Latest Expert Exchange Queries
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Service Tax | Sales Tax | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Indirect Tax | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing
Popular Search: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: empanelment :: form 3cd :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: VAT Audit :: VAT RATES :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: due date for vat payment :: cpt :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: TDS :: articles on VAT and GST in India
« From the Courts »
  Dr. Gautam Sen vs. CCIT (Bombay High Court)
 Dr. Gautam Sen vs. CCIT (Bombay High Court)
 DCIT vs. Shivshankar R. Sharma (ITAT Mumbai)
 ACIT vs. Jawaharlal Agicha (ITAT Mumbai)
 CIT vs. M/s. D. Chetan & Co (Bombay High Court)
 Makes further amendments to Notification no. 157/90-Customs dated 28th March, 1990 regarding temporary admission under the ATA Carnet
 Appointment of Common Adjudicating Authority by DGRI - 2/2016-Customs
 ransfers Of Hon’ble Members Of The ITAT (September 2016)
 M. G. Contractors Pvt. Ltd vs. DCIT (ITAT Delhi)
 Haryana State Road & Bridges Development Corporation Ltd vs. CIT (P&H High Court)
 Dharamshibhai Sonani vs. DCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad)

Shri Devesh Agarwal C/o M/s Ravi and Dev, Chartered Accountant, 377-B, First Floor, Jagannath Shankar Seth Marg, Chira Bazar, Mumbai-400002. Vs. Assistant tissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle -32,Mumbai.
August, 06th 2014
                   ,                  ""          

       .. ,                                      ,      

                 ./I.T.A. No.8918 & 8919/Mum/2010
           (   / Assessment Years : 2004-05 & 2003-04)

 Shri Devesh Agarwal               /        Assistant Commissioner of Income
 C/o M/s Ravi and Dev, Chartered   Vs.      Tax, Central Circle -32,Mumbai.
 Accountant, 377-B, First Floor,
 Jagannath Shankar Seth Marg,
 Chira Bazar, Mumbai-400002.
       ( /Appellant)               ..       (    / Respondent)

          . /   . /PAN/GIR No. :AEKPA7464G

           / Appellant by               :   Shri Devendera A Mehta
              /Respondent by :              Shri Santosh Kumar

             / Date of Hearing
                                                : 11.7.2014
            /Date of Pronouncement : 31.7.2014

                                 / O R D E R

Per B.R.BASKARAN, Accountant Member:

      Both the appeals filed by the Assessee are directed against the common

order dated 25.11.2010 passed by the ld. CIT(A)-41, Mumbai and they relate to

the assessment years 2003-04 and 2004-05.

2.    Since identical issues are urged in both     the appeals, they were heard

together and are being decided by this common order, for the sake of

                                                     I.T.A. No.8918 & 8919/Mum/2010
                                        2                                             I   I   T   I   T   A

3.    The Assessee, inter-alia, has raised a legal issue, viz., whether the

additions made in the assessment order passed u/s 143(3) r.w.s.153A of the

Income Tax Act, 1961(the Act) for both the years under consideration is

sustainable in the absence of any incriminating material found in the search

proceedings for these two years, particularly in view of the fact that these two

years fall in the category of completed assessments and hence the previous

assessment orders do not abate.

4.    We prefer to adjudicate this legal issue first. The facts relating thereto are

stated in brief. The   search and seizure operation u/s 132(1) of the Act was

conducted on 3.1.2008 in the case of Evershine Group. The assessee was also

subjected to search in connection thereof. Subsequent to the search and seizure

operation, the AO issued notice u/s 153A of the Act for both the years under

consideration.   In the proceedings re-opened u/s 153A of the Act, the AO

assessed gifts received by the Assessee in both the years as the income of the

assessee by invoking the provisions of sec. 68 of the Act. The AO also made

disallowance u/s 14A of the Act in both the years.

5.    The contentions of the assessee are that the assessment for both the

years under consideration fall in the category of "completed assessment" and

hence the earlier assessment orders do not get abated by the provisions of

section 153A.    It is also submitted that the search team did not unearth any

incriminating material during the course of search which would warrant the

impugned additions made by the AO in both the years. Accordingly, by placing

reliance on the decision rendered by the Mumbai Special Bench in the case of All
                                                    I.T.A. No.8918 & 8919/Mum/2010
                                         3                                            I   I   T   I   T   A

Cargo Global Logistic Ltd V/s DCIT (2012) 137 ITR (SB) (Mum), ld. AR contended

that the impugned additions are liable to be deleted.

6.       On the contrary, the ld. DR submitted that the AO has made a reference

to seized documents marked as "A-1" in the assessment order. Accordingly, he

submitted that there is a possibility that the impugned additions are based on

the incriminating materials. However, ld. AR submitted that seized documents

contained in "A-1" contained only financial statements which were already

available with the AO. He submitted that the Ld D.R should have brought the

seized materials marked as "A-1", if he wanted to place reliance on it. Hence,

the Ld D.R was asked to produce the above said seized materials. However, the

Ld D.R submitted that he cannot bring it immediately, but agreed to examine the

copies of the same, if it is furnished by the Ld A.R.   In reply thereto, the Ld A.R

agreed to produce copies of seized material marked as "A-1" and accordingly

produced the same. During the course of hearing, the ld. DR scrutinized the

copies of the seized materials marked as "A-1" and fairly admitted that it does

not contain any incriminating material supporting the additions made in both the


7.       We have heard the rival contentions of the parties and perused the

material available on record.    It is an admitted fact that both the years under

consideration are falling in the category of "completed assessments".                The

Hon'ble Special Bench of the Tribunal in the case of All Cargo Global Logistic Ltd

(supra) has held that in the assessment orders falling in the category of

completed assessments do not abate and hence the additions can be made in

those years only on the basis of incriminating material found during the course
                                                  I.T.A. No.8918 & 8919/Mum/2010
                                        4                                          I   I   T   I   T   A

of search. We notice that the Co-ordinate Bench of the Tribunal has considered

an identical issue in one of the Group cases of the assessee viz., M/s Govind

Agarwal (HUF) V/s DCIT in ITA No.8917/Mum/2010 (AY-2005-06) and the

Tribunal, in its order dated 16.5.2013, has held as under by following the

decision rendered by the Special Bench:-

      "7.     In this case, the question answered in clause (b) would be
      applicable as the addition in the assessment order passed under section
      153A, can be made only on the basis of incriminating material found in
      the course of search in case where the assessment has already been
      finalized. Thus, in this case, no addition can be made over and above the
      returned income which has become final prior to the date of search and
      there is no material found at the time of search. The aforesaid Mumbai
      Special Bench decision of the Tribunal in All Cargo Global Logistic Ltd.
      (supra) has also been reaffirmed and applied by the co-ordinate bench in
      Gurinder Singh Bawa (supra). The relevant observation of the Tribunal is
      reproduced herein below:-

             "6. We have perused the records and considered the rival
             contentions carefully. The dispute raised is regarding legal validity
             of addition made by AO under section 153A of the Act. Under the
             provisions of section 153A, in all cases, where search is conducted
             under section 132 of the Act, AO is empowered to assess or
             reassess total income of six assessment years preceding the
             assessment year in which search was conducted. The section also
             provides that assessment or reassessment relating to any
             assessment year falling within period of six assessment year if
             pending on the date of initiation of search shall abate. There have
             been divergent views regarding scope of application of section
             153A in cases where no incriminating material was found indicating
             any undisclosed income. Some of the Tribunal Benches had taken
             the view that in case no incriminating material was found AO had
             no jurisdiction to make assessment or reassessment under section
             153A while some other Benches held that jurisdiction under section
             153A was automatic to reassess six immediate preceding
             assessment years irrespective of the fact whether any incriminating
             material was found or not. Another aspect on which there had been
             divergent views was whether even if AO had jurisdiction under
             section 153A, addition can be made in assessment / reassessment
             only when some incriminating material has been found. All these
             aspects had been referred to the Special Bench of the Tribunal in
                                                   I.T.A. No.8918 & 8919/Mum/2010
                                        5                                           I   I   T   I   T   A

             case of Alcargo Global Logistics Ltd. and order of Special Bench
             dated 6.7.2012 has been referred.

             6.1 The Special bench in the case of Alcargo Global Logistics Ltd.
             (supra), has held that provisions of section 153A come into
             operation if a search or requisition is initiated after 31.5.2003 and
             on satisfaction of this condition, the AO is under obligation to issue
             notice to the person requiring him to furnish the return of income
             for six years immediately preceding the year of search. The Special
             Bench further held that in case assessment has abated, the AO
             retains the original jurisdiction as well as jurisdiction under section
             153A for which assessment shall be made for each assessment
             year separately. Thus in case where assessment has abated the AO
             can make additions in the assessment, even if no incriminating
             material has been found. But in other cases the Special Bench held
             that the assessment under section 153A can be made on the basis
             of incriminating material which in the context of relevant provisions
             means books of account and other documents found in the course
             of search but not produced in the course of original assessment
             and undisclosed income or property disclosed during the course of
             search. In the present case, the assessment had been completed
             under summary scheme under section 143(1) and time limit for
             issue of notice under section 143(2) had expired on the date of
             search. Therefore, there was no assessment pending in this case
             and in such a case there was no question of abatement. Therefore,
             addition could be made only on the basis of incriminating material
             found during search."

      Thus, on the facts of the case, we hold that the additions made by the
      Assessing Officer with regard to unexplained gift of `10,00,000, made
      under section 68 and disallowance of `1,01,300 under section 14A, are
      beyond the scope of section 153A / 153C. Consequently, we set aside the
      impugned order passed by the learned Commissioner (Appeals) and on
      the preliminary ground itself, both the additions are deleted. Thus, the
      issues arising out of the ground are treated as allowed.

8.    Consistent with the view taken by the Tribunal in the above said case, we

also hold that the impugned additions made in both the years under

consideration are liable to be deleted, since there was no incriminating material

which supported the said additions. Accordingly, we set aside the order passed
                                                  I.T.A. No.8918 & 8919/Mum/2010
                                        6                                          I   I   T   I   T   A

by ld. CIT(A) on the issues contested before us and direct the AO to delete the

impugned additions in both the years.

9.    In the result, both the appeals filed by the Assessee are allowed.

      The above order was pronounced in the open court on 31st July, 2014.

           31st July, 2014    

      Sd                                         sd

(   / VIVEK VARMA)                           (..  / B.R. BASKARAN)
     / JUDICIAL MEMBER                         / ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

  Mumbai: 31st

. ../ SRL , Sr. PS

        /Copy of the Order forwarded to :
1.  / The Appellant
2.  / The Respondent.
3.     () / The CIT(A)- concerned
4.      / CIT concerned
5.      ,     ,                   /
     DR, ITAT, Mumbai concerned
6.     / Guard file.
                                                              / BY ORDER,
             True copy
                                                     (Asstt. Registrar)
                                       ,  /ITAT, Mumbai
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2016 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Portal Design Website Design Portal Designing Website Designing Web Design Professional Portal Design Professional Website Design Professional Web Design Portal Design India Website Design India Portal Designing India Website Designing India Web Design India Professional Portal Design India Professional Website Design India Chicago Professional Web Design New York Professional Web Design California Website Design Florida Website Design New Jersey Website Design Britain UK Website Design London Manchester Website Design

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions