Latest Expert Exchange Queries
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
 
 
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Service Tax | Sales Tax | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Indirect Tax | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing
 
 
 
 
Popular Search: VAT RATES :: VAT Audit :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: TDS :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: due date for vat payment :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: empanelment :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: cpt :: form 3cd :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT
 
 
From the Courts »
  Vatsala Shenoy vs. JCIT (Supreme Court)
  Vatsala Shenoy vs. JCIT (Supreme Court)
 M.K.Overseas Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Pr.Commissioner Of Income Tax-06
 Arshia Ahmed Qureshi Vs. Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-21
 CHAUDHARY SKIN TRADING COMPANY Vs. PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-21
  Sushila Devi vs. CIT (Delhi High Court)
  Vatsala Shenoy vs. JCIT (Supreme Court)
 Deputy Director Of Income Tax Vs. Virage Logic International
 Commissioner Of Income Tax-3 International Taxation Vs. Virage Logic International India
 Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-06 Vs. Moderate Leasing And Capital Services Pvt. Ltd.
 ITO vs. Vikram A. Pradhan (ITAT Mumbai)

DCIT-1(3) R. No. 540/564, 5th Floor, Aayakar Bhavan, M.K.Road, New Marine Lines, Mumbai 400 020 Vs. The Zoroastrian Co-op Bank Ltd. Iron House, 5th Floor, Annie Besant Road, Worli, Mumbai- 400 030
August, 27th 2014
                 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL,
                       MUMBAI BENCH "G", MUMBAI
            BEFORE SHRI N.K. BILLAIYA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
               AND DR. S.T.M. PAVALAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER
                        ITA No. 1215/Mum/2011
                       Assessment Year: 2004-05
         DCIT-1(3)                                The Zoroastrian Co-op
         R. No. 540/564, 5th Floor,               Bank Ltd.
         Aayakar Bhavan, M.K.              Vs.    Iron House, 5th Floor,
         Road, New Marine Lines,                  Annie Besant Road, Worli,
         Mumbai ­ 400 020                         Mumbai- 400 030
                                                  PAN: AAAAZ 0071 B
                (Appellant)                          (Respondent)


                           Assessee by      :    Shri S.P. Bulsara
                            Revenue by      :    Smt. Parminder
                      Date of hearing  : 25.08.2014
                 Date of Pronouncement : 25.08.2014

                                      ORDER
PER Dr. S.T.M. PAVALAN, JM:

      This Appeal filed by the Revenue is directed against the order of the
Ld.CIT(A) -2, Mumbai dated 24.11.2010 for the Assessment Year 2004-05.

2.    In this appeal the Revenue has raised the following grounds:-
      "Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of case and in law, the Ld.
      (A) erred in quashing the assessment relying upon the decision of the Hon'ble
      ITAT in the case of assessee for A.Y. 2003-04.

      The Ld.CIT(A) further erred in overlooking the fact that the appeal against
      order of ITAT for A.Y. 2003-04 was not authorized due to low tax effect."




3.    Briefly stated, the AO issued the notice u/s 148 to the assessee on the ground
that interest on income tax refund was not on account of business activity pertaining
to banking business and therefore, ought to have been taxed as income under the
head `income from other sources' which was not done by the assessee. Accodingly,
the AO proceeded to assess the income of the assessee accordingly. On appeal, the
Ld.CIT(A), by relying on the decision of the Tribunal in the assessee's own case for
the A.Y. 2003-04, wherein on identical issue, the Tribunal held that reopening of
assessment on this count was not justified. Consequently, the Ld.CIT(A) quashed
                                                                                     ITA No. 1215/Mum/2011
                                                2                                  The Zoroastrian Co-op Bank Ltd
                                                                                    Assessment Year: 2004-05



the assessment order. Aggrieved by the impugned order, the Revenue is in appeal
before us.
4.      Having heard both the sides and perused the material on record, it is
pertinent to mention that the Tribunal in the asessee's own case, in the cross
objections filed by the assessee in CO No. 4/Mum/2010, against the revenue's
appeal in ITA No. 3878/Mum/2009 for the A.Y. 2003-04, by relying on the decision
of the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of CIT Vs. Kelvinator of India Ltd. [(2010) 320
ITR 561 (SC)], has held that the reopening of the assessment on similar ground was
not proper and hence set aside the assessment order. The Ld.CIT(A) has followed
the said order of the Tribunal for quashing the reopened assessment during the year
under consideration on similar set of facts. In this connection, it is relevant to state
that the said order of the Tribunal is only on the issue of validity of reopening the
assessment u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act and not on the issue of merit as to the
addition made in the reopened assessment. However, in the present appeal the
Revenue contends that they have not preferred the appeal against the said order of
the Tribunal for the A.Y. 2003-04 due to low tax effect. When the Tribunal has held
the issue of validity of reopening alone in the A.Y. 2003-04, the contention of the
Revenue that they have not preferred the appeal against the order of the Tribunal is
misconceived. Therefore, we do not find any merit in the appeal filed by the
Revenue which deserves to be dismissed.




5.      In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed.
     Order pronounced in the open court on this 25th day of August, 2014.

               Sd/-                                                           Sd/-
         (N.K. BILLAIYA)                                           (Dr. S.T.M. PAVALAN)
       ACCOUNTANT MEMBER                                             JUDICIAL MEMBER
Mumbai, Dated: 25.08.2014
*Srivastava
Copy to: The Appellant
         The Respondent
         The CIT, Concerned, Mumbai
         The CIT(A) Concerned, Mumbai
         The DR "G" Bench

                                        //True Copy//
                                                            By Order

                                              Dy/Asstt. Registrar, ITAT, Mumbai.

 
 
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2016 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Binarysoft Technologies - Achievements

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions