Latest Expert Exchange Queries
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
 
 
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Service Tax | Sales Tax | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Indirect Tax | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing
 
 
 
 
Popular Search: VAT Audit :: VAT RATES :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: due date for vat payment :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: form 3cd :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: cpt :: TDS :: empanelment :: articles on VAT and GST in India
 
 
Corporate Law »
 Meaning and Scope of ‘Supply’ – Comparative view under Revised Model GST Law vis-à-vis Earlier Model GST Law
 Tax Tribunal issues order against a law firm for forum shopping
 Input Tax Credit under the GST Law
 Tax Return Preparer Under Model ‘gst’ Law
 India unveils first-ever comprehensive draft anti-human trafficking law
 Recent Case Laws On Reverse Charge Mechanism
 The Companies (Auditor S Report) Order, 2016
 Decision to amend Income Tax law retrospectively regrettable
 Times guide to corporate tax
 Clearer interpretation of tax laws needed
 What the proposed corporate law changes mean for retail investors

Tax law penalises buyers for construction delay by builders
August, 11th 2014

My friend, Ajay, called the other day and excitedly told me the under-construction flat that he had bought in 2007 was finally delivered. The builder had promised to deliver the flat in 2010. Ajay was extremely happy that he would, at last, be able to move into his dream home. What had added to his happiness was the fact that he would be able to claim the enhanced interest deduction of Rs 2 lakh for the year as well.

This is when I had to sadly puncture his happiness. I told him that given his facts, the maximum deduction of interest he was eligible for was only Rs 30,000 and not the new limit of Rs 2 lakh. He refused to believe till I explained to him that as he had taken the first loan disbursement in the financial year ending March 31, 2008, and the house was not completed by March 31, 2011, the increased limit of Rs 2 lakh was not applicable to him and the maximum deduction in his case would be Rs 30,000. He cross checked the facts with his tax advisor, who confirmed this.

Ajay wondered why he, a home buyer, was being penalised for a delay that was not his fault in the first place and because of which he had already suffered huge loss. To add insult to injury, his tax deduction was being severely curtailed.

That set me wondering, too. Why was this seemingly unfair provision put in the Income Tax Act in the first place? The limit for deduction of interest payable on a loan taken to acquire a self-occupied property was Rs 30,000 without any other conditionality till 1999. This restriction for completing construction was first put into place by the Finance Bill of 1999, which raised the limit for deduction of interest on a loan taken for a self-occupied property from Rs 30,000 to Rs 75,000 but only for those completed before March 31, 2001. This increase in limit was subsequently enhanced to Rs 1 lakh, Rs 1.50 lakh and finally to Rs 2 lakh by the latest Finance Bill, with the restriction on construction period being adjusted from time to time.

The limit for unconditional deduction has been kept at Rs 30,000 all along. I studied the explanatory memorandum to each of the Finance Bills that put in the construction period restrictions but none mentioned any specific reasons for these restrictions.

The only speculation I can make for this seemingly unfair restriction was that till only a few decades ago self-construction of houses was the norm rather than the exception it is today and the tax authorities wanted to encourage people to build their house quickly, rather than buy a plot of land and keep it vacant to speculate on land prices. I don't think they envisaged that more than 70 per cent of home loans would be given out for acquiring under-construction properties from independent developers. At that time, it might have been difficult for them to envisage that delays would be endemic to the whole building process, mostly because of delay in approvals from the government authorities themselves, as well as fund shortage for the developers.

At that time, nobody would have thought a construction period of three to four years would be grossly inadequate. As a result of this lack of understanding, the home buyers are hit by a double whammy. They have to pay pre-EMI (equated monthly instalment) interest during the construction period for long periods and this pre-EMI interest enjoys no deduction at that time. Then the total limit for deduction is restricted to Rs 30,000 a year if the construction period exceeds four years, which again has unfortunately become the norm rather than the exception nowadays.

The only reason it has not become a big issue till now is that tax returns do not capture information about construction periods. Hence, most home buyers are going ahead and claiming the enhanced deduction, blissfully unaware that they will be liable for penal interest if their income tax returns be opened for detailed scrutiny. Luckily for them, most tax returns are nowadays accepted as filed and even when opened for scrutiny, most assessing officers are equally unaware of this restrictive provision.

This happy state of affairs cannot last for long, given the huge collection targets that the tax department has. It would be in the fitness of things that the tax law is amended to remove this unnecessary restriction on construction period or at least be appropriately amended to make such restrictions apply only when the tax payer is doing self-construction. Till that is done, the least all home buyers like Ajay can do is be aware of these tax provisions and make sure they buy properties either ready to move in or at least at a stage such that the completion will not exceed the three-year period.

 
 
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2016 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Portal Design Website Design Portal Designing Website Designing Web Design Professional Portal Design Professional Website Design Professional Web Design Portal Design India Website Design India Portal Designing India Website Designing India Web Design India Professional Portal Design India Professional Website Design India Chicago Professional Web Design New York Professional Web Design California Website Design Florida Website Design New Jersey Website Design Britain UK Website Design London Manchester Website Design

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions