Need Tally
for Clients?

Contact Us! Here

  Tally Auditor

License (Renewal)
  Tally Gold

License Renewal

  Tally Silver

License Renewal
  Tally Silver

New Licence
  Tally Gold

New Licence
 
Open DEMAT Account with in 24 Hrs and start investing now!
« From the Courts »
Open DEMAT Account in 24 hrs
 Allahabad HC Orders GSTN to Modify Portal within 1 Month to Allow Appeals Even When Disputed Tax Shows Nil
 Statement Recorded By High Courts Can't Be Later Contradicted By Counsel : Supreme Court
 Karnataka High Court restrains Bengaluru-based Institute of Chartered Tax Practitioners India from enrolling candidates for its courses
 Attachment on Cash Credit of Assessee under GST Act: Delhi HC directs Bank to Comply Instructions to Vacate
 Income Tax Addition Made Towards Unsubstantiated Share Capital Is Eligible For Section 80-IC Deduction: Delhi High Court
 Inordinate delay in income tax appeal hearings
 Income Tax leviable on Tuition Fee in the Year of Rendering of Services: ITAT
 Supreme Court invoked its power under Article 142 of Constitution to validate notices issued under section 148 as notices issued under section 148A. However the same shall be subject to amended provisions of section 149.
 ITAT refuses to stay tax demand on former owner of Raw Pressery brand
 Bombay HC sets aside rejection of refund claims by GST authorities
 [Income Tax Act] Faceless Assessment Scheme does not take away right to personal hearing: Delhi High Court

Tax paid by employer on behalf of staff is exempt from taxation: High Court
August, 23rd 2012

Tax paid by an employer on behalf of employees is a non-monetary remuneration and therefore exempt from tax, according to an Uttarakhand High Court order. The income-tax department had held that employees are obliged to pay tax on the tax paid by their employers on their behalf. The high court delivered this verdict on July 30 on an appeal filed by the Director, International Taxation, New Delhi against Triton Holding, R&B Falcon, Sedco Forex International Drilling, Transocean Offshore International Ventures and Transocean Discoverer and Others, BG International.

The court pointed out that Section 17 (2) of the Income-tax Act, among other things, exempts "any sum paid by the employer in respect of any obligation which, but for such payment, would have been payable by the assessee" . The tax paid by the employer on behalf of the employee is among the pre-requisites mentioned under this section such as rent-free accommodation, amenities granted free of cost, sum payable by the employer to Provident Fund, etc, the high court pointed out. On many occasions, employers agree to pay income tax on behalf of the employees .

The issue before the court was whether the tax paid by the employer on behalf of employees would be exempt from taxation as such payments are non-monetary benefits to the employees as classified under section 10 (10CC) of the Income-tax Act. The High Court explained that Section 10 (10CC) of the Income-tax Act stipulates that such payment shall be excluded from the income of the employees computed for the purpose of taxation. The High Court also pointed out that payment of tax by the employer to the Income-tax department on account of their employees is non-monetary payment to employees and can be classified as remuneration mentioned under clause (2) of section 17 of the Income-tax Act.


 

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2026 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Ritz Consulting