sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing | GST - Goods and Services Tax
Latest Expert Exchange
From the Courts »
 All India Federation of Tax Practitioners vs. ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
  Suresh M. Jamkhindikar vs. ACIT (Bombay High Court)
  Suresh M. Jamkhindikar vs. ACIT (Bombay High Court)
 Mangammal @ Thulasi vs. T.B. Raju (Supreme Court)
 Mahabir Industries vs. PCIT (Supreme Court)
  Oriental Bank Of Commerce Vs. Additional Commissioner Of Income Tax
  Suresh M. Jamkhindikar vs. ACIT (Bombay High Court)
  Union of India vs. Pirthwi Singh (Supreme Court)
 Cromption Greaves Limited vs. CIT (ITAT Mumbai)
 Director Of Income Tax Vs. M/s. Modiluft Ltd.
 Director Of Income Tax Vs. M/s. Royal Airways Ltd.

Mrs.Afroz Jahan Ashraf Qureshi, 15, Classic Villa CHS, Bandivali Hill Road, Jogeshwari-W, Mumbai-400102, Maharashtra Vs. Income Tax Officer, 24(1)(1), Mumbai-400012.
August, 18th 2015
               ,   "-  " 


                   ./I.T.A. No5128/Mum/2014
                 (   / Assessment Year :2009-10)

 Mrs.Afroz Jahan Ashraf Qureshi,   / Income Tax Officer, 24(1)(1),
 15, Classic Villa CHS,                Mumbai-400012.
 Bandivali Hill Road,
       ( /Appellant)               ..    (    / Respondent)

           . /   . /PAN/GIR No. :AACPQ0456C

             / Appellant by              None
               /Rspondent by             Shri Airiju Jaikran

             / Date of Hearing                : 17.8.2015
             /Date of Pronouncement: 17.8.2015

                                / O R D E R


         The assessee has filed this appeal challenging the order dated
17.4.2014 passed by the ld. CIT(A)-34, Mumbai and it relates to the
assessment year 2009-10.

2.      None appeared on behalf of the assessee even though the notice of
hearing was duly served on the assessee. Hence, we proceed to dispose of
the appeal ex-parte, without the presence of the assessee.

3.      The appeal is barred by limitation by 52 days. The assessee has
filed an affidavit wherein it is stated that her mother expired in the First
                                    2                 I T A N o . 5 1 2 8 / Mu m / 2 0 1 4

week of May, 2014 and hence she was to away from the city to her native
place for about two months. Accordingly, it was submitted that the delay
has occurred due to unavoidable circumstances. We have heard the ld.DR
on this preliminary issue. Having regard to the submissions made in the
affidavit, we condone the delay and admit the appeal for hearing.

4.    The issue contested before us relates to unexplained deposits found
the bank account of the assessee. We notice that the assessee did not
appear before the ld. CIT(A) and hence, the First Appellate Authority has
passed ex-parte order, wherein he has confirmed the addition made by the
AO.   We notice that the ld.CIT(A) has passed the order in the month of
April, 2014 during which period the mother of assessee was ill and
ultimately died in the month of May, 2014. Hence, in the interest of
justice, we are of the view that the assessee should be given one more
opportunity to present her case before the ld. CIT(A). Accordingly, we set
aside the order of ld.   CIT(A) and restore the matter to his file with a
direction to adjudicate the appeal afresh after giving an adequate
opportunity of being heard to the assessee.

5.    In the result, the appeal of the assessee is treated as allowed for
statistical purposes.
             Pronounced accordingly on 17th August 2015.
                                        17th August, 2015    

        SD                                            SD
  (LALIT KUMAR)                                    ( B.R. BASKARAN)
 JUDICIAL MEMBER                                ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
 Mumbai: 17th Aug, 2015.

. ../ SRL , Sr. PS
                           3            I T A N o . 5 1 2 8 / Mu m / 2 0 1 4

        /Copy of the Order forwarded to :
1.  / The Appellant
2.     / The Respondent.
3.     () / The CIT(A)- concerned
4.      / CIT concerned
5.      ,     ,  /
     DR, ITAT, Mumbai concerned
6.     / Guard file.

                                             / BY ORDER,

                                      (Asstt. Registrar)
                                   ,  /ITAT, Mumbai
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2018 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Portal Design Website Design Portal Designing Website Designing Web Design Professional Portal Design Professional Website Design Professional Web Design Portal Design India Website Design India Portal Designing India Website Designing India Web Design India Professional Portal Design India Professional Website Design India Chicago Professional Web Design New York Professional Web Design California Website Design Florida Website Design New Jersey Website Design Britain UK Website Design London Manchester Website Design

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions