Latest Expert Exchange Queries

GST Demo Service software link:
Username: demouser Password: demopass
Get your inventory and invoicing software GST Ready from Binarysoft
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing | GST - Goods and Services Tax
Popular Search: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: due date for vat payment :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: VAT Audit :: empanelment :: TDS :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: VAT RATES :: cpt :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: form 3cd :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes
From the Courts »
 Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-7 Vs. Pavitra Commercial Ltd.
 Commissioner Of Income Tax Delhi Iv Vs. Gee Kay Finance & Leasing Co. Ltd.
 Pr.Commissioner Of Income Tax-6 Vs. Nokia Solutions & Network India Pvt Ltd (Formerly Known As, Nokia Siemens Network Pvt Ltd)
 SKY Light Hospitality Llp Vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle -28(1), New Delhi
 Tax outgo may rise for investors in companies undergoing M&A cases
 Rajat B Mehta vs. ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)
 Seema Sabharwal vs. ITO (ITAT Chandigarh)
  Vikram Singh vs. UOI (Delhi High Court)
 Pr CIT vs. Shree Gopal Housing & Plantation Corporation (Bombay High Court)
 Kudrat Sandhu vs. UOI (Supreme Court)
  Vikram Singh vs. UOI (Delhi High Court)

Shri Anil J Ojha, 901,Shabri Apartment, Ashok Cross Road No.3, Kandivali East, Mumbai-400101 Vs. Income Tax Officer 25(1)(2), C-11, Pratyakashya Kar Bhavan, Bandra Kurla Complex, Mumbai-400051
August, 12th 2015
               ,   "-  " 

            BEFORE S/SHRI B.R.BASKARAN (Accountant Member)
                    .. ,                       
                  ./I.T.A. No.7439/Mum/2014
                (   / Assessment Year :2004-05)

 Shri Anil J Ojha,               / Income Tax Officer 25(1)(2),
 901,Shabri Apartment,               C-11, Pratyakashya Kar Bhavan,
  Ashok Cross Road No.3,             Bandra Kurla Complex,
 Kandivali East,                     Mumbai-400051
       ( /Appellant)              ..    (    / Respondent)

           . /   . /PAN/GIR No. :AAAPO1598D

             / Appellant by             None
              /Rspondent by             Shri Maurya Pratap

              / Date of Hearing
                                            : 10.8.2015
             /Date of Pronouncement : 10.8.2015

                               / O R D E R


        The appeals filed by the assessee is directed against order dated
19.9.2014 passed by passed by the ld.CIT(A)-35, and it relates to the
assessment year 2004-05.

2.      The assessee has sought for adjournment on an earlier occasion
and accordingly the case was posted for hearing on 15.6.2015. However,
he failed to appear on 15.6.2015 and hence notice was sent by RPAD
fixing the date of hearing on 9.7.2015. But on that date also, the assessee
failed to appear. Hence, the case was adjourned today by issuing another
notice by RPAD. Still the assessee did not appear before the Bench today.
                                     2                  I T A N o . 7 4 3 9 / Mu m / 2 0 1 4

Hence, I proceed to dispose of the appeal ex-parte without the presence
of the assessee. I notice that the registry has issued a defect memo to
the assessee and the said defects have not been rectified till the date.
Hence, the appeal filed by the assessee is liable to be dismissed in limine
for this reason alone.

3.      On merits, I notice that the AO has assessed the capital gains
declared by the assessee as income from other sources on the basis of
certain inquiries made by the Income Tax Department. In the appellate
proceedings, the ld. CIT(A) has confirmed the same, vide para 6 of his
order. Before me, no material was placed by the assessee to contradict
the finding given by the ld. CIT(A). Under these set of facts, I have no
other option but to confirm the order passed by the ld. CIT(A).

4.    In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed.

             Pronounced accordingly on 10th August 2015.
                                          10th   August, 2015    

                                         (..  / B.R. BASKARAN)
                                         / ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
  Mumbai: 10th Aug, 2015.

. ../ SRL , Sr. PS

        /Copy of the Order forwarded to :
1.  / The Appellant
2.      / The Respondent.
3.     () / The CIT(A)- concerned
4.      / CIT concerned
5.      ,     ,  /
     DR, ITAT, Mumbai concerned
                       3           I T A N o . 7 4 3 9 / Mu m / 2 0 1 4

6.     / Guard file.

                                      / BY ORDER,
       True copy
                                  (Asstt. Registrar)
                               ,  /ITAT, Mumbai
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2018 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Binarysoft Technologies - Achievements

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions