sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing | GST - Goods and Services Tax
Latest Expert Exchange
Customs and Excise »
 Central Board of Excise and Customs to be renamed CBIC by April
 Central Board Of Excise & Customs New Delhi GST Flyers
 Hike in customs duty on electronics likely to boost revenue collection
 Customs duty raised on electronic goods
 Ministry Of Finance (Central Board Of Direct Taxes) Notification
 Refund of IGST paid on export of goods under rule 96 of CGST Rules,2017
 Customs And Central Excise Drawback – Part II
 Customs Valuation (Determination of Value of Imported Goods) Rules 2007
 Amendment to Customs Valuation Rules – Notification No. 91/2017 (NT)
 GST on Custom House Agents
 The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes

HC respite for excise & customs
August, 06th 2009

A Calcutta High Court judgment today held that Customs, Excise, Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) cannot dismiss an appeal when a writ application thereto is pending before a high court.

The order gave much awaited relief to many appellants  whose applications and pleas were pending before the CESTAT and had moved a writ application in the different high courts challenging the tribunal's orders.

While allowing a batch of writ petitions, Mr Justice Soumitra Pal held that CESTAT was not justified in dismissing the appeals for non-compliance of the order directing pre-deposit in view of the insertion of section 35 C (2A) of Central Excise Act and a similar section in Customs Act.

This section postulates that a tribunal shall endeavour to hear and decide every appeal within three years provided there is a stay order which shall be disposed of within six months of the date of the order. If not, the stay order shall be vacated.

This section has to be interpreted in a manner to bring it harmony with other provisions, particularly Section 35 F of the Excise Act, it was held. This section lays down the pre-deposit of an amount by an appellant. The proviso to this section is that he can make application seeking waiver of the pre-deposited sum.

Intention must not be inferred solely from section 35 F if it militates against provisions in 35 C (2A), it was further held.

The provisions in Chapter VI A of the Excise Act has to be construed as a whole, the judgment stated. Intention of the Legislature has to be considered and the statute has to be given a schematic interpretation.

Interpreting CESTAT (Procedure Rules) 1982, the order given by the tribunal dismissing the appeals of non-compliance of its orders directing pre-deposit on respective dates of compliance were also illegal, the court held.

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2018 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Binarysoft Technologies - We Bring IT. Offshore software outsourcing company. We use Global Delivery Model (GDM) and believe in Follow The Sun principle

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions