Latest Expert Exchange Queries
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Service Tax | Sales Tax | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Indirect Tax | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing
Popular Search: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: empanelment :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: cpt :: VAT Audit :: form 3cd :: TDS :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: VAT RATES :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: due date for vat payment
« From the Courts »
  Dr. Gautam Sen vs. CCIT (Bombay High Court)
 Dr. Gautam Sen vs. CCIT (Bombay High Court)
 DCIT vs. Shivshankar R. Sharma (ITAT Mumbai)
 ACIT vs. Jawaharlal Agicha (ITAT Mumbai)
 CIT vs. M/s. D. Chetan & Co (Bombay High Court)
 Makes further amendments to Notification no. 157/90-Customs dated 28th March, 1990 regarding temporary admission under the ATA Carnet
 Appointment of Common Adjudicating Authority by DGRI - 2/2016-Customs
 ransfers Of Hon’ble Members Of The ITAT (September 2016)
 M. G. Contractors Pvt. Ltd vs. DCIT (ITAT Delhi)
 Haryana State Road & Bridges Development Corporation Ltd vs. CIT (P&H High Court)
 Dharamshibhai Sonani vs. DCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad)

Anil Kumar, WZ-A-76, Gulab Bagh, Uttam Nagar, New Delhi. Vs. ITO, Ward-26(3), New Delhi.
August, 25th 2015
            DELHI BENCH : SMC-1 : NEW DELHI

                        ITA No.1963/Del/2015
                       Assessment Year : 2008-09

Anil Kumar,                       Vs.           ITO,
WZ-A-76, Gulab Bagh,                            Ward-26(3),
Uttam Nagar,                                    New Delhi.
New Delhi.


     (Appellant)                            (Respondent)

           Appellant by : None
           Respondent by: Shri R.S. Negi, Sr.DR

           Date of Hearing      : 24.08.2015
           Date of Pronouncement: 24.08.2015


     This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order passed by the

CIT(A) on 22.01.2015 in relation to Assessment Year 2008-09.

2.   When the matter was called up for hearing today, no one has appeared

on behalf of the assessee. The assessee has not filed any adjournment

application also. The notice of hearing sent to the assessee has not been
                                                              ITA No.1963/Del/2015   2

returned unserved. Earlier, on 23.7.2015 also, when the matter was posted

for hearing, none had appeared for the assessee and the matter was

adjourned to 24.8.2015 under notice of hearing. In these circumstances, it

appears that the assessee is not interested in prosecuting his appeal. The

appeal filed by the assessee is, therefore, liable to be dismissed, for non-

prosecution. My above view finds support from the following decisions:-

    1. CIT vs. B.N. Bhattachargee & anr., 118 ITR 461, wherein their
       Lordships have held:
           "The appeal does not mean merely filing of the appeal but
           effectively pursuing it."

    2. Estate of late Tukojirao Holkar vs. CWT, 223 ITR 480 (M.P.),
       wherein, while dismissing the reference made at the instance of the
       assessee   in   default,   their   Lordships   made   the    following
           "If the party, at whose instance the reference is made, fails to
           appear at the hearing, or fails in taking steps for preparation of
           the reference, the court is not bound to answer the reference."

    3. Commissioner of Income-tax vs. Multiplan India (P.) Ltd, 38 ITD
       320 (Del.),wherein the appeal filed by the revenue before the
       Tribunal, was fixed for hearing. But on the date of hearing nobody
       represented the revenue/appellant nor any communication for
       adjournment was received.          There was no communication or
       information as to why the revenue chose to remain absent on that
                                                                 ITA No.1963/Del/2015   3

          date. The Tribunal on the basis of inherent powers, treated the
          appeal filed by the revenue as unadmitted in view of the provision
          of Rule 19 of the Income-tax (Appellate Tribunal) Rules, 1963.

3.        In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed for non-


          The decision was pronounced in the open court on 24th August,



                                                    (R.S. SYAL)
     J                                         ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

Dated:24th August, 2015.


Copy forwarded to

1.       Appellant
2.       Respondent
3.       CIT
4.       CIT(A)
5.       DR
                                              Dy. Registrar, ITAT, New Delhi
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2016 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Binarysoft Technologies - Our Vision

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions