Latest Expert Exchange Queries

GST Demo Service software link: https://ims.go2customer.com
Username: demouser Password: demopass
Get your inventory and invoicing software GST Ready from Binarysoft info@binarysoft.com
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
 
 
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing | GST - Goods and Services Tax
 
 
 
 
Popular Search: form 3cd :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: due date for vat payment :: empanelment :: VAT RATES :: TDS :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: cpt :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: VAT Audit
 
 
From the Courts »
 Abicor and Binzel Technoweld Pvt. Ltd vs. UOI (Bombay High Court)
 CST vs. Shri Krishna Chaitanya Enterprises (Bombay High Court)
 Industrial Infrastructure Development Corporation (Gwalior) M.P. Ltd vs. CIT (Supreme Court)
 Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-7 Vs. Pavitra Commercial Ltd.
 Commissioner Of Income Tax Delhi Iv Vs. Gee Kay Finance & Leasing Co. Ltd.
 Pr.Commissioner Of Income Tax-6 Vs. Nokia Solutions & Network India Pvt Ltd (Formerly Known As, Nokia Siemens Network Pvt Ltd)
 SKY Light Hospitality Llp Vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle -28(1), New Delhi
 Tax outgo may rise for investors in companies undergoing M&A cases
 Rajat B Mehta vs. ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)
 Seema Sabharwal vs. ITO (ITAT Chandigarh)
  Vikram Singh vs. UOI (Delhi High Court)

The Dy. Commissioner of Oncome tax 8(3), Room No. 217, Aayakar Bhavan, M.K. Marg, Mumbai 400 020. Vs. M/s S.B. & T International Ltd., G-3, SEEPZ, Gems & Jewellery Complex, Andher (E), Mumbai- 400 096.
August, 21st 2014
                         "G"                       

   IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL "G"             BENCH,    MUMBAI
BEFORE S/SHRI H.L. KARWA, HON'BLE PRESIDENT AND N.K. BILLAIYA, AM

         .. ,                      .  .  ,                            

                      ./I.T.A. No.4122 /Mum/2010
                (     /     Assessment Year : 2001-2002

   The Dy. Commissioner of           /          M/s S.B. & T
   Oncome tax ­ 8(3),                Vs.        International Ltd.,
   Room No. 217,                                G-3, SEEPZ, Gems &
   Aayakar Bhavan,                              Jewellery Complex,
   M.K. Marg,                                   Andher (E),
   Mumbai ­ 400 020.                            Mumbai- 400 096.
         . / PAN : AAACS7275C
     ( /Appellant)        ..                      (    / Respondent)

        Appellant by                 Smt. Abha Kala Chanda
        Respondent by :              Dr. P. daniel
             / Date of Hearing                     : 19-08-2014
            /Date of Pronouncement : 19-8-2014
                                      [

                                / O R D E R

   PER N.K. BILLAIYA, A.M.                  :
   .    .  ,   

         This appeal by the Revenue is preferred against the order of ld. CIT(A)-
   18 dated 26-02-2010 pertaining to A.Y. 2001-02.

   2.    The revenue has raised six grounds of appeal. At the outset, the ld.
   Representatives of both the sides have agreed that the issues raised by the
   Revenue are squarely covered in favour of the assessee by the earlier order of
   the Tribunal and also by the order of the Hon'ble Supreme Court.
                                    2     ITA 4122/M/10







3.    Ground No. 1 & 2 relates to the exemption u/s 10A of the Income Tax
Act, 1961. The ld. CIT(A) has considered this issue vide para 4 of his order on
page 2 and vide para 4.3. The ld. CIT(A) has followed the decision of the
Tribunal in assessee's own case for A.Y. 1999-2000, 2000-01, 2002-03, 2003-
04 and 2004-05. As the ld. CIT(A) has followed the decision of the Tribunal in
assessee's own case, we do not find any infirmity in the findings of the ld.
CIT(A). Ground No. 1 & 2 are accordingly dismissed.


4.    Ground No. 3 & 4 relates to the deduction u/s 80HHC of the Act on
interest of Rs. 55,76,441/-. This issue has been considered by the ld. CIT(A)
vide para 5 on page 6 of his order. While granting relief to the assessee, the
ld. CIT(A) followed the Special Bench decision of the Tribunal in the case of
Lalson Enterprises, 89 ITD 25.     We find that identical issue came up for
hearing before the Tribunal in ITA No. 4352/Mum/2005 and C.O. No.
89/Mum/2006 and the Tribunal vide its order dated 30-05-2008 has
dismissed this grievance of the Revenue vide para 19 on page No. 10 of its
order. We fail to understand how the Revenue is aggrieved when it has lost its
first round of assessment. Ground No. 3 & 4 are accordingly dismissed.


5.    Ground No. 5 relates to the deduction u/s 80HHC of the Act in respect
of export incentives of Rs. 94,98,048/-. This issue stands covered in favour
of the assessee by the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of
Topman Exports vs. CIT, [2012] 342 ITR 49 (SC). We accordingly direct the
A.O. to decide this issue afresh in the light of the decision of Hon'ble Supreme
Court in the case of Topman Exports (supra).
                                                3        ITA 4122/M/10







      6.      In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed.


              Order pronounced in the open court on 19th August, 2014.

                                          19-8-2014    



                  Sd/-                                                   sd/-
            (H.L. KARWA)                                         (N.K. BILLAIYA)
             /PRESIDENT                                       ACCOUNTANT MEMBER


        Mumbai;
                             Dated           19-8-2014
                                                 [



       . ../ R.K., Sr. PS


                /Copy of the Order forwarded to :
1.    / The Appellant
2.     / The Respondent.
3.     () / The CIT(A)- 18, Mumbai
4.      / CIT- 8, Mumbai
5.             ,     ,   / DR, ITAT, Mumbai G Bench

6.     / Guard file.
                                                                                  / BY ORDER,

                             //True Copy//
                                                               /  (Dy./Asstt.        Registrar)
                                                                   ,  / ITAT, Mumbai

 
 
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2018 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Binarysoft Technologies - Our Portfolio

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions