Latest Expert Exchange Queries
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
 
 
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Service Tax | Sales Tax | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Indirect Tax | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing
 
 
 
 
Popular Search: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: cpt :: due date for vat payment :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: form 3cd :: VAT RATES :: TDS :: empanelment :: VAT Audit
 
 
« Transfer Pricing »
 Offshore transfer of IP assets by pharma firms under RBI radar
 RBI eyes offshore transfer of IP assets by pharma firms
 Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) signs two Unilateral Advance Pricing Agreements (APAs) with Indian taxpayers
 Duff & Phelps Acquires Leading Transfer Pricing Asia-Pacific Advisory Firm
  Updated UN manual reveals India’s transfer pricing positions
  Transfer pricing: Centre moves forward, introduces ‘secondary adjustments’
 India Issues First Comprehensive Report on Advance Pricing Accords
 Godrej & Boyce Manufacturing Co Ltd vs. DCIT (Supreme Court)
  Domestic transfer pricing leeway provides a loophole for Indian companies
 CBDT signs two unilateral APAs with taxpayers
 India signs record 88 APAs in FY17

Multistate Tax Commission Targets Summer 2015 Implementation of Transfer Pricing Effort
August, 13th 2014

On July 28, the Arm’s Length Adjustment Services Advisory Group (Group) of the Multistate Tax Commission (MTC) met for the third time at the MTC Annual Conference in Albuquerque, New Mexico. The Group began this effort on June 2 and met again on June 25 in furtherance of a Summer 2015 deadline to implement its transfer pricing model.

The Group established the following projected milestones:

November 2014 – Group will complete draft of Preliminary Design
December 2014 – Present draft to Executive Committee
March 2015 – Target for completion of the Final Design
July / August 2015 – Target for implementation
Using External Economists

Consistent with the Group’s prior two meetings, the discussion focused primarily on increasing the ability of states and the MTC to analyze intercompany transactions. While taxpayers typically engage economists to ensure accurate intercompany pricing, states have not traditionally done the same when conducting audits. Dan Bucks, project facilitator, engaged several firms specializing in transfer pricing economics to determine how—and at what cost—the MTC could utilize these firms when conducting transfer pricing audits. As was predicted, the cost of hiring these firms is high—and perhaps prohibitively so.

The Group plans to meet in Atlanta on October 6 with up to seven firms to explore engaging them. Some firms have indicated that their expertise could be leveraged to eventually increase the capacity of states to conduct economic analysis without the assistance of outside firms. Others, however, have resisted that transference of expertise to the states and thus envision their role as full-service audit assistance.

The Group is continuing to consider the ability of the MTC to hire an internal economic expert to work in tandem with an outside firm. While there was no clear consensus about the appropriate level of involvement by an outside firm, there was a clear sense of anticipation among the Group’s members that these issues should be resolved at the October 6 meeting.

Developing In-House Skills

Beyond hiring an outside firm (or firms) to assist with the audit process, the Group discussed to what extent states can implement their own internal procedures to increase their ability to conduct transfer pricing audits. For instance, the Group considered training state auditors to request the proper documents from the taxpayer at the beginning of the audit process. At this point, the District of Columbia reiterated its purported success in preemptively identifying taxpayers for transfer pricing audits. An additional component of increasing the states’ ability to conduct transfer pricing audits is establishing a robust information sharing program. One recommendation was to hire an MTC employee to coordinate the sharing of taxpayer-provided information among the states. The Group conceded that this is likely a sensitive issue for taxpayers.

The MTC also envisions providing comprehensive training for state employees. Similar to its “nexus school,” the MTC proposes to provide detailed transfer pricing training to state auditors. Because transfer pricing is a recent focus of the MTC, the training classes would likely begin at a fairly rudimentary level, with the hope of increased sophistication over time. The MTC would provide additional training for litigating transfer pricing issues.

Incorporating Transfer Pricing Audits into Existing MTC Audit Structure?

The Group again broached the controversial issue of how the MTC may incorporate transfer pricing into its audit process. The topic was discussed at both prior meetings, with little consensus being reached. Bucks indicated that there are three options for conducting transfer pricing audits: (1) joint audits solely for transfer pricing issues; (2) a comprehensive audit program that incorporates transfer pricing issues operating parallel to the current MTC audit program; or (3) incorporating transfer pricing into the existing MTC audit program. Not only is there disagreement about the need for an MTC-directed audit for transfer pricing issues (Florida, for example, has repeatedly indicated it would not participate in a joint audit), but there is also disagreement over how the audit process would work. Five states indicated that the audit service would potentially be utilized, and four indicated that such a service is not a priority. Bucks indicated that his preference is to incorporate the transfer pricing audits into the existing MTC audit program. The continued debate over the audit process makes it the controversial component of the Group’s mission.

Next Steps

With the self-imposed November deadline to complete its preliminary draft, the Group has set the following meetings for the coming months:

August / September 2014 – Bucks will conduct interviews with states involved in the project
Week of September 22, 2014 – Meeting via teleconference
October 6, 2014 – Meeting with economics consulting firms in Atlanta
October 7, 2014 – Meeting to discuss meeting with firms in Atlanta
All meetings are open to the public, and interested parties are encouraged to participate in the public comment portion of each meeting.

 
 
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2017 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Binarysoft Technologies - Careers

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions