Latest Expert Exchange Queries

GST Demo Service software link:
Username: demouser Password: demopass
Get your inventory and invoicing software GST Ready from Binarysoft
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing | GST - Goods and Services Tax
Popular Search: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: VAT Audit :: form 3cd :: TDS :: empanelment :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: VAT RATES :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: due date for vat payment :: cpt
From the Courts »
 R.L.Traders Vs. Income Tax Officer Ward 47(1)
  Sc Johnson Products Private Limited Vs. Additional Commissioner Of Income Tax, Special Range-8, New Delhi
  Sanjay Bimalchand Jain vs. Pr CIT (Bombay High Court)
 Sanjay Bimalchand Jain vs. Pr CIT (Bombay High Court)
 Bhushan Steel vs. CIT (Supreme Court)
 CIT vs. Chaphalkar Brothers Pune (Supreme Court)
 Income Tax Appellate Tribunal : Kolkata Benches : Kolkata. Sub : Cause List For The Cases Fixed On Friday The 15/12/2017
 Commissioner Of Income Tax, Delhi Vs. Maruti Suzuki India Ltd.
 Sunbeam Auto Private Limited Vs. Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax
 Sc Johnson Products Private Limited Vs. Additional Commissioner Of Income Tax, Special Range-8, New Delhi
  Amira Pure Foods Pvt. Ltd vs. Pr CIT (ITAT Delhi)

ABOTT INDIA LIMITED, Unit 3-4 Corporate Park, SionTrombay Road, Chembur Mumbai 400071 Vs. Addl. CIT, Range 2(1), Aayakar Bhavan,M.K. Road Mumbai 400020
August, 30th 2012
                                        ITA No.3005 of 2011 Abott India Ltd Mumbai A Bench

                      "A" Bench, Mumbai

          Before Shri B.R. Mittal, Judicial Member and
           Shri B. Ramakotaiah, Accountant Member

                     ITA No.3055/Mum/2011
                     (Assessment year: 2005-06)

ABOTT INDIA LIMITED, Unit 3-      Vs.   Addl. CIT, Range 2(1),
4 Corporate Park, Sion-                 Aayakar Bhavan,
Trombay Road, Chembur                   M.K. Road
Mumbai 400071                           Mumbai 400020
(Appellant)                                    (Respondent)

                   Assessee by:   Shri Nikhil Ranjan
                   Department by: Mrs. Sasmita Misra, DR

                   Date of Hearing:       29/8/2012
                   Date of Pronouncement: 29/8/2012


Per B. Ramakotaiah, A.M.

       This is an appeal by assessee against the order of the CIT-2
Mumbai, dated 22-03-2011 under section 263 of the Income Tax
2.     At the outset the learned Counsel placed on record a letter
indicating that the consequential order in this case which was
supposed to be passed has not been passed and has become time
barred in terms of second proviso under section 153(2A). It was
submitted that the captioned appeal has become academic in

3.     The DR was asked to inquire whether consequential order has
been passed or not. Vide letter dated 28.8.2012 the learned CIT(DR)
informed that AO could not get the relevant records traceable and
has requested for time. It appears that the consequential order has
not been passed, otherwise the record could have been available or

                                Page 1 of 2
                                           ITA No.3005 of 2011 Abott India Ltd Mumbai A Bench

at least orders could have been served on assessee. Therefore, we
are of the opinion that the order under section 263 of the Act
became academic in nature. Therefore, assessee's request for
withdrawing the appeal as it became infructuous has to be
accepted. The Revenue is free to move miscellaneous application, if
required to recall the order in case the consequential orders have
been passed within the time as per the provisions of the law. With
these observations, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.

4.        In the result appeal filed by assessee is treated as withdrawn.

          Order pronounced in the open court on 29th August, 2012.

                 Sd/-                                Sd/-
             (B.R. Mittal)                     (B. Ramakotaiah)
           Judicial Member                    Accountant Member

Mumbai, dated 29th August, 2012.


Copy to:

     1.   The   Appellant
     2.   The   Respondent
     3.   The   concerned CIT(A)
     4.   The   concerned CIT
     5.   The   DR, "A" Bench, ITAT, Mumbai

                                  By Order

                            Assistant Registrar
                       Income Tax Appellate Tribunal,
                         Mumbai Benches, MUMBAI

                                    Page 2 of 2
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2017 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Software Reengineering Software Re-engineering Software Reverse Engineering Software Reverse Development Software Change Modulation Software Conversion Software Re-creation Software Re-development

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions