sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing | GST - Goods and Services Tax
Latest Expert Exchange
« From the Courts »
 ITAT Bar Objects To ITAT Registrar Acting As “Court” And Causing Hardship To Taxpayers
 Sunil Agarwal vs. ITO (ITAT Delhi)
 M/s A Daga Royal Arts vs. ITO (ITAT Jaipur)
 Gagan Infraenergy Ltd vs. DCIT (ITAT Delhi)
 PCIT vs. Chawla Interbild Construction Co. Pvt. Ltd (Bombay High Court)
 All India Federation of Tax Practitioners vs. ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
  Suresh M. Jamkhindikar vs. ACIT (Bombay High Court)
  Suresh M. Jamkhindikar vs. ACIT (Bombay High Court)
 Mangammal @ Thulasi vs. T.B. Raju (Supreme Court)
 Mahabir Industries vs. PCIT (Supreme Court)
  Oriental Bank Of Commerce Vs. Additional Commissioner Of Income Tax

M/s. Infolink Solutions Pvt. Ltd 67/2900, Gandhinagar Jalkiran CHS Ltd. Gandhinagar, Bandra (E) Mumbai 400 051 Vs. DCIT-1(2) Mumbai
August, 29th 2014
                       MUMBAI BENCH "I", MUMBAI
                       ITA No. 1685/Mum/2011
                      Assessment Year: 2007-08
         M/s. Infolink Solutions Pvt.          DCIT-1(2)
         Ltd.                                  Mumbai
         67/2900, "Gandhinagar
         Jalkiran CHS Ltd."
         Gandhinagar, Bandra (E)
         Mumbai 400 051
         PAN: AAACI 9120 N
                (Appellant)                        (Respondent)

                          Assessee by          Shri K. Shivram & Rahul
                            Revenue by    :    Shri Sunil Agrawal
                     Date of hearing  : 01.07.2014
                Date of Pronouncement : 28.08.2014


      This appeal filed by the Assessee is directed against the order of the
Ld.CIT(A)-2, Mumbai dated 06.02.2010 for the Assessment Year 2007-08.

2.    In Ground No. 1, the assessee has agitated the decision of the Ld.CIT(A)
confirming the disallowance of Rs.1,12,647/- made by the AO u/s 14A of the
Income-tax Act read with Rule 8D of the Income-tax Rules.

2.1   Briefly stated, during the year under consideration, the assessee had earned a
dividend income of Rs.4,284/- and claimed the same as exempt income and no
expense was assigned to such exempt income. In the assessment framed, the AO
observed that the investment as on 01.04.2006 was Rs.78,45,995/- and the
assessee had share capital and reserve of Rs.21.99 lakhs only, the assessee had
loan funds of Rs.2.73 crores which according to the AO clearly showed that
borrowed funds were utilized in acquisition of shares. Therefore, the AO held that
the assessee had incurred direct and indirect expenses in earning the dividend
                                                                       ITA No. 1685/Mum/2011
                                          2                          M/s. Infolink Solutions Pvt. Ltd.
                                                                     Assessment Year: 2007-08

income. Accordingly, the AO applied Rule 8D and thereby disallowed the impugned
expenses of Rs.1,12,647/-. On appeal, the Ld.CIT(A) upheld the action of the AO.
Aggrieved by the impugned decision, the assessee has raised this ground in the
appeal before us.

2.2   Having heard both the sides and perused the material on record, it is a fact
that the relevant assessment year 2007-08 under consideration is outside the scope
of provisions of Rule 8D. The said provisions cannot be treated as applicable to the
A.Y.2007-08 under consideration indirectly when the same is precluded by the
Hon'ble Bombay High Court in the case of Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd. Vs. DCIT,
[(2010) 328 ITR 81(Bom)]. Also, the Hon'ble Bombay High Court, in the case of CIT
vs. M/s. Godrej Agrovet Ltd vide Income Tax Appeal No. 934 of 2011, dated
8.1.2013, has held that percentage of the exempt income can constitute a
reasonable estimate for making the disallowance in the years earlier to the
assessment year 2008-09. The relevant portion of the said judgment of the Bombay
High Court (supra) reads as under:

      "So far as question (b) is concerned, the Tribunal in its impugned order
      dated 17.9.2010 while applying the decision of this court in the matter
      of Godrej (supra) has disallowed the expenditure only to the extent of
      2% of the total exempt income earned by the respondent-assessee on
      the basis its order dated 27.2.2009 for the assessment year 2002-2003
      and order dated 10.9.2009 for the Assessment Years 2003-2004 and
      2004-2005 wherein disallowance was restricted to 2% of the exempt
      income. Further; the Tribunal has remanded the matter to the AO to
      verify the disallowance claimed and restrict the disallowance only to the
      extent to 2% of the total exempt income. We find no fault with the
      order of the Tribunal. "

Considering the said decision, we direct the AO to quantify the disallowance in the
light of the aforesaid judgments of the Hon'ble Bombay High Court. Accordingly, the
issue raised in grounds No.1 to 3 stands partly allowed.

3.    In Grounds No. 2 and 3, the assessee has agitated the decision of the
Ld.CIT(A) in holding the loss of Rs.29,73,363/- from sale of shares assessable as
income from business activity.
                                                                         ITA No. 1685/Mum/2011
                                           3                           M/s. Infolink Solutions Pvt. Ltd.
                                                                       Assessment Year: 2007-08

3.1    The relevant facts are that during the year under consideration, the assessee
had a loss of Rs.1.03 crores in future and options transactions and the assessee had
disclosed Rs.29,73,363/- as loss on sale of shares which had been claimed as a short
term capital loss. According to the AO, the said transactions in shares had the
characteristics of trading and not investments. Accordingly, the AO treated the said
loss as speculative loss and thereby held not allowed to adjust the same against any
other income but only be allowed to be carried forward and to set off against
speculative income in the next year. On appeal, the Ld.CIT(A) upheld the decision of
the AO treating the loss on sale of shares as a business loss and further upheld the
decision of the AO that the loss on sale of shares was to be held as speculation loss
not allowed to be set off against any other income. Aggrieved by the impugned
decision, the assessee has raised these ground in appeal before us.

3.2    Having heard both the sides and perused the material on record, it is noted
that the assessee's main business is not dealing in shares and during the relevant
assessment year, the assessee has dealt with only three scrips, namely GTL, Crest
Animation and RCVL. The total numbers of sale transactions are only 13 out of 3
scrips, two scrips have been accepted as investment in earlier year. As far as GTL is
concerned, price of the shares increased by more than Rs.10 in one day and hence
the assessee has sold the same immediately. However, later on the price of the
share kept on declining, the assessee held some shares for more than 30 days. As
share prices kept on falling, the assessee held all the shares. In this connection, we
are inclined to accept the contention of the assessee that only period of holding
cannot be the criteria and the entire activity is to be seen as a whole. Moreover, it is
pertinent to mentioned that the shares are held as investment by the assessee and
explanation to section 73 cannot invoked and gains/losses have to be treated as
capital gain/losses. The said proposition is supported by various decision in the cases
of Sterlite Industries (India) Ltd. Vs. ACIT 2006 (6SOT 497) (Mum), Krishna Laxhmi
Multi Trade Pvt. Ltd. Vs. ACIT (2011) 130 ITD 584 (Ahm). It is also relevant to state
that in the A.Y. 2008-09, in the assessment completed u/s 143(3) read with 153(C),
the AO has allowed set off of the loss as short term capital loss. In view of that
matter, we are of the considered view that the authorities below are not justified in
                                                                        ITA No. 1685/Mum/2011
                                         4                            M/s. Infolink Solutions Pvt. Ltd.
                                                                      Assessment Year: 2007-08

treating the impugned loss as speculation losses. Thus, Ground No 2 & 3 are

4.      In the result, the appeal filed by the Assessee is treated as partly

     Order pronounced in the open court on this 28th day of August, 2014.

               Sd/-                                               Sd/-
         (N.K. BILLAIYA)                                (Dr. S.T.M. PAVALAN)
        ACCOUNTANT MEMBER                                  JUDICIAL MEMBER

Mumbai, Dated: 28.08.2014

Copy to: The Appellant
         The Respondent
         The CIT, Concerned, Mumbai
         The CIT(A) Concerned, Mumbai
         The DR "I" Bench
                                 //True Copy//

                                                     By Order

                                        Dy/Asstt. Registrar, ITAT, Mumbai.
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2018 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Binarysoft Technologies - Our Vision

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions