sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing | GST - Goods and Services Tax
Latest Expert Exchange
From the Courts »
  Suresh M. Jamkhindikar vs. ACIT (Bombay High Court)
 Mangammal @ Thulasi vs. T.B. Raju (Supreme Court)
 Mahabir Industries vs. PCIT (Supreme Court)
  Oriental Bank Of Commerce Vs. Additional Commissioner Of Income Tax
  Suresh M. Jamkhindikar vs. ACIT (Bombay High Court)
  Union of India vs. Pirthwi Singh (Supreme Court)
 Cromption Greaves Limited vs. CIT (ITAT Mumbai)
 Director Of Income Tax Vs. M/s. Modiluft Ltd.
 Director Of Income Tax Vs. M/s. Royal Airways Ltd.
 Lally Motors India (P.) Ltd vs. PCIT (ITAT Amritsar)
  Mehsana District Co-operative vs. DCIT (Gujarat High Court)

Land-grab courts on loose ground
August, 13th 2012

The prospect of special courts set up to try land grab cases filed after AIADMK came to power seems in doubt following a court order which questioned the action of the special Anti-Land Grabbing Cells constituted by the police. Last week, a specially constituted bench of the Madras high court had restrained the cells from filing any chargesheet before two special courts formed so far. There are another 23 such courts proposed to be formed, but they will now have to await the final outcome of the case. But, from what was argued before the bench and what was filed by parties before it, it appears that there is a basic flaw in the state's campaign against land-grabbing . That is, it is yet to be defined as an offence. In an act of putting the cart before the horse, the government formed special investigation cells and special courts even before enacting a law, which would have contained the definition of the offence. "There is no such offence as 'land grabbing' in the Indian Penal Code, and in the absence of a special legislation these cells and courts will operate only in vacuum," said an advocate.

There are several other infirmities too. The government order dated July 28, 2011 said land grab offences committed under a particular regime between 2006 and 2011 would be probed and tried. "It is discriminatory to limit the illegality of an offence to a particular period or group," a senior jurist said.

The 25 special courts announced in the GO of August 11, 2011 are magistrate courts, but in scores of cases the offences are beyond the scope of magisterial forums. One petitioner before the high court, P A Murugesan of Salem had submitted a randomly selected list of 15 land grab cases, which could be tried by the judicial/metropolitan magistrates. However, they would have no power to award punishment . There is another set of seven cases which cannot be taken cognizance of by these special courts.

Chief minister J Jayalalithaa's stated objective of returning the lands to their owners cannot be achieved through this process, because these special courts are criminal courts. It is needless to state that the culmination of criminal proceedings is punishment/ imprisonment of the offender and not restoration of property to its owner.

However, reiterating the necessity of a comprehensive law to curb the menace of land-grabbing , experts point to the Andhra Pradesh model. The Andhra Pradesh Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, brought out in 1982, first defines the offence. "Land grabbing means every activity of grabbing any land whether belonging to government or endowment or Wakf or private person, without any lawful entitlement and with a view to illegally taking possession of such lands or enter into or create illegal tenancies or lease and licence agreements or any other illegal agreements in respect of such lands or to construct unauthorised structures therein for sale or hire or give such lands to any person on rental or lease..."

Unlike the special magisterial courts in Tamil Nadu, the special land grab courts in Andhra Pradesh were of sessions-grade and they had powers to entertain cases of criminal or civil, or both. While Section 9 of the Act gave the powers of a civil and sessions court to them, there was an appeal provision too.

On its part, the high court addressed a letter to the state home secretary on August 9, 2011, conceding that the court had drafted a notification on these special courts which have no legal ambit.

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2018 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Binarysoft Technologies - Our Vision

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions