Latest Expert Exchange Queries
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Service Tax | Sales Tax | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Indirect Tax | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing
Popular Search: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: form 3cd :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: VAT RATES :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: due date for vat payment :: cpt :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: empanelment :: VAT Audit :: TDS :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: list of goods taxed at 4%
« News Headlines »
 India is moving towards a flawed GST
 ICAI to organise two-day international conference in Hyderabad
 Here's how to calculate tax payable on your capital gains
 Income Tax calculations for the financial year 2016-17
 CPE Events 17 October - 22 October 2016
 High Court raps I-T Department for wrong tax demand
  CBDT signs 5 advance pricing pacts with Indian taxpayers
 Finance ministry warns tax officials of action against GST protest
 Big changes for small units under GST
 Parliament’s winter session to begin on November 16 to expedite GST rollout
 Income-tax (27th Amendment) Rules, 2016 - 92/2016

Mindless tinkering of tax rules must stop
August, 04th 2014

The list of Section 80C options should have simpler products chosen for their long-term benefits
The government tinkers with tax every year when it announces the Budget. One year, they announce new bonds with tax-free interest and then they stop these bonds. Another year, infrastructure bonds enjoy a tax deduction -and soon they are excluded. They offer tax-free interest in savings schemes, then withdraw them, and then bring them back again. The less we speak about ill-thought-out schemes such as the RGESS, the better. What is it that lacks in the government's policy on tax-saving investments?

First, the government must give up a rigid position on how much saving is desirable and, therefore, worthy of incentives. There is a constant clamour for raising the limit under Section 80C.

The new limit of Rs 1.5 lakh is too high for someone with an annual income of Rs 6 lakh. For someone with a Rs 60 lakh income, it is too small. The limits under this section are controlled in terms of `tax-foregone' while completely ignoring the benefits of access to long-term funds. When redefined as a percentage of income, the government actually replaces tax revenue with long-term capital for itself, and tax outgo for the investor with long-term investment for building wealth. Defining the tax-deductible savings as a percentage of the taxpayer's income would serve both purposes — adequate savings by households, and adequate capital for the government.

Bold measures that alter the direction of cash flows from annual revenue to long-term capital may work much better than fragmented thinking about revenue collection each year.

Second, the list of products that enjoy tax concessions should be simple, easy to understand, and fairly homogenous in terms of the purpose they serve for both the household and the government. There is little merit in putting 5-year bank deposits and 15-year PPFs in the same list. There is confusion in making interest taxable in some cases and tax free in others. There is needless innovation in bringing products such as RGESS that serve no useful purpose. There is irresponsibility in stipulating shorter lock-in periods for long-term investments such as Ulips and ELSS. And, there is no merit in bringing newer products like KVP (Kisan Vikas Patra) when the same post office is offering NSCs. The list under Section 80C is governed by the ill-founded idea of using tax incentives to 'direct' investments to specific products. It should instead hold a smaller range of simple products, chosen for their long-term benefit. Each one of them should enable reduction in known investment risks.

Including products that ask investors to buy liabilities or equity shares of a specific entity, even a PSU, is irresponsible.

Not stipulating performance benchmarks and allowing every PSU, mutual fund and insurer to offer products that attract tax payers' money, is equally irresponsible. A basket of debt and equity products, each one of them structured in the simplest possible way, either diversified or issued by the government, screened for performance and process, should be in the list. This will enable investors to build a portfolio that meets their requirements for returns and risks.

Third, there is no overlooking the need for promotion and distribution.

Investors are unlikely to make decisions about financial products unless they are exposed to materials that draw their attention to the merits of the product.

Such products need to be available with distributors who can help investors buy them. We have tied ourselves in knots trying to impose upon the simple feeton-street salesman the imperative to become a financial planner and advisor.

There are millions in this country, who will provide simple products to investors if all they have to do is sell. Our worries about mis-selling have completely condemned this useful link out of existence or worse, over-incentivised those who stayed. If tax saving products are promoted for their simple features and merit, and compete with one another only on the basis of their suitability to a saver, distributors will be willing to sell them for a lower incentive. We should be able to see them as we see newspaper vendors, who provide the papers of our choice at a low commission to themselves. By making the whole financial distribution piece exotic, and requiring everyone to upgrade or perish, what we have created are perverse structures that front-end commissions and pay distributors much more than the actual value they bring to the system. We also create high entry barriers were minimum gatekeeping will do.

I suggest a simple test: Find out how many taxpayers have a PPF account and ask them why they use a product that is so long term. Changes to rates or reduction and final elimination of commissions have not impacted its popularity.

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2016 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Binarysoft Technologies - Our Portfolio

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions