Latest Expert Exchange Queries
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
 
 
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Service Tax | Sales Tax | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Indirect Tax | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing
 
 
 
 
Popular Search: cpt :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: form 3cd :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: empanelment :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: VAT RATES :: TDS :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: VAT Audit :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: due date for vat payment :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT
 
 
From the Courts »
  Vatsala Shenoy vs. JCIT (Supreme Court)
  Vatsala Shenoy vs. JCIT (Supreme Court)
 M.K.Overseas Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Pr.Commissioner Of Income Tax-06
 Arshia Ahmed Qureshi Vs. Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-21
 CHAUDHARY SKIN TRADING COMPANY Vs. PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-21
  Sushila Devi vs. CIT (Delhi High Court)
  Vatsala Shenoy vs. JCIT (Supreme Court)
 Deputy Director Of Income Tax Vs. Virage Logic International
 Commissioner Of Income Tax-3 International Taxation Vs. Virage Logic International India
 Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-06 Vs. Moderate Leasing And Capital Services Pvt. Ltd.
 ITO vs. Vikram A. Pradhan (ITAT Mumbai)

Anil laul, Prop. Anangpur Building Centre, Khera Dhumaspur, Faridabad-121003. Vs. ITO, Ward-38(1), New Delhi
August, 12th 2015
                  IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
                        DELHI BENCH: `A' NEW DELHI

             BEFORE SMT DIVA SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER
                               AND
            SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

                       I.T.A .No.-566/Del/2011
                     (ASSESSMENT YEAR-1997-98)

     Anil laul,                         vs ITO,
     Prop. Anangpur Building Centre,       Ward-38(1),
     Khera Dhumaspur, Faridabad-121003.    New Delhi
     PAN-AABPL5211H
     (APPELLANT)                           (RESPONDENT)

                  Appellant by    None
                  Respondent by   Sh.K.K.Jaiswal, Sr.DR


                        Date of Hearing       11.08.2015
                     Date of Pronouncement    11.08.2015


                                    ORDER

PER DIVA SINGH, JM

     The present appeal has been filed by the assessee against the order dated
09.12.2010 of CIT(A)-XXVIII, New Delhi pertaining to 1997-98 assessment year,
although the impugned order is a consolidated order for 1997-98 & 2000-01
assessment year.     Various grounds have been raised by the assessee in the
present appeal.
2. However, at the time of hearing, no one was present on behalf of the assessee. The record shows that notice for the date of hearing was sent to the assessee on 10.07.2015 at the address mentioned in Column No.-10. Despite this fact, no one was present. The appeal was passed over. The position remained the same in the second round also. Accordingly in the absence of any representation or petition seeking time, it can be safely presumed that the assessee is not serious in pursuing the present appeal. In the circumstances, the only alternative left is to dismiss the appeal of the assessee in limine. I.T.A .No.-566/Del/2011 Support is drawn from the order of the Tribunals in Commissioner of Income- Tax vs. Multi Plan India (P) Ltd.; 38 ITD 320 (Del) and Estate of Late Tukojirao Holkar vs. CWT: 223 ITR 480 (M.P).
3. Before parting it is appropriate to add that in case the assessee is able to show that there was a reasonable cause for non-representation on the date of hearing then it may if so advised pray for a recall of this order and decisions on merits. Respectfully following the order of ITAT in the case of Multiplan (India) Pvt. Ltd. (supra), we hold the appeal to be unadmitted with the liberty to assessee to move appropriate application and correct the defect whatsoever in the memo about its address to ensure a proper hearing of the appeal. The said order was pronounced on the date of hearing itself in the open Court. 4. As a result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed. The order is pronounced in the open court on 11th of August, 2015. Sd/- Sd/- (INTURI RAMA RAO) (DIVA SINGH) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER Dated: 11/08/2015 *Amit Kumar* Copy forwarded to: 1. Appellant 2. Respondent 3. CIT 4. CIT(Appeals) 5. DR: ITAT ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ITAT NEW DELHI Page 2 of 2
 
 
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2016 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Content Management System developers CMS developers Content Management Solutions CMS Solutions CMS India Content Management System India CMS development India Website CMS Website Content Management India Portal CMS India CMS Outsourcing CMS Vendor Complete CMS Custom CMS Services

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions