Latest Expert Exchange Queries
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
 
 
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Service Tax | Sales Tax | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Indirect Tax | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing
 
 
 
 
Popular Search: empanelment :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: due date for vat payment :: VAT Audit :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: TDS :: form 3cd :: VAT RATES :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: cpt
 
 
News Headlines »
 How to file income-tax returns online
 How Income Tax Returns Are Scrutinised
 All About New Income Disclosure Scheme to make Demonetisation successful
 Your deposit may draw income tax notice
 Accepting payment under IDS 2016
 New disclosure scheme could see 50% tax and 4-year limit on cash use for unaccounted deposits
 Pay 50% tax on unaccounted deposits, or 85% if caught, says Modi government
 Deadline to pay property tax in old currency extended
 Cabinet clears amendments to Income Tax Act
 Have you got interest on your income tax refund?
 New income tax rules to curb unaccounted cash

SC upholds Coke stand on taxing warehousing fee
September, 11th 2007
In a recent ruling on an appeal filed by Coca-Cola, the Supreme Court has reaffirmed one of the time-tested principles of Indian tax system: the same income cannot be taxed twice. The dispute was over whether a tax can be levied on Coca-Cola as well as a warehousing company on the warehouse service charges paid by Coca-Cola. The appeal was filed by Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverage Corporation a subsidiary of Coca-Cola.

The SC upheld the view that since the warehousing company had paid tax on the income it received from Coca-Cola, by way of warehousing charges, the I-T department cannot levy tax on Coca-Cola on the payment for the warehouse services. The SC said it would amount to taxing the same income twice.

Coca-Cola had an arrangement with Pradeep Oil Corporation (POC) for using the latters premises for warehousing. Coca-Cola had paid warehousing charges to POC, on which tax was deducted at the rate of 2%. However, the I-T department took a different view. It held that warehousing charges were in fact rent, hence tax should have been deducted at the rate of 20%.

The assessing officer (AO) also treated the company as an assessee in default for not deducting tax at the rate of 20%. The AO also levied interest on the amount which was not deducted.

The Income-Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), the second appellate body on tax matters, and the high court had upheld the I-T departments order. However, Coca-Cola filed a miscellaneous petition to point out that ITAT did not consider the fact that the warehousing company, POC, had already paid the tax on the same income. Since tax was already recovered, no further tax can be levied.

At this point ITAT recalled its own order and held that AO was right in holding Coca-Cola as an assessee in default, yet there could be no recovery of tax from the company because the income under question has been already taxed in the hands of POC. The I-T department agreed to this order and chose not to challenge ITATs reopening of the matter.

At this satge, the HC stepped in saying that the matter had reached finality when the appeal was dismissed by the HC and hence ITAT was wrong in reopening the case.

The SC held that the HC should not have interfered with the final order of ITAT. The SC ruled that no tax could be enforced after taxes were paid by POC on the income under question. However, as per tax laws, this does not apply on the interest payable. In this case, the company had already paid interest and there is no dispute that POC had paid the tax payable on the income. Therefore, the SC upheld the ITAT ruling on the issue.
 
 
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2016 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Application Management Solutions Application Management System Application Management Software System Application Management Development Application Management Software Development

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions