Need Tally
for Clients?

Contact Us! Here

  Tally Auditor

License (Renewal)
  Tally Gold

License Renewal

  Tally Silver

License Renewal
  Tally Silver

New Licence
  Tally Gold

New Licence
 
Open DEMAT Account with in 24 Hrs and start investing now!
« From the Courts »
Open DEMAT Account in 24 hrs
 Karnataka High Court restrains Bengaluru-based Institute of Chartered Tax Practitioners India from enrolling candidates for its courses
 Attachment on Cash Credit of Assessee under GST Act: Delhi HC directs Bank to Comply Instructions to Vacate
 Income Tax Addition Made Towards Unsubstantiated Share Capital Is Eligible For Section 80-IC Deduction: Delhi High Court
 Inordinate delay in income tax appeal hearings
 Income Tax leviable on Tuition Fee in the Year of Rendering of Services: ITAT
 Supreme Court invoked its power under Article 142 of Constitution to validate notices issued under section 148 as notices issued under section 148A. However the same shall be subject to amended provisions of section 149.
 ITAT refuses to stay tax demand on former owner of Raw Pressery brand
 Bombay HC sets aside rejection of refund claims by GST authorities
 [Income Tax Act] Faceless Assessment Scheme does not take away right to personal hearing: Delhi High Court
 Rajasthan High Court directs GST Authority to Unblock Input Tax Credit availed in Electronic Credit Ledger
 Sebi-taxman fight over service tax dues reaches Supreme Court

M/S Bharti Properties Pvt. Ltd.,H-108,IInd Floor,New Asiatic Building,Connaught Place,New Delhi V/s . ACIT,Central Circle-9,New Delhi
August, 24th 2012
       IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI `A' BENCH
           BEFORE SHRI A.D.JAIN, JM & SHRI A.N. PAHUJA, AM

                            ITA nos.3044 & 3045/Del/2012
                              AYs:2002-03 & 2004-05

M/S Bharti Properties Pvt.       V/s .  ACIT,Central Circle-9,
Ltd.,H-108,IInd Floor,New               New Delhi
Asiatic Building,Connaught
Place,New Delhi
                        [PAN : AAACB9995L]


(Appellant)                                       (Respondent)

              Assessee by          None
              Revenue by           Smt. Anusha Khurana,DR


               Date of hearing                  22-08-2012
               Date of pronouncement            22-08-2012







                                  ORDER



 A.N.Pahuja:- These two appeals filed on 15.6.2012 by the assessee against
two separate orders dated 23-02-2012 & 29.3.2012 of the ld. CIT(A)-XXXII, New
Delhi for the AYs 2002-03 & 2004-05 respectively, upholding rejection of book
results in these two assessment years and consequent additions of `87,750 &
`1,900 besides enhancement of income by `45,120/- in the AY 2002-03 as also
additions of `35,196 & `54200 in the AY 2004-05. The appeal for the AY 2002-03
is delayed by 26 days. In the    application for condonation of delay , it was
submitted that since the father of Shri SK Gupta, controlling person, expired on
22.4.2012, the assessee could not file    the appeal within the time stipulated
under the relevant provisions of the Income-tax Act,1961[hereinafter referred to
as the `Act']. The appeal has been filed only on 15.6.2012 instead of on or
before 20.05.2012. The reasons adduced for delay in filing the appeal are not
substantiated by any evidence whatsoever while even copy of application for
                                         2           I.T.A. nos3044 & 3045/Del./2012







condonation of delay is not accompanied by affidavit of shri SK Gupta. None
appeared on behalf of the assessee when these appeals were called for hearing
nor any request for adjournment was filed . Earlier, the assessee was informed
on 15.6.2012 itself that the hearing of the appeal is fixed for today. It, therefore,
appears that the assessee is not interested in pursuing these appeals. In these
circumstances, following the decision of the Delhi Bench of the Tribunal in the
case of Multiplan (India) Pvt. Ltd. Vs CIT [38 ITD 320] (Del) and the decision of
the Hon'ble Madhya Pradesh High Court in the case of Estate of Late Tukojirao
Holkar Vs CWT [(1996) 223 ITR 480 (MP)], these appeals filed by the assessee
are dismissed in limine.



                  Order pronounced in open Court

         Sd/-                                                      Sd/-
    (A.D.JAIN)                                              (A.N. PAHUJA)
 (Judicial Member)                                       (Accountant Member)
NS
Copy of the Order forwarded to:-
      1. Assessee.
      2. ACIT, Central Circle-9, New Delhi
      3. CIT concerned.
      4. CIT(A), XXXII, New Delhi
      5. DR, ITAT,'A' Bench, New Delhi
      6. Guard File.
                                                                      BY ORDER,
                                                             Deputy/Asstt.Registrar
                                                                       ITAT, Delhi
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2025 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Ritz Consulting