Latest Expert Exchange Queries
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
 
 
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Service Tax | Sales Tax | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Indirect Tax | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing
 
 
 
 
Popular Search: form 3cd :: VAT RATES :: due date for vat payment :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: cpt :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: empanelment :: TDS :: VAT Audit
 
 
From the Courts »
 Ravneet Takhar Vs. Commissioner Of Income Tax Ix And Ors.
 Jaiprakash Associates Ltd. Vs. Commissioner Of Income Tax
 Formula One World Championship Limited Vs. Commissioner Of Income Tax, International Taxation-3 And Anr.
 Commissioner Of Income Tax International Taxation-3 Delhi Vs. Formula One World Championship Ltd. And Anr.
 Reliance Communications Ltd vs. DDIT (ITAT Mumbai)
  Sushila Devi vs. CIT (Delhi High Court)
 Ashok Prapann Sharma vs. CIT (Supreme Court)a
  Vatsala Shenoy vs. JCIT (Supreme Court)
  Vatsala Shenoy vs. JCIT (Supreme Court)
 M.K.Overseas Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Pr.Commissioner Of Income Tax-06
 Arshia Ahmed Qureshi Vs. Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-21

Shri Anil J Ojha, 901,Shabri Apartment, Ashok Cross Road No.3, Kandivali East, Mumbai-400101 Vs. Income Tax Officer 25(1)(2), C-11, Pratyakashya Kar Bhavan, Bandra Kurla Complex, Mumbai-400051
August, 11th 2015
               ,   "-  " 
     IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL "SMC" BENCH, MUMBAI

            BEFORE S/SHRI B.R.BASKARAN (Accountant Member)
                    .. ,                       
                  ./I.T.A. No.7439/Mum/2014
                (   / Assessment Year :2004-05)

 Shri Anil J Ojha,               / Income Tax Officer 25(1)(2),
 901,Shabri Apartment,               C-11, Pratyakashya Kar Bhavan,
                                 Vs.
  Ashok Cross Road No.3,             Bandra Kurla Complex,
 Kandivali East,                     Mumbai-400051
 Mumbai-400101
       ( /Appellant)              ..    (    / Respondent)


           . /   . /PAN/GIR No. :AAAPO1598D

             / Appellant by             None
              /Rspondent by             Shri Maurya Pratap


              / Date of Hearing
                                            : 10.8.2015
             /Date of Pronouncement : 10.8.2015

                               / O R D E R

PER BENCH:

        The appeals filed by the assessee is directed against order dated
19.9.2014 passed by passed by the ld.CIT(A)-35, and it relates to the
assessment year 2004-05.





2.      The assessee has sought for adjournment on an earlier occasion
and accordingly the case was posted for hearing on 15.6.2015. However,
he failed to appear on 15.6.2015 and hence notice was sent by RPAD
fixing the date of hearing on 9.7.2015. But on that date also, the assessee
failed to appear. Hence, the case was adjourned today by issuing another
notice by RPAD. Still the assessee did not appear before the Bench today.
                                     2                  I T A N o . 7 4 3 9 / Mu m / 2 0 1 4



Hence, I proceed to dispose of the appeal ex-parte without the presence
of the assessee. I notice that the registry has issued a defect memo to
the assessee and the said defects have not been rectified till the date.
Hence, the appeal filed by the assessee is liable to be dismissed in limine
for this reason alone.





3.      On merits, I notice that the AO has assessed the capital gains
declared by the assessee as income from other sources on the basis of
certain inquiries made by the Income Tax Department. In the appellate
proceedings, the ld. CIT(A) has confirmed the same, vide para 6 of his
order. Before me, no material was placed by the assessee to contradict
the finding given by the ld. CIT(A). Under these set of facts, I have no
other option but to confirm the order passed by the ld. CIT(A).


4.    In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed.


             Pronounced accordingly on 10th August 2015.
                                          10th   August, 2015    

                                             sd
                                         (..  / B.R. BASKARAN)
                                         / ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
  Mumbai: 10th Aug, 2015.


. ../ SRL , Sr. PS

        /Copy of the Order forwarded to :
1.  / The Appellant
2.      / The Respondent.
3.     () / The CIT(A)- concerned
4.      / CIT concerned
5.      ,     ,  /
     DR, ITAT, Mumbai concerned
                       3           I T A N o . 7 4 3 9 / Mu m / 2 0 1 4



6.     / Guard file.

                                      / BY ORDER,
       True copy
                                  (Asstt. Registrar)
                               ,  /ITAT, Mumbai

 
 
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2016 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Binarysoft Technologies - Careers

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions