is not taxable in India.

The AAR ruling was a shot in the arm for the Indian tax authorities who wanted to tax all recent cross-border acquisitions of Indian companies by foreign parties, including Vodafones $11-billion takeover of Indian telecom major Hutch-Essar.

AARs reasoning for holding these intangible assets taxable is: The situs of Fosters India brand, trademark and goodwill had been associated with the companys Indian business, and therefore, the sale of these assets to SABMiller was liable to be taxed in India under the provisions of the Income Tax Act. Section 9(1) of the Income Tax Act provides for taxing income generated in India.

AAR did not accept the Australian company's argument that unlike other capital assets which can be geographically located, the situs of these intangible assets, like brand and trademark, have no particular geographical location, and therefore, no situs apart from the domicile of the owner.

AAR ruled the trademark and brand together with the goodwill they generated were assets situated in India when the transfer of ownership took place in 2006.

"It would be interesting to note that if the high court admits writ petition under Article 226, the disgruntled party may knock at the doors of the Supreme Court under Article 136 for redressel. It would be at the discretion of the apex court whether or not to entertain such application," said Daksha Baxi and Sanjay Sanghvi of Khaitan & Co.

They said such long-drawn exercise would result in more delays and the concept of Advance Ruling was brought in only to eliminate delay on such matters.

 
 
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2018 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Publishing Management System PMS News Management System Publishing Management System Development Online News Management System for media company custom Publishing management system development Survey management system Market Res

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions