sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing | GST - Goods and Services Tax
Latest Expert Exchange
« Service Tax »
 How to get registered under goods and services tax
 Service Tax can’t be Levied on Activity of Collection of VAT on behalf of Commercial Tax Dept
 Why you should worry about June 15 advance tax date
 Five reasons why you should start your investments in tax saving funds now
 Income Tax Department Releases All 7 ITR Forms Check Details About New IT Forms
 Income tax benefits for senior citizens: Here is all you need to know in brief
 12 ways to avoid paying more for bank services
 I-T return filing: Income Tax offices, Ayakar Seva Kendras to remain open from March 29-31
 Top 5 money matters you must settle before March 31 From income tax returns to LTCG,
 Steep fines for missing March 31 income tax deadline
 CBEC clears some air on refunds under GST, central excise, service tax laws

Statute doesnt envisage tax as a barrier to free movement of trade, commerce
August, 05th 2016

A day after the Parliament passed the Goods and Services Tax Bill, the Supreme Court on Thursday observed that the Indian Constitution does not envisage tax as a “barrier” to free movement of trade, commerce and intercourse.

“Once it operates as a barrier, it stops being a tax. It becomes an obstruction and offensive,” Chief Justice of India T.S. Thakur observed.

Debate between Bench, A-G

The observations came during a debate between a nine-judge Constitution Bench led by the Bench and Attorney-General Mukul Rohatgi on the constitutionality of the levy of varied entry tax by different States governments.

The debate was on the contours of Article 301 of the Constitution dealing with freedom, trade and commerce in the country.

‘Movement without restriction’

“It is this freedom of trade, commerce and intercourse which allows a trader to move from place to place within the country without obstruction. A trader moves constantly and so long as his fundamental right is protected under Article 19, there is no question of a fiscal restriction being an obstruction,” Chief Justice Thakur observed.

Mr. Rohatgi, dealing with Article 301, said a restriction on free intra-State trade should be “reasonable and in public interest.” He said special provisions relating to different States and grant of financial subsidies to them do not amount to discrimination if they are done for the upliftment of the particular State.

Difference in history, geography

“You cannot bring equality by eclipsing the fact that there is difference in the history, geography and development graph of States. People of Tamil Nadu have never faced the trials and tribulations of North and North-Eastern States,” Mr. Rohatgi argued.

“One-third of our country is infested by Naxalites running through the heart of our country... So we have to develop these States,” Mr. Rohatgi said. He justified the higher taxation regimes followed by some States in order to augment their efforts to build infrastructure.

States not subservient

“States are not subservient to the Centre under the Constitution... States are not appendages but supreme in their own right under the Constitution,” Mr. Rohatgi submitted.

The Bench is hearing on the validity of separate entry taxes on goods mandated by various State government statutes, without heeding to the plea of the Centre to wait for the passage of GST Bill in Parliament.

Mr. Rohatgi had at the very commencement of the case pleaded to the Bench that they should wait till the fate of the pending GST (Goods and Services Tax) Bill was known.

‘Complex tax issues involved’

The bench, also comprising Justices A.K. Sikri, S.A. Bobde, Shiva Kirti Singh, N.V. Ramana, R. Banumathi, A.M. Khanwilkar, D.Y. Chandrachud and Ashok Bhushan, decided to go ahead with the hearing, saying that “complex tax issues are involved.”

It said issues related to past levies by the States will be decided in the matter.

The Attorney-General submitted that some arrangement could be made in respect to past demands by the States relating to entry tax after GST Bill, involving a Constitution amendment, was passed by Parliament.

Entry tax is imposed by State governments on movement of goods from one State to another. It is levied by the State that receives goods.

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2018 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Binarysoft Technologies - Our Vision

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions