Latest Expert Exchange Queries

GST Demo Service software link:
Username: demouser Password: demopass
Get your inventory and invoicing software GST Ready from Binarysoft
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing | GST - Goods and Services Tax
Popular Search: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: cpt :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: VAT RATES :: form 3cd :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: empanelment :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: TDS :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: due date for vat payment :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: VAT Audit
From the Courts »
 Order of a Four-Member Appellate Authority constituted under Chartered Accountants Act is Valid: Delhi HC
 Emami Infrastructure Ltd vs. ITO (ITAT Kolkata)
  Anand Agarwal vs. Vilas Chandrakant Gaokar (Bombay High Court)
 Bar Council of India vs. A. K. Balaji & Ors (Supreme Court)
 ITO vs. Venkatesh Premises Co-op Society Ltd (Supreme Court)
 Pr CIT vs. Amphenol Interconnect India P. Ltd (Bombay High Court)
 Pr CIT vs. Amphenol Interconnect India P. Ltd (Bombay High Court)
 Anand Agarwal vs. Vilas Chandrakant Gaokar (Bombay High Court)
 Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central)-I Vs. Smt. Ritu Singal
 Vinod Kumar Gupta Vs. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Central Circle-17
 How you can gift and still save tax on top of HRA, tuition fee, more Income Tax Returns (ITR) filing top hack

Anil laul, Prop. Anangpur Building Centre, Khera Dhumaspur, Faridabad-121003. Vs. ITO, Ward-38(1), New Delhi
August, 12th 2015
                        DELHI BENCH: `A' NEW DELHI


                       I.T.A .No.-566/Del/2011
                     (ASSESSMENT YEAR-1997-98)

     Anil laul,                         vs ITO,
     Prop. Anangpur Building Centre,       Ward-38(1),
     Khera Dhumaspur, Faridabad-121003.    New Delhi
     (APPELLANT)                           (RESPONDENT)

                  Appellant by    None
                  Respondent by   Sh.K.K.Jaiswal, Sr.DR

                        Date of Hearing       11.08.2015
                     Date of Pronouncement    11.08.2015



     The present appeal has been filed by the assessee against the order dated
09.12.2010 of CIT(A)-XXVIII, New Delhi pertaining to 1997-98 assessment year,
although the impugned order is a consolidated order for 1997-98 & 2000-01
assessment year.     Various grounds have been raised by the assessee in the
present appeal.
2. However, at the time of hearing, no one was present on behalf of the assessee. The record shows that notice for the date of hearing was sent to the assessee on 10.07.2015 at the address mentioned in Column No.-10. Despite this fact, no one was present. The appeal was passed over. The position remained the same in the second round also. Accordingly in the absence of any representation or petition seeking time, it can be safely presumed that the assessee is not serious in pursuing the present appeal. In the circumstances, the only alternative left is to dismiss the appeal of the assessee in limine. I.T.A .No.-566/Del/2011 Support is drawn from the order of the Tribunals in Commissioner of Income- Tax vs. Multi Plan India (P) Ltd.; 38 ITD 320 (Del) and Estate of Late Tukojirao Holkar vs. CWT: 223 ITR 480 (M.P).
3. Before parting it is appropriate to add that in case the assessee is able to show that there was a reasonable cause for non-representation on the date of hearing then it may if so advised pray for a recall of this order and decisions on merits. Respectfully following the order of ITAT in the case of Multiplan (India) Pvt. Ltd. (supra), we hold the appeal to be unadmitted with the liberty to assessee to move appropriate application and correct the defect whatsoever in the memo about its address to ensure a proper hearing of the appeal. The said order was pronounced on the date of hearing itself in the open Court. 4. As a result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed. The order is pronounced in the open court on 11th of August, 2015. Sd/- Sd/- (INTURI RAMA RAO) (DIVA SINGH) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER Dated: 11/08/2015 *Amit Kumar* Copy forwarded to: 1. Appellant 2. Respondent 3. CIT 4. CIT(Appeals) 5. DR: ITAT ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ITAT NEW DELHI Page 2 of 2
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2018 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Content Management System developers CMS developers Content Management Solutions CMS Solutions CMS India Content Management System India CMS development India Website CMS Website Content Management India Portal CMS India CMS Outsourcing CMS Vendor Complete CMS Custom CMS Services

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions