Latest Expert Exchange Queries

Make your inventory and invoicing software GST Ready from Binarysoft
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Service Tax | Sales Tax | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Indirect Tax | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing
Popular Search: due date for vat payment :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: cpt :: VAT Audit :: form 3cd :: VAT RATES :: empanelment :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: TDS :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: articles on VAT and GST in India
From the Courts »
 New Delhi Television Ltd vs. ACIT (ITAT Delhi)
 John Fowler (India) Pvt. Ltd vs. DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
 CIT vs. The Mumbai Metropolitan Regional Iron and Steel Market Committee (Bombay High Court)
 KSS Petron Private Ltd vs. ACIT (Bombay High Court)
 JK Mittal & Co vs. UOI (No. 2) (Delhi High Court)
 Pr CIT vs. Shri Mahila Sewa Sahakari Bank Ltd (Gujarat High Court)
 Pr CIT Vs. PPC Business And Products Pvt Ltd (Delhi High Court)
 Commissioner Of Income Tax Central-Iii Vs. M/s. Radico Khaitan Ltd.
 Mastech Technologies Pvt. Ltd Vs. Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax
 Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax Central-3 Vs. Surya Vinayak Industires Ltd.
 Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax Central-3 Vs. J.H. Business India Pvt. Ltd.

Bhoopender Singh, 83, Girdhar Enclave, GT Road, Near-IME College, Sahibabad, Ghaziabad. Vs. ITO, Ward-1(2), Ghaziabad.
August, 27th 2015
             DELHI BENCH : SMC-I : NEW DELHI

                           ITA No.237/Del/2014
                         Assessment Year : 2008-09

Bhoopender Singh,                      Vs.   ITO,
83, Girdhar Enclave,                         Ward-1(2),
GT Road, Near-IME College,                   Ghaziabad.


     (Appellant)                               (Respondent)

           Assessee by : Shri Rajesh Malhotra, CA
           Deptt. by   : Shri R.S. Negi, Sr.DR

           Date of Hearing      : 24.08.2015
           Date of Pronouncement: 26.08.2015


     This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order passed by the

CIT(A) on 19.9.2013 in relation to the assessment year 2008-09.

2.   The only issue raised in this appeal is against the addition of

Rs.3,16,518/- made by the AO u/s 68 of the Income-tax Act, 1961

(hereinafter also called `the Act').
                                                                ITA No.237/Del/2014   2

3.    Shorn of unnecessary details, it is noticed that the assessee could not

file complete evidence before the AO which led to the making of this

addition. An application was filed before the ld. CIT(A) for furnishing

additional evidence, which fact is borne out from page 4 of the impugned

order. The ld. CIT(A) has recorded in his order that the assessee was

allowed time upto 11.9.2013 for filing additional evidence, which the

assessee failed to produce. This resulted into confirmation of addition

made by the AO u/s 68 of the Act.

4.    The case of the assessee is that the ld. CIT(A)'s regular posting is in

Muzafar Nagar and he came on camp to Ghaziabad, where the assessee's

appeal was also listed. The ld. AR submitted that though the ld.CIT(A)

gave time upto 11.9.2013 for filing the additional evidence, but on that date

when the assesee reached there, it was found that no such camp was there in

Ghaziabad. Without providing any further opportunity to the assessee, the

ld. CIT(A) disposed of the appeal.

5.   In my considered opinion, the ends of justice would meet adequately if

the impugned order on this issue is set aside and the matter is restored to the

file of AO for deciding this issue afresh as per law, after affording
                                                                 ITA No.237/Del/2014   3

reasonable a reasonable opportunity of being heard to the assessee.

Needless to say, the assessee will be at liberty to lead any fresh evidence

before the AO in such fresh proceedings.

6.    In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical


      The decision was pronounced in the open court on 26th August,


                                                 (R.S. SYAL)
                                           ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

Dated: 26th August, 2015.


Copy forwarded to

1.   Appellant
2.   Respondent
3.   CIT
4.   CIT(A)
5.   DR
                                             Dy. Registrar, ITAT, New Delhi
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2017 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Portal Design Website Design Portal Designing Website Designing Web Design Professional Portal Design Professional Website Design Professional Web Design Portal Design India Website Design India Portal Designing India Website Designing India Web Design India Professional Portal Design India Professional Website Design India Chicago Professional Web Design New York Professional Web Design California Website Design Florida Website Design New Jersey Website Design Britain UK Website Design London Manchester Website Design

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions