Latest Expert Exchange Queries
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Service Tax | Sales Tax | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Indirect Tax | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing
Popular Search: TDS :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: due date for vat payment :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: VAT Audit :: form 3cd :: VAT RATES :: empanelment :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: cpt :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes
« From the Courts »
 Group M. Media India Pvt. Ltd vs. UOI (Bombay High Court)
 Shreemati Devi vs. CIT (Allahabad High Court)
 Vatsala Shenoy vs. JCIT (Supreme Court)
  Dr. Gautam Sen vs. CCIT (Bombay High Court)
 Dr. Gautam Sen vs. CCIT (Bombay High Court)
 DCIT vs. Shivshankar R. Sharma (ITAT Mumbai)
 ACIT vs. Jawaharlal Agicha (ITAT Mumbai)
 CIT vs. M/s. D. Chetan & Co (Bombay High Court)
 Makes further amendments to Notification no. 157/90-Customs dated 28th March, 1990 regarding temporary admission under the ATA Carnet
 Appointment of Common Adjudicating Authority by DGRI - 2/2016-Customs
 ransfers Of Hon’ble Members Of The ITAT (September 2016)

Smt.Chhaya Jignesh Desai, B-501, Mahavir Darshan, I T Road, Opp Railway CrossingDahisar (E), Mumbai-400068 Vs. Income Tax Officer, 25(1)(1), Mumbai.
August, 05th 2015
               ,   "-  " 

             BEFORE S/SHRI B.R.BASKARAN (Accountant Member
                     .. ,                       
                   ./I.T.A. No1303/Mum/2014
                 (   / Assessment Year :2009-10)

 Smt.Chhaya Jignesh Desai,         / Income Tax Officer, 25(1)(1),
 B-501, Mahavir Darshan,               Mumbai.
 I T Road, Opp Railway Crossing-
 Dahisar (E),
       ( /Appellant)               ..    (    / Respondent)

           . /   . /PAN/GIR No. :AGBPD2830L

             / Appellant by              None
               /Rspondent by             Shri K P R R Murty

              / Date of Hearing
                                             : 4.8.2015
             /Date of Pronouncement : 4.8.2015

                                / O R D E R


        The assessee has filed this appeal challenging the order dated
23.12.2013 passed by the ld. CIT(A)-35, Mumbai and it relates to the
assessment year 2009-10.

2.      None appeared on behalf of the assessee even though the notice of
hearing was sent by Registered Post Acknowledgment on two occasions.
Hence, I proceed to dispose of the appeal ex-parte, without the presence
of assessee.
                                     2                  I T A N o . 1 3 0 3 / Mu m / 2 0 1 4

3.    I notice that the appeal is barred by limitation by five days. The
assessee has filed an affidavit with regard to the delay caused in filing the
appeal and the same reads as under:
      "I Smt. Chhaya J Desai an adult Indian Inhabitant to have to state
      and request learned Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Members to
      condone delay in filing the appeal in Form 36 under section 250 of
      the Income Tax Act, 1961 by 5 days.

      I Smt. Chhaya J Desai request to condone the delay and pardon late
      filing of appeal "

4.    I heard the ld. DR on this preliminary issue of limitation. The ld. DR
submitted that the assessee has not furnished any reason explaining the
delay and hence, the appeal should not be admitted.

5.    I find merit in the contention of the ld.DR. A perusal of the affidavit
filed by the assessee in support of delay would show that the assessee has
not given any reason for the delay. It is well settled proposition of law
that the assessee is required to explain the delay day by day till the date
of filing of appeal.   Since the affidavit filed by the assessee does not
mention any cogent reason for the delay occurred in filing the appeal, I am
constrained to dismiss the appeal in limine, as unadmitted.

6.    In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed
            Pronounced accordingly on 4th August 2015.
                 4th                         August, 2015    


                                         (..  / B.R. BASKARAN)
                                         / ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

  Mumbai: 4th
                   Aug, 2015.
                            3           I T A N o . 1 3 0 3 / Mu m / 2 0 1 4

. ../ SRL , Sr. PS

        /Copy of the Order forwarded to :
1.  / The Appellant
2.      / The Respondent.
3.     () / The CIT(A)- concerned
4.      / CIT concerned
5.      ,     ,                  /
     DR, ITAT, Mumbai concerned
6.     / Guard file.

                                             / BY ORDER,
True copy
                                       (Asstt. Registrar)
                                    ,  /ITAT, Mumbai
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2016 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Binarysoft Technologies - Our Team

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions