sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing | GST - Goods and Services Tax
Latest Expert Exchange
News Headlines »
 How to submit Form 15H, Form 15G to avoid TDS on interest income
 What is tax deducted at source (TDS)?
 Income Tax Return filing 2018: Here are some important tips for you
 Change in Examination Venue in Thane, Zone – II, May 2018 Examinations
 Here’s all you need to know New Income Tax return for salaried class available on IT portal
 What to do if you missed the (second) tax deadline
 Income-tax (5th Amendment) Rules, 2018 - Notification under section 9A (3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 in respect of Fund Manager Regime
 Income Tax department warns salaried class again filing wrong ITRs
 ITR-1 form for AY 18-19 now available for e-filing
 New Income Tax Return Form for Salaried Class available in Portal
 Income Tax Return: ITR-1 ready for e-filing, says I-T department

Taxing dividends of agricultural companies
September, 30th 2006
Complications arise when a company engaged in agricultural operations declares dividends -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Where the company's income is partly from agriculture and partly from manufacture, the profits on the sale will have to be apportioned and the element in the profits referable to the manufacturing process will be taxable as business profits. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Dividend taxation has undergone many changes in the past decade. To encourage equity investments, dividends were completely exempted from income-tax in the hands of the shareholders from 1997 onwards. Earlier, the exemption was limited to Rs 12,000. To safeguard the loss of revenue by the abolition of tax on dividends, Section 115-O was introduced in the Income-Tax Act, 1961 with effect from April 1,1997. The tax was levied on distributed profits of the companies on the amount of dividends they distributed. The idea was that the incidence of the levy should be on the company and not passed on to the shareholder. It is thus a tax on the company and not on the shareholder. The system has been working very well and shareholders have been reaping huge benefits by way of exemption from tax on the dividends. Agricultural companies However, complications arise when a company engaged in agricultural operations declares dividends. As we know, agricultural income is completely exempt from taxation. However, the exemption will not apply if the agricultural produce is subjected to a process which will render it fit to be taken to the market. Raw sugarcane or raw green tea leaf may be exempt but not when it is subjected to a process to make it fit for human consumption. Where the company's income is partly from agriculture and partly from manufacture, the profits on the sale will have to be apportioned and the element in the profits referable to the manufacturing process will be taxable as business profits. This is provided for in the Income-Tax Rules. Taxing plantations Tea plantations offer 40 per cent of their income for Central income-tax and the balance 60 per cent is exempt as agricultural income. When such companies distribute profits as dividends, even the 60 per cent agricultural income is distributed. The question arises, how will Section 115O operate on such dividends distributed by tea plantations? Even the vires of the Section was questioned. If the additional distribution tax on dividends is to be levied on the agricultural part of the profits, such levy will have to be struck down. The tax is levied on the company and not on the shareholder. It was argued before the Calcutta High Court that since the additional tax was only on part of the income, which relates to declaration of dividends, there could not be any mechanism providing for segregation of such income, as such distribution of profits would also include agricultural income. The Calcutta High Court rejected the argument. If a tea company has a net income of Rs 100, Rs 40 would be liable to income-tax at the prescribed rate and the assessee would be assessed accordingly. By virtue of Section 115-O if the company declares Rs 50 for distribution among the shareholders, it would have a proportionate liability. It is true that in case the company decides to distribute a part of the income, it would be impossible to find out whether that part included the whole of the agricultural income or a part of it. This exercise now is not relevant in view of Rule 8 of the Income-Tax Rules. In such an event the company would be charged on Rs 40 for income-tax and on Rs 50 for additional income-tax proportionately. The High Court also pointed out that the Rs 50 as a whole cannot be taxed at the prescribed rate of additional tax. Such additional tax would be levied on Rs 20 being 40 per cent of Rs 50. Hence, at the end of the day, the company would have to pay income-tax at the prescribed rate on Rs 40 as well as additional income-tax at the prescribed rate on Rs 20. The above judgment of the Calcutta High Court in Jayshree Tea and Industries Ltd. vs Union of India (285 ITR 506) is the first ruling on the interpretation of Section 115-O. This was an appeal by the company against a single judge order upholding the levy on the entire income of the company. The Division Bench modified the order on the lines indicated above and appears a reasonable interpretation of Section 115-O read in conjunction with Section 10(33) and Rule 8 of the Income-Tax Rules. It may be remembered that Rule 7 provides for apportionment of taxable income in the case of companies whose income is partially agricultural and partially non-agricultural. Rule 7A and Rule 7B were brought in by the I-T (Second Amendment) Rules 2001 with effect form April 1,2002 , that is, assessment year 2002-03 onwards. In respect of rubber plantations, 35 per cent of the income is subjected to Central income-tax under Rule 7A. Income from coffee grown and cured by the seller in India will suffer a Central income-tax of 25 per cent of the income. However, where the income is derived from sale of coffee grown, cured, roasted and grounded by the seller in India, 40 per cent of such income shall be deemed to be income liable to Central income-tax. In all these cases, Section 115-O will have to be applied on the dividends distributed out of the taxable income of the rubber or coffee companies on the lines indicated by the Calcutta High Court ruling. This is indeed a matter of substantial relief from the rigours of Section 115-O in the case of agricultural plantation companies. The additional dividend distribution tax will be far less than imagined hitherto. T. C. A. Ramanujam (The author is a former Chief Commissioner of Income-Tax.)
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2018 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Binarysoft Technologies - Careers

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions